Game Day Non-Swans Game Day Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

I see George Hewett sometimes, his contested possessions, and shake my head as to what could have been. No sign of those back problems.
He was pidgeon holed as a defensive on baller with us, a role he was excellent at, and I suspect we felt he was expendable as we had Rowie, who was younger and fitter. An unfortunate mistake which many would argue wasn't even in hindsight.
 
He was pidgeon holed as a defensive on baller with us, a role he was excellent at, and I suspect we felt he was expendable as we had Rowie, who was younger and fitter. An unfortunate mistake which many would argue wasn't even in hindsight.
I did and would definitely argue that. I remember the "surplus to requirements" talk and how the game has changed, that more dynamic, faster, offensive minded types were needed for the future, where contested, defensive stuff wasn't as important.

Well well well.
 
He was pidgeon holed as a defensive on baller with us, a role he was excellent at, and I suspect we felt he was expendable as we had Rowie, who was younger and fitter. An unfortunate mistake which many would argue wasn't even in hindsight.
We were going to de-list him. He was not in Horse's plans. I thought it a bad move at the time and it has actually proved so. He is a mid that does the hard grunt, like Rowie. You need two of them, we only have one and one in the reserves, Gus. But he is a bigger unit and stronger than Gus. He was sensational last night and always plays well and is used as a pure mid not a tagger. Longmire just couldn't see it. He only saw him as a tagger and yet if you looked at his history with us, he was better as a pure mid, his disposals were always much higher.

The two worst list decisions, getting rid of Mummy and Hewett. Mummy was angry. He never wanted to leave but due to the Buddy deal he got pushed out. Hewie didn't want to leave either. But Horse wanted him out and with Mummy as long as Horse had Buddy he reckoned he didn't need Mummy. That worked out welll didn't it, The Great Saviour didn't win us a Premiership. As much as I admired Buddy as a player, his contract was always going to be a restriction on us getting other top end talent or being able to pay developing juniors what they were worth.
 
Last edited:
Watching the Bulldogs story on Fox. Geez Bob Murphy has an extremely punchable face. Poor woe Footscray. The only way they won a flag in the modern era was to have it gifted to them by the AFL and umpires.

I must say though after knowing Georgie Bisset for the last 25 years he is a ripper of a bloke. I'm happy he is in their team of the century and he was very very very stiff to not be a Brownlow medalist to boot.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We were going to de-list him. He was not in Horse's plans. I thought it a bad move at the time and it has actually proved so. He is a mid that does the hard grunt, like Rowie. You need two of them, we only have one and one in the reserves, Gus. But he is a bigger unit and stronger than Gus. He was sensational last night and always plays well and is used as a pure mid not a tagger. Longmire just couldn't see it. He only saw him as a tagger and yet if you looked at his history with us, he was better as a pure mid, his disposals were always much higher.

The two worst list decisions, getting rid of Mummy and Hewett. Mummy was angry. He never wanted to leave but due to the Buddy deal he got pushed out. Hewie didn't want to leave either. But Horse wanted him out and with Mummy as long as Horse had Buddy he reckoned he didn't need Mummy. That worked out welll didn't it, The Great Saviour didn't win us a Premiership. As much as I admired Buddy as a player, his contract was always going to be a restriction on us getting other top end talent or being able to pay developing juniors what they were worth.
Angus Sheldrick was playing for Claremont when George exercised his free agency rights.

As for the rest of that dribble...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Game Day Non-Swans Game Day Thread


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top