Red Crow
Modrarator
- Thread starter
- #1,751
Those issues were caused by the club, not Puma.
The club signs off on the design to be used each year, the buck stops with them on issues with the design.
Issues the club don't sign off on, like the numbers being too small, backwards logos and colours being washed out, are caused by ISC.
Carn. On one hand you say the smaller wings design is the clubs fault because they sign off on the design, but then you say the backwards logo on the shorts is ISC’s fault because the club don’t sign off on the design? You can’t have it both ways.
The club didn’t design the jumpers with smaller wings and tell Puma to make them. Puma continually changed their template which forced the wings to get smaller and introduced side panels that cut off the design. The club might have final say, but Puma presented those designs in the first place. To lay no blame at the hands of Puma is ludicrous.
Don’t get me wrong, the production and colour quality of Puma guernseys is top notch. But in the couple of years we had them, their off field stuff was pretty average quality and very dull designs. I’d be happy to have them back, but they’re not exactly some absolutely flawless company that can do no wrong.