Needs more RothamHere's my WCE BF board whipping boy power rankings for the preseason
1 Gaff
2 Witherden
3 Williams
4 Petruccelle
5 Cripps
6 Waterman
7 Sheed
8 HEdwards
9 Duggan
10 Shuey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Needs more RothamHere's my WCE BF board whipping boy power rankings for the preseason
1 Gaff
2 Witherden
3 Williams
4 Petruccelle
5 Cripps
6 Waterman
7 Sheed
8 HEdwards
9 Duggan
10 Shuey
I land in Perth about an hour prior to this - considering heading straight to Lathlain from the airport
I reckon Williams is higher... for nowHere's my WCE BF board whipping boy power rankings for the preseason
1 Gaff
2 Witherden
3 Williams
4 Petruccelle
5 Cripps
6 Waterman
7 Sheed
8 HEdwards
9 Duggan
10 Shuey
I land in Perth about an hour prior to this - considering heading straight to Lathlain from the airport
and thats why you are a w️LOL I do all 3 of those things.
Honestly cannot fault this.Here's my WCE BF board whipping boy power rankings for the preseason
1 Gaff
2 Witherden
3 Williams
4 Petruccelle
5 Cripps
6 Waterman
7 Sheed
8 HEdwards
9 Duggan
10 Shuey
Needs more Rotham
Rotham and Darling both with solid preseasons and flying a bit under the radar, I reckon. Darling as well finished last year well enough to avoid the list, but he's always one gimp dropped mark away from shooting back up there.Honestly cannot fault this.
Darling stiff to miss.
Sounds like you're itching to get to see this scratch match.I land in Perth about an hour prior to this - considering heading straight to Lathlain from the airport
Have them come in 1 day a week maybe to touch base. Id say after a couple of years the older guys would know what to be doingWould you really need a full time dietician? What would they do for 40 hours a week and 50 or so weeks a year? I would have thought you could have one you pay a consulting fee to to come up with a program for each player maybe.
Here's my WCE BF board whipping boy power rankings for the preseason
1 Gaff
2 Witherden
3 Williams
4 Petruccelle
5 Cripps
6 Waterman
7 Sheed
8 HEdwards
9 Duggan
10 Shuey
SO inconsistent!Do it. Need rolling updates on how s**t Culley is
Get some Nisbett in there!Here's my WCE BF board whipping boy power rankings for the preseason
1 Gaff
2 Witherden
3 Williams
4 Petruccelle
5 Cripps
6 Waterman
7 Sheed
8 HEdwards
9 Duggan
10 Shuey
Trev or Toddy?Get some Nisbett in there!
Trev or Toddy?
It may seem trifling to the likes of you, but I have it on good advice it is dietitian. Well blow me down with a featherWould you really need a full time dietician? What would they do for 40 hours a week and 50 or so weeks a year? I would have thought you could have one you pay a consulting fee to to come up with a program for each player maybe.
I think a decision has been made for financial reasons at board level to prioritise wins over development in order to prevent a bottoming out and Simpson has been given a directive to get us out of the bottom 4 at any and all costs, including dramatically slowing down player development. Thats why all the old players are still getting new contracts and appear to be being preferred in the 22.I figure Shuey and Nic Nat will take care of themselves. Their bodies are cooked and they won't play many games. Could even retire mid season.
Hurn is still in good form, so if the kids want his spot they'll have to earn it.
Gaff is the problem to me. If he plays like he did on Friday (lots of possession but lots of turnovers) he should be dropped, but I doubt the club will do it because they're stressing over him being one of the highest paid players at the club.
I think a decision has been made for financial reasons at board level to prioritise wins over development in order to prevent a bottoming out and Simpson has been given a directive to get us out of the bottom 4 at any and all costs, including dramatically slowing down player development. Thats why all the old players are still getting new contracts and appear to be being preferred in the 22.
Simply using your draft picks, as opposed to trading them away, isn't prioritising the draft. It isn't some special state of affairs that rarely happens that inferences can be drawn from. It is just the normal state of affairs. Most clubs in most years use their top 30 draft picks. Or if they trade them the trade involves minimal movement in draft position such as trading pick 20 for pick 25 and a role player. The Tim Kelly and Luke Jackson deals where you completely trade out your early picks for an established player is the exception, not the norm. The mere act of using your picks and not doing a trade such as that is not prioritising the draft. Prioritising the draft would be trading out a bunch of tradeable players over 27 years old, and therefore not in your 5 year premiership plan, for draft picks, ala Hawthorn last year.That’s quite the long bow you’ve drawn there
If the priority truly was wins over development I doubt we’re prioritising the draft like we have the last 2 seasons for a start
The only “old” players given new contracts at the end of last year were -
Naitanui- a necessity given our ruck stocks
Hurn - one of our best and most reliable defenders last year despite his age. Also happened to be among our best against Port
Shuey - club captain who they’ve backed to get his body right. Arguably could have been encouraged to retire last year but I don’t think he’s holding us back
Chesser, Ginbey, Hewed and Long are all being discussed as early season debutants, possibly as early as round 1
Wow, there's the a few wild conspiracy theories in there......glad you're not on the "Board".I think a decision has been made for financial reasons at board level to prioritise wins over development in order to prevent a bottoming out and Simpson has been given a directive to get us out of the bottom 4 at any and all costs, including dramatically slowing down player development. Thats why all the old players are still getting new contracts and appear to be being preferred in the 22.
That’s quite the long bow you’ve drawn there
If the priority truly was wins over development I doubt we’re prioritising the draft like we have the last 2 seasons for a start
The only “old” players given new contracts at the end of last year were -
Naitanui- a necessity given our ruck stocks
Hurn - one of our best and most reliable defenders last year despite his age. Also happened to be among our best against Port
Shuey - club captain who they’ve backed to get his body right. Arguably could have been encouraged to retire last year but I don’t think he’s holding us back
Chesser, Ginbey, Hewed and Long are all being discussed as early season debutants, possibly as early as round 1
It's clear to me that the elections for board members, coaching staff and team leaders was rigged by a cabal of satan worshippers determined to destroy the club.I think a decision has been made for financial reasons at board level to prioritise wins over development in order to prevent a bottoming out and Simpson has been given a directive to get us out of the bottom 4 at any and all costs, including dramatically slowing down player development. Thats why all the old players are still getting new contracts and appear to be being preferred in the 22.
Trew, Winder, Clark, Jamieson, Bazzo, Hough, Williams, Ginbey, Hewett, Baker, Dewar, Long, Burgiel and Hunt agree with you, they were clearly not a priority consideration during the last couple of drafts. Your insight into the inner workings of WC is without parallel.Simply using your draft picks, as opposed to trading them away, isn't prioritising the draft. It isn't some special state of affairs that rarely happens that inferences can be drawn from. It is just the normal state of affairs. Most clubs in most years use their top 30 draft picks. Or if they trade them the trade involves minimal movement in draft position such as trading pick 20 for pick 25 and a role player. The Tim Kelly and Luke Jackson deals where you completely trade out your early picks for an established player is the exception, not the norm. The mere act of using your picks and not doing a trade such as that is not prioritising the draft. Prioritising the draft would be trading out a bunch of tradeable players over 27 years old, and therefore not in your 5 year premiership plan, for draft picks, ala Hawthorn last year.