Preview Official: Second Preliminary Final: North Melbourne vs West Coast, Saturday 26th September

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Congrats guys fantastic effort back to back prelims and who would have thought that both our clubs would be in one and we both did it with out any priority picks just shows how well the lists are managed. You guys played out of your boots. Cant wait for the Nic Nat V Goldstein match up should be a real beauty two such different ruckman but such stars and both great blokes too.

Midfield should be great too Swallow, Ziebell, Cunnington, Jacobs, Dalsanto V Gaff, Shuey, Priddis, Masten,
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Congrats guys fantastic effort back to back prelims and who would have thought that both our clubs would be in one and we both did it with out any priority picks just shows how well the lists are managed. You guys played out of your boots. Cant wait for the Nic Nat V Goldstein match up should be a real beauty two such different ruckman but such stars and both great blokes too.

Midfield should be great too Swallow, Ziebell, Cunnington, Jacobs, Dalsanto V Gaff, Shuey, Priddis, Masten,
It should be a cracker!

Now give Simmo back!
 
I'm pleased that the surface was so good last night, far less taxing than playing on the usual cow paddock up there. We took care of business, now let's recover and be our best next week.
 
Who takes Lecras? He's my big worry, obviously Tarrant goes to Kennedy, Thompson probably to Darling, so Spud maybe to Lecras? Wright maybe? I think Lukey will probably get dropped for Tarrant but I actually think he's probably the best match up for Lecras. But who else do you drop for Tarrant? Hansen was good, everyone else plays their role so well. Wow this is a nice conundrum to have.
 
Who takes Lecras? He's my big worry, obviously Tarrant goes to Kennedy, Thompson probably to Darling, so Spud maybe to Lecras? Wright maybe? I think Lukey will probably get dropped for Tarrant but I actually think he's probably the best match up for Lecras. But who else do you drop for Tarrant? Hansen was good, everyone else plays their role so well. Wow this is a nice conundrum to have.

Wright on Le Cras I would have thought.
 
I reckon we open the daw next week.

Daw in Brown out.

That's a curve ball!
I don't mind this too. But something in the grey matter is reminding me that Maj is facing his court case around this time. Wasn't it set for September?
 
Tarrant vs Kennedy
Thompson vs Darling
Hansen vs Resting Ruckman
Wright vs LeCras
Firrito vs Hill
Atley vs Cripps
Our big backline is actually well matched against their forward line. Part of the reason for the dominance this season is that they have often monstered smaller defenses, hence the big scores.

It is their defense that will be under the hammer coping with our talls.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I reckon we open the daw next week.

Daw in Brown out.

That's a curve ball!

That's not a curve ball, that's stupidity and has no merit.
 
Thomas should be fresh and firing to play a full game although i have liked him as the sub. Think he comes in and Mcdonald to sub.
Nahas may come in for Turner to play a defensive/forward role on hurn.. cannot let this guy get off the chain. Their rebound off half back against Hawthorn was scary good.
 
I'd leave both out tbh, give Thomas a full game and leave McDonald in the side.
When was the last time LT had a decent game over in Perth? i remember him stinking it up most times....
 
ronda rousey to arm bar priddis gaff and josh kennedy and nic nat before the game and the match is ours
 
Tarrant and Nahas in.

Luke and Kanye out.

Jacobs>Shuey
Gibson>Gaff
Nahas>best running defender

Victory! They have been allowed to freewheel all year. We can do them over by tagging all their hard running link up players.
 
When was the last time LT had a decent game over in Perth? i remember him stinking it up most times....

Eh, it's about using the best options, he played the game smart when he came on against the Swans. If he is flying for marks and trying to be a FF then yeah, he isn't as valuable to the side. If he can put in a four quarter effort like he did when he came on vs Swans then he is the best option imo.
 
Eh, it's about using the best options, he played the game smart when he came on against the Swans. If he is flying for marks and trying to be a FF then yeah, he isn't as valuable to the side. If he can put in a four quarter effort like he did when he came on vs Swans then he is the best option imo.
you managed to avoid my question completely.... well done...

Im not arguing that he is best 22.... needs to sit at Browns feet....
 
you managed to avoid my question completely.... well done...

Im not arguing that he is best 22.... needs to sit at Browns feet....

He usually kicks a goal, often sets up others. How he played previously at a particular stadium in the past is irrelevant really unless you think there is kryptonite in the stadium which makes him unable to play there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top