Opinion Non-Crows AFL 5: Save Ken

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Personally think it is stupid in an era where clubs can wear any design (indegenous/heritage/clash/rainbow) jumper yet this one is denied because Collingwood say no?

Sure they would clash somewhat when playing Collingwood, but any other game why does it matter?



Yeah HaHa Port, but really just another example of this league being an extended VFL.

On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app

Hmm no.. I will stick with the HaHa Port thanks
 
Personally think it is stupid in an era where clubs can wear any design (indegenous/heritage/clash/rainbow) jumper yet this one is denied because Collingwood say no?

Sure they would clash somewhat when playing Collingwood, but any other game why does it matter?



Yeah HaHa Port, but really just another example of this league being an extended VFL.

On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I don't see why a club founded in 1997 should be allowed to copy an established AFL side's brand?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Personally think it is stupid in an era where clubs can wear any design (indegenous/heritage/clash/rainbow) jumper yet this one is denied because Collingwood say no?

Sure they would clash somewhat when playing Collingwood, but any other game why does it matter?



Yeah HaHa Port, but really just another example of this league being an extended VFL.

On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app

Bugger off. They signed away all rights on entry

The end. Literally the end
 
I don't see why a club founded in 1997 should be allowed to copy an established AFL side's brand?
Meh, the Power took over the Magpies with OneClub. Making the SANFL club the Power Reserves.

So they bought the right to that history.


Like the anonymous Chinese car manufacturer who bought the MG badge using that history in its marketing.




I just don't see how Collingwood can control what jumper another club wears. It is not even the exact design.


On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Personally think it is stupid in an era where clubs can wear any design (indegenous/heritage/clash/rainbow) jumper yet this one is denied because Collingwood say no?

Sure they would clash somewhat when playing Collingwood, but any other game why does it matter?



Yeah HaHa Port, but really just another example of this league being an extended VFL.

On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
All they need is for the "Wharf" to be outlined by a thin teal line and they can wear it, it's the black and white stripes that Collingwood own. But Port refuse to compromise. They should have adopted the wharf design ages ago with a bit of teal and every member would have ate it up but they backed themselves into a corner banging on about the "traditional strip"
 
Meh, the Power took over the Magpies with OneClub. Making the SANFL club the Power Reserves.

So they bought the right to that history.


Like the anonymous Chinese car manufacturer who bought the MG badge using that history in its marketing.




I just don't see how Collingwood can control what jumper another club wears. It is not even the exact design.


On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Collingwood were part of the AFL first, they own that design in the league.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top