Waspy79
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 14, 2008
- 11,739
- 12,486
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Other Teams
- Trailblazers
I disagree. I think it adds a lot.
I tend to seek out opinion on structure and so forth at the preseason stage, and then pretty much don't care about whoever is the "hype" player answer for the rest of the season on here. I think their post is basically saying be careful of just asking questions and acting on whatever the "majority" response is.
E.g. "trade clark to seaby and upgrade medhurst to j. brown" could almost be considered a "majority" or group-think response as that's pretty much been posted quite a few times, despite my own disagreements with that tactic (though i don't have any of those players in my side.... so guess my opinion is moot).
Anyway... chasing upgrades/downgrades, rookies etc. etc. just because watching the games, keeping an eye on those players you wished started rnd 1 and watching the fallen guns get lapped up at the right time of the season. None of this will be discussed openly until post-fact e.g. "Har har i picked up what's his face and he just score 120 and will go up 100k and now none of you can get him!"... though the occurence of such is lessened due to fanfooty/FF Genie etc. etc., but ppl that might trade early chasing the negative BE's trying to fix their "out of form" players that are fit and happy are just setting themselves up for regret. I learnt this last year with travis tuck.
This thread is about player x versus player y. People can form opinions based on what others tell them here or they can do their own research. The post I referred to was as useful as **** on a bull. Anyone worth their dream team salt will know research can be done to look at prior years scoring. But perhaps people don't want to, can't be stuffed, would prefer rely on bigfooty 'experts'... and therefore post here.
Anyway... it's really not an issue as important as;
Dangerfield versus Ballantyne versus having a third rookie mid and an extra $150K or so cash.