-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Opinion Non-Crows AFL 7
- Thread starter Scorpus
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Someone is getting their jollies off, * I hope they get over confident
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 86,079
- 91,461
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
I hope they got caught!
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 86,079
- 91,461
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
- Jul 6, 2017
- 31,613
- 45,380
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
What a coincidence..the 2 players who get off their charges just happen to be Richmond and Carlton players...both appealed at the tribunal and both won and both players hit the heads of their opponents and Lynch left his opponent concussed...where was the 'potential to cause injury' penalty factor there??
My word, its one rule for us and another for the big Vic clubs and all within the very same competition. Said it before and I will say it again, Silvers should be on the phone to Gil giving him the biggest serve over this and making the point that should we get victimised again at the tribunal for stuff they would never wipe out the vic boys for, our legal team will be going the injunction route rather than wasting time at the tribunal
www.afl.com.au
Chairman Jeff Gleeson said Lynch intended to fly for the mark and once he realised he misjudged it, kept his eyes on the ball and then braced for contact.
"He did not bump and he did not engage in rough conduct," Gleeson said.
Lynch off and McKay off – what a night for the power forwards.
Full story on AFL.com.au shortly.
- Michael Whiting
My word, its one rule for us and another for the big Vic clubs and all within the very same competition. Said it before and I will say it again, Silvers should be on the phone to Gil giving him the biggest serve over this and making the point that should we get victimised again at the tribunal for stuff they would never wipe out the vic boys for, our legal team will be going the injunction route rather than wasting time at the tribunal
LIVE BLOG: Tribunal makes call on Blues forward, Tiger faces ban
Follow live as Harry McKay and Tom Lynch face the Tribunal
Lynch gets off as well!
Tom Lynch has also had his case dismissed by the Tribunal.Chairman Jeff Gleeson said Lynch intended to fly for the mark and once he realised he misjudged it, kept his eyes on the ball and then braced for contact.
"He did not bump and he did not engage in rough conduct," Gleeson said.
Lynch off and McKay off – what a night for the power forwards.
Full story on AFL.com.au shortly.
- Michael Whiting
FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
I fully agree with the lynch decision.What a coincidence..the 2 players who get off their charges just happen to be Richmond and Carlton players...both appealed at the tribunal and both won and both players hit the heads of their opponents and Lynch left his opponent concussed...where was the 'potential to cause injury' penalty factor there??
My word, its one rule for us and another for the big Vic clubs and all within the very same competition. Said it before and I will say it again, Silvers should be on the phone to Gil giving him the biggest serve over this and making the point that should we get victimised again at the tribunal for stuff they would never wipe out the vic boys for, our legal team will be going the injunction route rather than wasting time at the tribunal
LIVE BLOG: Tribunal makes call on Blues forward, Tiger faces ban
Follow live as Harry McKay and Tom Lynch face the Tribunal
Lynch gets off as well!
Tom Lynch has also had his case dismissed by the Tribunal.
Chairman Jeff Gleeson said Lynch intended to fly for the mark and once he realised he misjudged it, kept his eyes on the ball and then braced for contact.
"He did not bump and he did not engage in rough conduct," Gleeson said.
Lynch off and McKay off – what a night for the power forwards.
Full story on AFL.com.au shortly.
- Michael Whiting
Am I the only one who still don’t particularly rate the Saints?
- Jul 6, 2017
- 31,613
- 45,380
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I don't..not after what they did to McAdam and by extension us. why should we get the rank bad decision and the vic clubs get the free pass.. I'd rather McAdam had got off, then I'd be much more sympathetic to vic club players hitting opposition player heads and causing concussion and getting away with it
FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
I’m purely looking at it as what happened not comparing it to other suspensions.
Anything compared to Mcadams will look ridiculous.
- Jul 6, 2017
- 31,613
- 45,380
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I just don't think the AFL should be able to look at the other decisions without the McAdam decision regardless of whether they consider precedent or not. They made an example of the least bad bump that round and we lost r best medium forward for 3 weeks. So nah, I want any indiscretion by the vic boys to be treated as harshly as we were treated as thats fair..not what we saw tonight regardless
FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
2 wrongs don’t make a right.
They completely stuff up with Mcadams incident.
Let’s get things back on track.
- Jul 6, 2017
- 31,613
- 45,380
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
No but they make it even
Could be the same person, using burner Social Media accounts.
Getting off on all the attention, the sick ****.
They need to stop reporting these.
On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Was good to see Bicks on AFL 360 tonight, he's probably my favourite former play in a media sense as he generally speaks with a level head and is very close to whats happening to the club at the current time.
GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 81,717
- 133,763
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox
After/During Draft Trade Period where clubs and players can agree to swap to another club on the day for picks or player
The AFC draft McAsey - listen Hamish I dont want to move
ok son leave it with me - hey SoS - want a KPD? we take your next 2 picks?
I think he thinks he’s bulletproof proof, needs to be sat down and find out what reality is
He's about to find out the hard way.
Unfortunately he's highly likely to end up in jail.
- Nov 5, 2009
- 11,276
- 11,529
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Going to be one to follow - especially if North part ways.
Could be our Stengle in 2024/2025.
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
This is getting ridiculous now. These SM platforms need to take a stance.
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
As it has always been Kane.
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
I'm thinking it's the same person(s)....
I would have thought that if the offence is classified correctly in the first place, then that determines the penalty. The MRO can't just classify it upwards (to the tribunal) because they think the penalty should be higher. That's supposed to be the point of the classification system.
If the MRO is sending players to the tribunal because they "think" the penalty should be higher, they're just asking for an appeal.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
