Recommitted Nat Fyfe [re-signed]

Remove this Banner Ad

Lol at comparing the likely bottom 4 team getting Fyfe to the at-the-time still competitive Geelong getting Dangerfield....plus Lachie Henderson, Zac Smith and Scott Selwood. :D

You guys would be lucky to have the trade currency to get Fyfe, let alone be able to add 3 more additions the equivalent of the other 3 Geelong got with Danger, and you're looking like coming from much further back than they were when they got those 4.

Did you just come down in the last shower or something?....We already picked up Mitchell, O'Meara. Henderson & Vickery....Which would make Fyfe the cherry on top....And last I checked, free agents don't require any trade currency, unless the offer is matched....Which hasn't happened as yet.

More research required.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Did you just come down in the last shower or something?....We already picked up Mitchell, O'Meara. Henderson & Vickery....Which would make Fyfe the cherry on top....And last I checked, free agents don't require any trade currency, unless the offer is matched....Which hasn't happened as yet.

More research required.

Hahaha Henderson was a DFA, would be like us saying we already picked up Membrey and Roberton and Fyfe is the cherry on top
 
Hahaha Henderson was a DFA, would be like us saying we already picked up Membrey and Roberton and Fyfe is the cherry on top

Still On a par with Scott Selwood though....Henderson actually stays on the park.....And Roberton & Membrey are now playing good footy regularly.

Guerra was a perfect example of how valuable those pick-ups can be....Nothing to be sneezed at.
 
Still On a par with Scott Selwood though....Henderson actually stays on the park.....And Roberton & Membrey are now playing good footy regularly.

Guerra was a perfect example of how valuable those pick-ups can be....Nothing to be sneezed at.

Yes but if you think adding Fyfe to that midfield will 1. Happen and 2. Fix anything then you're completely out of it, Fyfe in a midfield with Mundy Neale hill with Sandilands giving them first use every week isn't cutting it atm, so why would Fyfe in a midfield of Mitchell (who is playing good footy no doubt but nothing Mundy or Neale haven't produced) and a seriously unconvincing O'meara be much better? Especially when McEvoy is just about the worst ruck in the league for actual ruck contests
 
Did you just come down in the last shower or something?....We already picked up Mitchell, O'Meara. Henderson & Vickery....Which would make Fyfe the cherry on top....And last I checked, free agents don't require any trade currency, unless the offer is matched....Which hasn't happened as yet.

More research required.
Lol, I'm embarrassed for you reading this post.

I'm talking about the fact that Geelong were a significantly better team in 2015 (when they won more games than they lost) than you guys are now.

Then they added all of Danger, Henderson, Smith and Scellwood to that very competitive team, so they were better, and added much more than you will if you only add Fyfe of note to what may be a bottom 3 team this year.

The fact that you've added those 4 from last year and are still 1-5 and getting regularly smashed is a big part of the problem. You need to add so much more than Fyfe to get back to the top 4 like Geelong were last year and you just don't have the trade currency to do so.

Finally, unless you offer Fyfe an insane amount of money, Freo will either match your offer, or threaten to, as Adelaide did, re Danger.
 
Lol, I'm embarrassed for you reading this post.

I'm talking about the fact that Geelong were a significantly better team in 2015 (when they won more games than they lost) than you guys are now.

Then they added all of Danger, Henderson, Smith and Scellwood to that very competitive team, so they were better, and added much more than you will if you only add Fyfe of note to what may be a bottom 3 team this year.

The fact that you've added those 4 from last year and are still 1-5 and getting regularly smashed is a big part of the problem. You need to add so much more than Fyfe to get back to the top 4 like Geelong were last year and you just don't have the trade currency to do so.

Finally, unless you offer Fyfe an insane amount of money, Freo will either match your offer, or threaten to, as Adelaide did, re Danger.


Oh, really?

And would this be the same Geelong, that began their re-build, by picking up a pair of milk-duds in Mitch Clark & Hamish McIntosh?....LOL

As to Freo matching?....Probably right....But time will tell.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

He's no old man Hurn that's for sure. At least Mundy's an above average footballer. Sadly the same can't be said for Geary..... or Hurn.

I dunno if you are attempting to troll or bait... but saying Mundy is an above average football is a dead give away.

Mundy is a Potato as a captain and a player
 
Wasn't Ben Cousins your captain once? Talk about terrible captains/role models...

Terrible role model yes but good captain, a winning captain to... can't say the same for any Dockers captain as there has been many since 95' all unsuccessful
 
Pretty weak troll bruva.
How many league captains 'give orders' you reckon?

Nat has survived 'superman cape warfie time'... I'm sure anything gears had to say to him would be warmly received.
Nat wasn't on our list during the Wharfie era. I just don't think Fyfe wants to leave his spot as an AFL captain to sit behind the all inspiring Jarryn Geary.
 
Terrible role model yes but good captain, a winning captain to... can't say the same for any Dockers captain as there has been many since 95' all unsuccessful
I think the idea of being a good captain involves being a good role model. Ben cousins was the exact opposite of that, he is the last person i would want leading a team
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Recommitted Nat Fyfe [re-signed]

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top