trac would do all the cooking and Jake would inhale it all like Matt Preston before declaring it wasn’t to his liking.If we get both Petracca and Stringer, they could start their own cooking show.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
trac would do all the cooking and Jake would inhale it all like Matt Preston before declaring it wasn’t to his liking.If we get both Petracca and Stringer, they could start their own cooking show.
Maybe he's the new Shultz next year if Stringer doesn't come to us. I'll back Lippa to improve though, he may have been protecting his shoulder and having one of those off years like a few boys did.Lippa cops a bit.
And how will we back-reference our elaborate 8 club trade scenarios when they inevitably come true?This thread split is going to make ridiculous trade suggestions difficult to read:
Collingwood give: Noble, Richards,Hawks 2nd rounder.
Collingwood get: see other thread.
You would think a clause be added re his fitness and behaviour. If he lands here, I can see the upside of him tagging with JD whilst HH is out.Definitely don’t want Stringer, however as crazy as it sounds he would actually perform better in our team. Plenty of others around the forward half to apply pressure allowing him to kick goals.
All you'll need to understand my next trade suggestion is a basic understanding of quantum physics and your computer plugged into a monitor so you can have 2 screens open.And how will we back-reference our elaborate 8 club trade scenarios when they inevitably come true?
Trac would need to bake pies and sausage rolls.trac would do all the cooking and Jake would inhale it all like Matt Preston before declaring it wasn’t to his liking.
Fortunately I have both of those things - fire away!All you'll need to understand my next trade suggestion is a basic understanding of quantum physics and your computer plugged into a monitor so you can have 2 screens open.
Don’t mind it for minimum chips, question on culture damage. Let’s face it we don’t have the picks to bring in enough talent this year, so maybe worth a gambleYou would think a clause be added re his fitness and behaviour. If he lands here, I can see the upside of him tagging with JD whilst HH is out.
Yeah no doubt about it. You’re about to have a kid though, think about the well being of your child… if you can’t think about your own well mental health. There are no winners in that scenario.I’d imagine she was pretty angry about it. Maybe she wanted to expose him publicly for what he did. Seems reasonable to me.
I thought this was the Trade thread. Or is it the Petracca thread? I’ve lost trakMods - the new thread title - please confirm its only temporary. Otherwise where do we get to post about Stringer?
Trac does the cooking and Jake does the eating.If we get both Petracca and Stringer, they could start their own cooking show.
Tongue in cheek.Poll added
From your post above.I’m not insisting all facts are or aren’t in the public domain, all spin. That remains to be seen. What I am saying is that sideswipe has used all available info to form an opinion, which is the logical and rational thing to do, while you’re creating hypotheticals based on your imagination working on the assumption that there’s damning info being withheld.
If you want to believe your own fantasies then have at it, but don’t pretend that others who work on all the actual facts that are available are the ones not living in the real world. It’s pathetic.
I don't think i went 'wokeness is madness!' , even though it may well be. But past performance is being touted on this forum as a reason not to trade him in.Calm down, Gabbo. No need to go all 'wokeness is madness!' on me.
Stringer hasn't been accused of a crime. There will be no charge, no trial to determine guilt or otherwise. Not being selected by the Collingwood Football Club isn't a 'conviction'.
It's a simple acknowledgment that, in many cases, past performance may indeed be a predictor of future outcomes.
Then we could possibly lure Merrett across in the future?All I’ve read is that they won’t be offering him a new contract and Merrett went and had a whinge about it. If that’s correct then presumably?
Get Stringer for a chiko roll wrapper, then coax Merrett across for peanuts after he sues the list manager and goes to a grievance tribunal?Then we could possibly lure Merrett across in the future?
What a silly statement. How am I justifying any form of behaviour by saying I don't wipe a person permanently if they have behaved badly? As I stated- I'm sure there are many posters who have done things they regret. Get off your high horse. Do you cut people out of your life if they act badly, are drug addicted, have committed a crime etc...? There are far worse things a person can do than sleep with a 17 year old. Murderers often get second chances. Some are even treated like heroes.Thousands of people do the dirty on their pregnant missus with school girls? Even putting the gambling aside, that’s life destroying shit, and there’s no excuse for it. There’s a reason why his team mates wanted him out of the club at the Bulldogs and I’m sure they had the opportunity to hear both sides of the story.
But f*** me… if you really believe there’s any justification for doing the dirty on your pregnant missus with a school girl barely over the age of consent, then you seriously need help.
That’s the question. Do we think our culture is strong enough, or do we think that Stringer for 2 years sends us back to the stone ages?Don’t mind it for minimum chips, question on culture damage. Let’s face it we don’t have the picks to bring in enough talent this year, so maybe worth a gamble
There are far worse things a person can do than sleep with a 17 year old.
Is there any possible downside to our strategy of becoming a destination club for highly litigious and fat players?Get Stringer for a chiko roll wrapper, then coax Merrett across for peanuts after he sues the list manager and goes to a grievance tribunal?
It’s so crazy it might just work. Sign me up.
Only hypothetical that occurs is if the fat guy eats the trade papers or even the players… Otherwise it’s bulletproof.Is there any possible downside to our strategy of becoming a destination club for highly litigious players? And that fat guy?
So it’s back to being her fault again - because she made a poor choice of partner.Women in Australia are free to choose who they partner with, she also needs to accept responsibility for her poor choices.
It’s like marrying a drug dealer and blaming him for making you a junky.
Objectively both parties to blame is the point, you don’t know what goes on behind close doors either.
Yeah, poor angle that one…So it’s back to being her fault again - because she made a poor choice of partner.
Unbelievable