Because the VFL were offering money they didn’t have. The VFL was the strongest of the 3 big leagues which again everyone knows but it doesn’t change they were all top tier footy status. Population takes care of funding and depth of comp.
All 3 Grand Finals played on the same day, each State totally embraced their own state league GF and eventual premier. No one cared about some other comp thousands of miles away.
Based on what you are implying the EPL is 1st tier, and the German and Spanish leagues are second tier. Or are they all top tier leagues with one being stronger than another?
In 1970, as it is today, the biggest stage in all of Australian rules football was the MCG on the last Saturday in September and nothing else has ever come close
For the 1970 season the VFL averaged around 24k attendances across 6 games per week compared to the SANFL’s 9k with 5 games per week. Every VFL final in 1970 had over 100k in attendance with an average crowd of 111k for the 4 finals games. For comparison 2019 averaged 62k over 9 games, and only 120k more fans in total than 1970. The difference in population size argument only serves to point out how small Adelaide’s population was (under 900k in 1970) compared to Melbourne (around 2.4 million). 1970 was also the best attended year in WAFL history with an average attendances of 9k over 4 games per week during their H&A season. So on any given weekend in 1970, around 40k would attend WAFL games, 47k would attend SANFL games, and 144k would attend VFL games. Way more people in 1970 went to a VFL game instead of either a WAFL or SANFL game, so it makes sense that the VFL was seen as a bigger deal than the SANFL or WAFL, literally because so much more people saw the VFL compared to any other league.
This clearly gave the VFL a financial advantage no other state league could hope to match. To think that financial/attendance advantage has no impact on the relative quality of the different leagues is to ignore the obvious role money and the amount of people watching plays in sporting comps, even in less professional times. No other state league would have been able to expand into Victoria without an established VFL club joining their comp, and outside of one of the big 4 at the time, it wouldn’t really have made a financial difference on the remaining VFL clubs either way. The VFL on the other hand, were able to start up to brand new clubs from scratch that are still the dominant football clubs in those markets today and have been since pretty much the start. That plays a massive part in the lingering resentment and jealousy from other states towards Victoria, because the VFL’s incursions into their states killed their state leagues when they know the same wouldn’t have come close to happening if the SANFL/WAFL tried to do that. There is no doubting that high quality football was played by some of the best ever in those comps. But to say the strength of those competitions were even close is serious revisionist history.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk