List Mgmt. Priddis Signs On Again

[squashface]

Are we contending next year?

No.

So why would we have any interest in somebody like Priddis as 'insurance'?

It's a rubbish decision.

Whilst I agree with this and why play him as insurance when we can give a young bloke like Partington or Venables a go as that depth, him being WAFL depth is the best way this shit situation can go so all we can do is hope for that.

But there's time for that later, I do want to melt now.

 

[MrKK]

Oh.

Guess I take BigFooty too seriously then.



Doesn't make much sense for a club to sign on a player who is clearly declining and expect them to be our main midfielder next season.

If it seems stupid to you, why would the club do it other then to provide injury cover?

Because this club makes a lot of decisions that both look, and are, stupid. Just add this to the collection.

 

[Doughboy]

I'm bored now...

 

[Suma Magic]

Hopefully they are working hard on finalising Butler's next deal.

 

[Keys]

 

[Turboman1994]

Big Luc knows whats up

Rare insight amongst drivel

 

[Godfather32]

View attachment 379623

Another top notch tackle there by Priddis

 

[WCErevival]

 

[kranky al]

Got sent this pic of a meeting of the onevfl association today

 

[CM9000]

Video was done on the GC, so before the GC game so I doubt that.

Even so, the 2 losses prior and the criticism that came with it were pretty bad.

What did you think of the decision to play Mitch Brown in the forward pocket in last years elimination final?

It isn't really the same as signing an aging player.

Because this club makes a lot of decisions that both look, and are, stupid. Just add this to the collection.

Well, most of them were bad in hindsight, so I wouldn't say it's exactly a pattern.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Thanks Crazy Vozzo.
It has been worth it just for the melts

 

[kerr87]

Priddis to play one out in the forward line next year when he can't run as fast as he does now.

 

[Godfather32]

Even so, the 2 losses prior and the criticism that came with it were pretty bad.



It isn't really the same as signing an aging player.



Well, most of them were bad in hindsight, so I wouldn't say it's exactly a pattern.

Was just interested in your answer because you always seem to overwhelmingly support everything the club does.

Also I don't believe that most of the poor decisions they've made were just bad in hindsight, plenty of them have been called out as poor as soon as they were made.

 

[fullbull]

Honestly, have you ever said anything positive?

If you're criticising someone who in your opinion is always negative, would this really be the time to bring it up, when 95% of people agree with him? Seems pretty stupid.

 

[JohnW]

I would rather we play max darling then priddis

 

[Godfather32]

Priddis to play one out in the forward line next year when he can't run as fast as he does now.

Like the fat kid in under 10s that you just shove in the forward pocket because it's the place he can do the least damage?

 

[kerr87]

Like the fat kid in under 10s that you just shove in the forward pocket because it's the place he can do the least damage?

Simpson's been at the U10's games developing a new game plan. I like it.

 

[Keys]

I would rather we play max darling then priddis

The way it's going they might get to play together

 

[JohnW]

The way it's going they might get to play together

That post is the silver lining of this news. Bravo sir

 

[Monocle]

Went on Facebook was not disappointed Christ we have some ******ed chardanay sipping supporters

Ok so I get that your a supporter of the re-signing.

 

[Monocle]

View attachment 379623

Even backwards...... seems like a Club endorsed matra.

 

[CM9000]

Was just interested in your answer because you always seem to overwhelmingly support everything the club does.

I'm not saying signing Priddis was a good thing, I'm just trying to find some reason in it before jumping to conclusions.

Also I don't believe that most of the poor decisions they've made were just bad in hindsight, plenty of them have been called out as poor as soon as they were made.

Besides trading a first for Redden, I don't recall any awful decisions we've made in the last 2 seasons regarding list management.

 

[Ochre]

The way it's going they might get to play together

I don't expect Jack to still be playing in 24 years time.

 

[Eagleboy68]

Oh.

Guess I take BigFooty too seriously then.



Doesn't make much sense for a club to sign on a player who is clearly declining and expect them to be our main midfielder next season.

If it seems stupid to you, why would the club do it other then to provide injury cover?

Injury cover for whom?
Priddis will be slower by foot and reflex moreso next year. Not to mention his disposal will drop off even further.

The only person he could realistically be injury cover for is Masten and Masten has better disposal by foot...just, and this isn't saying much at all.

Make no mistake, he isn't injury cover. He will play 22 games if not injured himself purely because he is Matt golden boy priddis, the player who disinfected our image and took us down this long inexorably painful path of mediocrity.

R.I.P. excellence at West coast.

 

[Turboman1994]

Ok so I get that your a supporter of the re-signing.

Poorly worded by me. What I meant to say I was expecting hordes of silly opinions and I was correct something like that