NFNL div 3 2025

Remove this Banner Ad

It is not false that reserve players are similar at all levels.
They donā€™t get paid or get paid minimum. $50 I think is pretty common at D1 level for reserve guys.

Most ā€¦ most clubs and there is always a few exceptions, struggle to fill a full reserve list come the middle of the year. And the guys playing purely for the love.. are very similar across all levels.

The players that have all been mentioned are those guys in that sweet spot I was talking about that would be attractive for a D3 club. Right age, in and out of the seniors and would have a big impact at D3.

Like I mentioned, very hard to attract those guys to the bottom dweller if they have no previous tie to the club.

Easier if you are in the mix, even easier if that person has a good link to the club somehow.

Reservoir have also targeted these players and have added depth to the list if you look through the careers of some of the guys transferring from templestowe, Bundoora and Eltham.
Reserve player arenā€™t similar at all levelsā€¦ Heidelberg would be Kilmores reserves by 200 points.

D1 reserves are far far stronger.
 
Reserve player arenā€™t similar at all levelsā€¦ Heidelberg would be Kilmores reserves by 200 points.

D1 reserves are far far stronger.
Because the fringe players who are likely on a contract and are in and out of the ones are at a far higher level.

Those players are hard to attract to a d3 club finishing bottom.

Bonafide reserve players .. are similar at all levels.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Because the fringe players who are likely on a contract and are in and out of the ones are at a far higher level.

Those players are hard to attract to a d3 club finishing bottom.

Bonafide reserve players .. are similar at all levels.
Hard to attract - agreed. But Ivanhoe (Div 4) and Parade (Div 5) did in their first year of coming into the comp on less points and no experience in a semi professional comp.

I think we can all agree that a few older players to be more competitive is one thing, but when it starts to look like you are exploiting the assistance then other clubs are going to notice and not be happy about it.
 
Because the fringe players who are likely on a contract and are in and out of the ones are at a far higher level.

Those players are hard to attract to a d3 club finishing bottom.

Bonafide reserve players .. are similar at all levels.
Correct but in Reservoirs case if they are throwing around $1000 a game on 1 player you are telling me if they even offer $300-$350 a game for quality guys in the twos not getting a look in wouldnt work? 3 for the price of one and might build a new culture around them especially if they are in the 20-25 age bracket.
 
Curious question. How did Heidelberg West turn it around to be more competitive? They couldnt get off the bottom for a much longer period than Reservoir.
 
Hard to attract - agreed. But Ivanhoe (Div 4) and Parade (Div 5) did in their first year of coming into the comp on less points and no experience in a semi professional comp.

I think we can all agree that a few older players to be more competitive is one thing, but when it starts to look like you are exploiting the assistance then other clubs are going to notice and not be happy about it.
The assistance is 1 extra player to put in context.

It was obviously helps. However itā€™s not exploiting anything. Itā€™s using that assistance to recruit an extra player that hopefully increases on field performance.

Still gotta put a side out each week that fits within the points.
Reservoir have gone hard and recruited who is available to them, in a perfect scenario, 10 top line div1 fringe players jump on board long term and they sail into the sunset with sustained success.

Itā€™s just not realistic.

Like any club, 100 conversations with 100 different players may result in 5-10 recruits if you get extremely lucky and get people at the right time for them to make a move, and you take the ones that are available and donā€™t hold out for the maybe type answers.

If the club doesnā€™t become competitive in the short term it simply wonā€™t be a club in the long term.

Like you said above, a few extra older experienced players is great ā€¦ but hey .. donā€™t get too good. Donā€™t recruit too hardā€¦ just stay in your lane Rezza.

Iā€™m looking forward to the preseason chat in 2026. When everyone is even with points and hopefully there are no scheduled gimme games in the comp.

We might get dizzy from these circles Chump

To be clear, I donā€™t think handouts should be given Willy nilly, just on a case by case basis factoring in more then whatā€™s discussed on here.. can be beneficial to the comp to help eliminate the 200-250 point floggings that became the norm.

I also donā€™t think reservoir are committing first degree murder as is the vibe going on here.

But itā€™s better that they are being talked about in this light, then the alternative of if we are going to see them open the doors again and field a side.
 
Correct but in Reservoirs case if they are throwing around $1000 a game on 1 player you are telling me if they even offer $300-$350 a game for quality guys in the twos not getting a look in wouldnt work? 3 for the price of one and might build a new culture around them especially if they are in the 20-25 age bracket.
This is the point Iā€™m making.

Your intentions here are great.. but itā€™s not realistic.

Conversation goes like this:

Hey mate .. reservoir here, been looking at your stats and you are finishing in the best most weeks at (insert club)
But you arenā€™t getting a senior game.
Want to come to reservoir for more opportunities.. thereā€™s $300-$350 in it for you.
players response : No thanks, unless itā€™s 600-700 Iā€™m not interested in coming to Reservoir.

Thatā€™s just reality unfortunately.
That player who isnā€™t getting a look in that would be a good addition at 2-300.. isnā€™t going to come onboard.
And that same player who isnā€™t getting a look in, isnā€™t gonna be of good enough calibre to go drop 6-700 on and expect them to elevate your on field performance to any great level.
Their experience also isnā€™t there, because they are a ressies player as discussed. So you end up paying top dollar, to attract that guy, who doesnā€™t have the CV, the experience, the ability to warrant taking that big of a chunk.

So yes, targeting those players and getting them in the door at 2-300 would be great.

Ask any bottom sides recruiting team how that conversation goes.
 
The assistance is 1 extra player to put in context.

It was obviously helps. However itā€™s not exploiting anything. Itā€™s using that assistance to recruit an extra player that hopefully increases on field performance.

Still gotta put a side out each week that fits within the points.
Reservoir have gone hard and recruited who is available to them, in a perfect scenario, 10 top line div1 fringe players jump on board long term and they sail into the sunset with sustained success.

Itā€™s just not realistic.

Like any club, 100 conversations with 100 different players may result in 5-10 recruits if you get extremely lucky and get people at the right time for them to make a move, and you take the ones that are available and donā€™t hold out for the maybe type answers.

If the club doesnā€™t become competitive in the short term it simply wonā€™t be a club in the long term.

Like you said above, a few extra older experienced players is great ā€¦ but hey .. donā€™t get too good. Donā€™t recruit too hardā€¦ just stay in your lane Rezza.

Iā€™m looking forward to the preseason chat in 2026. When everyone is even with points and hopefully there are no scheduled gimme games in the comp.

We might get dizzy from these circles Chump

To be clear, I donā€™t think handouts should be given Willy nilly, just on a case by case basis factoring in more then whatā€™s discussed on here.. can be beneficial to the comp to help eliminate the 200-250 point floggings that became the norm.

I also donā€™t think reservoir are committing first degree murder as is the vibe going on here.

But itā€™s better that they are being talked about in this light, then the alternative of if we are going to see them open the doors again and field a side.
The 200-250 floggins are gone. Reservoir had ample points to recruit this year. They were competitive a number of games in 2024. Hence the backlash.

End of the day if you win games with more points then what's fair about it? No one is saying "don't be good" but be good within the parameters every other club follows.
 
This is the point Iā€™m making.

Your intentions here are great.. but itā€™s not realistic.

Conversation goes like this:

Hey mate .. reservoir here, been looking at your stats and you are finishing in the best most weeks at (insert club)
But you arenā€™t getting a senior game.
Want to come to reservoir for more opportunities.. thereā€™s $300-$350 in it for you.
players response : No thanks, unless itā€™s 600-700 Iā€™m not interested in coming to Reservoir.

Thatā€™s just reality unfortunately.
That player who isnā€™t getting a look in that would be a good addition at 2-300.. isnā€™t going to come onboard.
And that same player who isnā€™t getting a look in, isnā€™t gonna be of good enough calibre to go drop 6-700 on and expect them to elevate your on field performance to any great level.
Their experience also isnā€™t there, because they are a ressies player as discussed. So you end up paying top dollar, to attract that guy, who doesnā€™t have the CV, the experience, the ability to warrant taking that big of a chunk.

So yes, targeting those players and getting them in the door at 2-300 would be great.

Ask any bottom sides recruiting team how that conversation goes.
We did. Same conversations last year and this - we were Div 4 ammo's and finished 6th last year. But we are building. Not sure it is equitable to give an advantage as we are talking to get elite players in.

Ressa have recruited guys who have all come together as mates from a higher level. Points are the only thing that are able to be managed externally.

So pretty simple - make it 46 every club and all clubs are happy. Why would Ressa have an issue with that?

The top players you have recruited are some of the best in the league - Chewy, Grabowski, Greenwood, Dyson, etc. So just make it work so other clubs are not disadvantaged. What you pay them is up to you.
 
Last edited:
We did. Same conversations last year and this - we were Div 4 ammo's and finished 6th last year. But we are building. Not sure it is equitable to give an advantage as we are talking to get elite players in.

Ressa have recruited guys who have all come together as mates from higher level. Points are the only things that are able to be managed externally.

So pretty simple - make it 46 every club and all clubs are happy.

Why would Ressa have an issue with that? The top players you have recruited are some of the best in the league - Chewy, Grabowski, Greenwood, Dyson, etc. So just make it work so other clubs are not disadvantaged. What you pay them is up to you. šŸ˜Ž
Chewy and Dyson.. although have had unbelievable careers.. and certainly have spent years in that category..
are not in the elite bracket that are going to dominate the competition anymore. They will definitely help the side in the wealth of knowledge department.

Chewy is near on 50 and Dyson is 40.

The other two. Absolutely. Guns
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

All the more reason for Resa to only play at 46 points.
If and it's a big if they play finals makes a joke of all other clubs who have been allocated 46 points to play with
I am.sure clubs like Kilmore and Kinglake find it difficult to recruit players to travel the extra distance, maybe they should ask for extra points
West haven't played senior finals in over 30 years, but continue to front up and have tried to recruit the correct way. I am sure they would love extra points as well
So it's great that Resa has recruited these players to the competition, but play within the points cap, damn even Heidelberg had to play players in their 2's as they had too many points, if it's good enough for the Division 1 premier it should be good enough for Resa
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NFNL div 3 2025

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top