- Jun 12, 2018
- 5,024
- 9,399
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
I’d take Amiss over JuhYou're right. If Brayshaw was a month younger, we'd have 5.
Amiss has played 20 less games but has more assists and only 20 less goals which he will achieve with ease
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d take Amiss over JuhYou're right. If Brayshaw was a month younger, we'd have 5.
JuH is getting by on hype. Gut feel is it will click for him at some point but he doesn't deserve the fawning he's getting.I’d take Amiss over Juh
Amiss has played 20 less games but has more assists and only 20 less goals which he will achieve with ease
I would also take georgiadies above JuHJuH is getting by on hype. Gut feel is it will click for him at some point but he doesn't deserve the fawning he's getting.
Well have Kysaiah soon too, 25 in June 26!You're right. If Brayshaw was a month younger, we'd have 5.
he did string together a very impressive run of games this season where he was absolutely dominant. if he could kick straighter and be more consistent across games hed be the best forward, at least straight goals wise, by farJuH is getting by on hype. Gut feel is it will click for him at some point but he doesn't deserve the fawning he's getting.
Bro I'm sorry but this assessment is not correct imo. I have watched him play at SFFC and he does not have problems finding the ball. Also he is nothing like Mundy. He is an exciting prospect but this year I want to see his capacity to win the hard ball.Toby Whan might not be as prolific a ball winner or as strong at this stage as as Rodriguez or Swadling but his gliding movement and the long kicking is very promising - dare I say it there is something almost David Mundy about him (doesn't have the size of Mundy though).
I propose we stick to laconic and just let it mean what everyone thinks it means.Ok
Suggesting a ban on “laconic” when describing Cox…. (Effectively immediately!)
But lacksidaisical” doesnt quite work either
So proposing “languid” to describe how cox looks when playing.
Thoughts on this serious topic please?
Yeah. He is a bit tentative from the little I have seen.Bro I'm sorry but this assessment is not correct imo. I have watched him play at SFFC and he does not have problems finding the ball. Also he is nothing like Mundy. He is an exciting prospect but this year I want to see his capacity to win the hard ball.
I propose we stick to laconic and just let it mean what everyone thinks it means.
"Lacksapraisical"?Ok
Suggesting a ban on “laconic” when describing Cox…. (Effectively immediately!)
But lacksidaisical” doesnt quite work either
So proposing “languid” to describe how cox looks when playing.
Thoughts on this serious topic please?
Cody Curtin & Fred Rodriguez from next year's draft cohort to train with us.
The top 2025 draft prospects training at your club this summer
Some of the top draft prospects for 2025 will be training at AFL clubs over summerwww.afl.com.au
Yeah nah. Have to disagree on that one. To me they are line-ball with JUH slightly in front.I would also take georgiadies above JuH
Think most on here are severly underrating JUH just because he was overhyped long before he became good, and beacause his goal kicking needs a bit of work. But still, 80 goals in the past two seasons as a KPF aged 21 and 22 is quite good.Yeah nah. Have to disagree on that one. To me they are line-ball with JUH slightly in front.
English is one of those pesky living languages, and word definitions absolutely change and are ignored. Heaps of examples, but they’re mostly swear words or insults now…This is possibly the strangest post I’ve ever read. I’m not on here often enough to know all the different personalities, so I hope this is a joke. Definitions of words can be ignored now?
Anyway, appreciate the reports.
On iPhone using ][emoji6]][emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]BigFooty.com mobile app
We have 4, next highest club has 2.
Amiss was pretty average last year.Amiss pretty stiff too TBH.
Are you talking actual last year (2023 aka his actual 2nd year) or last year as in last season (2024 aka his third year). He actually had more shots on goal in 2024 than 2023, he was also more inaccurate, which diluted his output obviously. Marginally more disposals too.Amiss was pretty average last year.
Second year blues and all that.
Are you talking actual last year (2023 aka his actual 2nd year) or last year as in last season (2024 aka his third year). He actually had more shots on goal in 2024 than 2023, he was also more inaccurate, which diluted his output obviously. Marginally more disposals too.
So while he didn't make the great leap we'd hoped for, it wasn't a (great) step back either really. Just a plateau.
Good news is the great leap is still to come!!
I would also take georgiadies above JuH
How about Jordy Clark? Just cos he is not a mid but he was picked in the extended AA squad this year. He's 24 and i reckon hes got at least Bergman and Wardlaw and Reid at presentAmiss pretty stiff too TBH.
How about Jordy Clark? Just cos he is not a mid but he was picked in the extended AA squad this year. He's 24 and i reckon hes got at least Bergman and Wardlaw and Reid at present