Port Power cruelly denied another historic achievement

Remove this Banner Ad

Answered in the other thread after seven requests, and even then you still don't understand the question or the issue even after I break it down to the point where i'm almost spelling out the syllables.

Your hilarious diversion to try and tie up the inconsistencies based on what the rumours were with respect to the Francis and Burgoyne, is priceless and unheard of in this forum i'm sure. This makes the 2011 TOTY look inconsequential when it comes to 'self-ownership'. Squirm squirm!


Did you know that the AASB is thinking of making changes to the standard on the recording and recognition of employee benefits? Maybe I could start a thread on it because it is AASB 119 :thumbsu::D

Don't let Sejerk know about AASB 119, as his prostate is currently as dry as a dead dingo's donger and dry thumping a fist on webcam is most unbecoming.

Hey PornotashMoron did you know that GWS won a NAB Cup game on weekend and instead of trolling Carlton, who are sitting on zero wins, that some dim wit started a thread trolling Port?
 
thurman is desperately trying to get some momentum up in this (his) sad little thread, keep plugging away thurmy:thumbsu:

My momentum is sublime, dear boy :thumbsu:

I think I might be the only person to have got D_One to resort to the 'that's your opinion, this is my opinion' fairweather diversion tactic. He couldn't answer the question I raised after six requests, and when he did on the seventh, his smoking gun to tie up the loose ends is 'both cases are different'.

He wasn't so accepting when he constantly asked the 'Why do the Camry Crows have such paltry sponsorship revenue?' question 100 times, did he? Why do you think he's had a change of tone when the boot is on the other foot?

Hmmm...?
 
My momentum is sublime, dear boy :thumbsu:

I think I might be the only person to have got D_One to resort to the 'that's your opinion, this is my opinion' fairweather diversion tactic. He couldn't answer the question I raised after six requests, and when he did on the seventh, his smoking gun to tie up the loose ends is 'both cases are different'.

He wasn't so accepting when he constantly asked the 'Why do the Camry Crows have such paltry sponsorship revenue?' question 100 times, did he? Why do you think he's had a change of tone when the boot is on the other foot?

Hmmm...?

Was that in the thread that was about the camry crows paltry sponsorship revenue?:confused: - I think so:thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Don't let Sejerk know about AASB 119, as his prostate is currently as dry as a dead dingo's donger and dry thumping a fist on webcam is most unbecoming.

Hey PornotashMoron did you know that GWS won a NAB Cup game on weekend and instead of trolling Carlton, who are sitting on zero wins, that some dim wit started a thread trolling Port?

Hang on, is that a personal attack against Thurman Munson or me? I thought you frowned upon unsubstantiated personal attacks? :confused:

You could bring up any world issue, past or present, and I could find a way to troll Port about it. That's the beauty of your club's current predicament, and what's even better is that you guys do all the work!

All we have to do is mention 119 and you go ape.

Can I just get some clarification on this - it's okay to troll Port in your eyes but only if its related to Port itself? So trolling you guys on something unrelated to the club (gee, thats never happened on this board before) is out of line?

If Port actually came out and said they want to win the NAB Cup after hypothetically getting to the GF, would you be surprised if Camry Crows flogs didn't make fun of Port because of that? I know I wouldn't be surprised.....
 
Was that in the thread that was about the camry crows paltry sponsorship revenue?:confused: - I think so:thumbsu:

Yup, it sure was :thumbsu: You remember that thread don't you? The thread he started where he asked over and over again even though I myself put it into bullet points why it might be the case (even though numerous people did that before me).

Oops! Because I referred to this in another thread, it didn't happen right? :eek:
 
Yup, it sure was :thumbsu: You remember that thread don't you? The thread he started where he asked over and over again even though I myself put it into bullet points why it might be the case (even though numerous people did that before me).

Oops! Because I referred to this in another thread, it didn't happen right? :eek:

Nup, this thread is failure so you're trying some (alot) misdirect!
 
Why so much hate for the op :confused:

I made an incorrect statement saying that Port was the first club to lose to the Suns last year. I admit I was wrong, although when and if Port lose to GWS this year in the major round, it does still present an opportunity to mock Port again.

As usual, my 'self-ownership' generates much derision. As it should.

Hang on, am I diverting now?
 
I made an incorrect statement saying that Port was the first club to lose to the Suns last year. I admit I was wrong, although when and if Port lose to GWS this year in the major round, it does still present an opportunity to mock Port again.

As usual, my 'self-ownership' generates much derision. As it should.

Hang on, am I diverting now?

Regardless, we all know Port Adelaide are an embarrassment.
 
My momentum is sublime, dear boy :thumbsu:

I think I might be the only person to have got D_One to resort to the 'that's your opinion, this is my opinion' fairweather diversion tactic. He couldn't answer the question I raised after six requests, and when he did on the seventh, his smoking gun to tie up the loose ends is 'both cases are different'.

He wasn't so accepting when he constantly asked the 'Why do the Camry Crows have such paltry sponsorship revenue?' question 100 times, did he? Why do you think he's had a change of tone when the boot is on the other foot?

Hmmm...?

Opinion based arguments are never resolved. You somehow believe the cases are similar I cannot see this similarity.

PS. No Camry Crowster was able to adequately explain why the Camry Crows have such a paltry amount of sponsoship revenue, so whenever another diversion was attempted I simply tried to get the thread back on topic.
 
Regardless, we all know Port Adelaide are an embarrassment.

Well, I honestly never thought they were until the 2007 GF. From that point on though, its been one disaster after another to the point where I actually do wish they would have some success again.

As funny as all this dumb banter is, it was certainly more vicious when I had to be subjected to the PAFC cheer squad back in the day! Those guys certainly were unforgiving!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Opinion based arguments are never resolved. You somehow believe the cases are similar I cannot see this similarity.

PS. No Camry Crowster was able to adequately explain why the Camry Crows have such a paltry amount of sponsoship revenue, so whenever another diversion was attempted I simply tried to get the thread back on topic.

Just as you couldn't be expected to answer the inconsistencies in Port Adelaide's risk management strategies and policies, since you (I presume) are not privy to what goes on behind closed doors there.

To me, the inconsistency is blatant and obvious as anything, but if you don't believe so, then that's fine.

I could easily come up with five possible reasons as to why they don't have robust sponsorship revenue levels as its an area I have previously had (limited) experience in, but without information or data to back it up - it would merely be speculation and opinion as well.
 
That's a very abstract avatar of him!


Oh yeah, the guy that was in my avatar. That's actually a close up of his '77 World Series Game 3 jersey.

Here he is - the greatest catcher that ever was

image.jpg
 
Opinion based arguments are never resolved. You somehow believe the cases are similar I cannot see this similarity.

PS. No Camry Crowster was able to adequately explain why the Camry Crows have such a paltry amount of sponsoship revenue, so whenever another diversion was attempted I simply tried to get the thread back on topic.

Like I said, I remember presenting viable reasons to you in bullet point form (reasons I know deep down you would be aware of), and that's even without me having any knowledge of how the club works. Were they not adequate?
 
Oh yeah, the guy that was in my avatar. That's actually a close up of his '77 World Series Game 3 jersey.

Here he is - the greatest catcher that ever was

image.jpg
He caught the ball, he threw the ball, he caught the ball, he threw the ball.
baseball must be right up there with golf as the most boring spectator sports ever:thumbsdown:
 
Hang on, is that a personal attack against Thurman Munson or me? I thought you frowned upon unsubstantiated personal attacks? :confused:

Did PornotashMoron start a thread about Port after GWS won a NAB Cup game?

You could bring up any world issue, past or present, and I could find a way to troll Port about it. That's the beauty of your club's current predicament, and what's even better is that you guys do all the work!

OK here is an issue. "A true sign of failure is going 13 years without a Grand Final appearance". OK find a way to troll Port. :thumbsu:

Can I just get some clarification on this - it's okay to troll Port in your eyes but only if its related to Port itself? So trolling you guys on something unrelated to the club (gee, thats never happened on this board before) is out of line?

Some trolling is just plain pathetic. This thread for example.:thumbsu:

If Port actually came out and said they want to win the NAB Cup after hypothetically getting to the GF, would you be surprised if Camry Crows flogs didn't make fun of Port because of that? I know I wouldn't be surprised.....

I am happy we are treating the NAB Cup as trial matches and testing out our kids.
 
He caught the ball, he threw the ball, he caught the ball, he threw the ball.
baseball must be right up there with golf as the most boring spectator sports ever:thumbsdown:

Normally, I would strongly disagree, but when you base an argument on such strong scrutiny, I don't think I can.
 
I made an incorrect statement saying that Port was the first club to lose to the Suns last year. I admit I was wrong, although when and if Port lose to GWS this year in the major round, it does still present an opportunity to mock Port again.

As usual, my 'self-ownership' generates much derision. As it should.

Hang on, am I diverting now?

GWS has two cracks at the Camry Crows before they play Port. You're more likely to lose to them than us.

I expect Phil Davis, Boges and Chad to have big games against you lot. :thumbsu:
 
Just as you couldn't be expected to answer the inconsistencies in Port Adelaide's risk management strategies and policies, since you (I presume) are not privy to what goes on behind closed doors there.

To me, the inconsistency is blatant and obvious as anything, but if you don't believe so, then that's fine.

There was no inconsistency as the two cases are different.

I could easily come up with five possible reasons as to why they don't have robust sponsorship revenue levels as its an area I have previously had (limited) experience in, but without information or data to back it up - it would merely be speculation and opinion as well.

I did say "adequate" explanation.
 
Did PornotashMoron start a thread about Port after GWS won a NAB Cup game?



OK here is an issue. "A true sign of failure is going 13 years without a Grand Final appearance". OK find a way to troll Port. :thumbsu:



Some trolling is just plain pathetic. This thread for example.:thumbsu:



I am happy we are treating the NAB Cup as trial matches and testing out our kids.

First off, I love how you say 'Sad isn't it?'. In what size lettering would you like me to admit I was wrong (based on the NAB Cup technicality)? How about 36 size? I even admitted to a non-Port supporter! You are just too much my dear D_One!

Anyway, 'back on topic'.....

No, thurman munson did. I find it an unsubstantiated attack because (even though its an analogy) you have no proof that Akron, Ohio's finest was even in pr0n! Dave Winfield or Reggie Jackson maybe, but Munson? Oh no no..

I disagree with that statement, firstly, but if I could find a way to troll Port, I would have to say that it would be better to not be in a GF for 13 years then get r*ped on the big stage and attain unwanted infamy. What do you think most people would remember more - Camry Crows not making a GF for 13.5 years or Port getting monumentally shamed on the big stage? Better to take a rain check on dinner then get r*ped for the main course.

All trolling is pathetic, which is why it is funny for most people, the people that see it as stupid banter and don't get their knickers in a knot. Do you think starting a thread on a Crows player being 'in the vicinity' of an alleged incident in order to troll the Camry Crows culture is pathetic trolling? I don't, because I see it for what it is, based on your underlying rationale directed towards my ill-fated thread here, you must also think it is was pathetic. I bet you won't admit it though.

"I am happy we are treating the NAB Cup as trial matches and testing out our kids"

This doesn't answer my question. Its a yes or no question. Would you be surprised or wouldn't you?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Port Power cruelly denied another historic achievement

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top