West Coast seem to be the best example of a team that follows the cyclical nature of the league that's intended with the draft. Premiers in the mid-90s, bottom 4 in the early 2000s, premiers in 2006, wooden spooners in 2010, Grand Finalists in 2015 and Premiers in 2018, wooden spooners in 2023. Give them another 3-5 years and they'll probably win another flag.I still honestly don't get the doom and gloom about playing for the Eagles. Have people seriously not followed this league for any longer than 3 years?
History suggests that the Eagles will win their next flag before at least a dozen other teams. And as I've posted earlier, maybe in some other thread, there has not ever been a 10-year Eagles player who has missed playing in a premiership team (barring injury eg. Nic Nat).
Reid would be mad to think he's got a higher chance of success long term elsewhere. If that is truly what drives him.
As for Reid, I'm sure in a perfect world he'd rather stay in Victoria but that's not to say he's going to hate it in WA. West Coast are as well resourced as any club in the AFL and their players are treating like rockstars over in the Perth who regularly play in front of 60k sell out crowds. So it's not as if he'd feel like he's massively missing out in that sense. The biggest factor IMO will be if West Coast can achieve enough on field success while he's with them to convince him to re-sign. That seems to be the biggest challenge for rebuilding teams and mandatory three year contracts should help in that regard.
Joe Daniher was also held to his contract by Essendon when he wanted to go to Sydney and left a year later when he became a free agent. I think it's something we're going to see more often with teams that are in a rebuilding phase because they know if they can just hold on a little longer then it might click and usually on field success convinces young players to stick around because they tend to want a shot at premiership glory. Ridiculous money can obviously trump that though.Not true, just recently Dunkley was held to his contract by the Dogs and Tim Kelly was held to his by Geelong just to name a couple
You're right. The Eagles should draft him if they think he's the best available player, but that doesn't mean they aren't thinking about possible retention issues later down the track. Is JHF a better player than Sheezel or Wardlaw? If the answer is yes then North should have kept him going by your logic. North also decided to trade away pick 1 (Cadman) in the same trade so consider that when you're answering the question. The Roos were clearly concerned about keep JHF long term and just decided to rip the band aid off a year early instead of going through a painful 12 months of constant rumour/innuendo.The "pressure"
if Reid is the best player available at West Coast's pick I think they will draft him.