Proposal to include premierships dating back to 1870 gathering pace

Remove this Banner Ad

Oh you're completely right. But this isn't even the biggest objection. Ol' Col wants to count flags for years where the Association awarded no premiership, but for which some drunken journo yobs decided, long after the fact, to award some.

So hes counting non flags as flags, and real flags as void.

The man's reasoning is less sound than Gills integrity.
Imagine if Robbo got to decide this year's premier
 

Log in to remove this ad.

? Carter just wants to restore football history, nothing more.
It is still there in football history. No one is saying it is or should be erased or needs to be restored. It is recognised for what it was, a colonial time competition. It just can’t possibly be counted in the AFL premierships tally. It was a completey different competition, with completely different formats, not just a name change like 1989-1990. Sorry this is flawed argument.
 
It is still there in football history. No one is saying it is or should be erased or needs to be restored. It is recognised for what it was, a colonial time competition. It just can’t possibly be counted in the AFL premierships tally. It was a completey different competition, with completely different formats, not just a name change like 1989-1990. Sorry this is flawed argument.
You should come 👍.

Screenshot_20240627_132105_Chrome.jpg
 
Literally what difference does it make? It doesn’t change who won anything. Does it mean that you have to clap for longer for Geelong or Sydney? Do you have to doff your hat to their supporters?

It literally doesn’t change anything. This doesn’t matter. Go outside, have a look at some trees or something

“doff your hat”. Love it!
 
I can understand the thinking of the clubs, journalists and supporters in the early years of the VFL breakaway that they still counted their flags in the VFA and before it.

Imagine if in 2025 - Adelaide, Brisbane, Carlton, ,Geelong, Hawthorn, Melbourne, North Melbourne, Richmond, Sydney and West Coast break out from the AFL and start a new League OSAFL (Old School AFL).

The AFL still continues and are bitter rivals.

Pretty hard to go back to 0 Premierships even that is the official stats in the new League.

Past glories from the AFL days maybe printed 20-30 years after the break-away but eventually they will rightly be erased in the OSAFL because it has nothing to do with the AFL.

Sorry for the mumbled up words… but you get what I’m trying to point out?
 
Have to agree with the words of terrybull
By acknowledging the premiers of the previous VFA competition, it would present an element of gravitas or significance (perhaps even some prestige) to the fledgling VFL which had no real history of its own to report in the early years.
Once the VFL was firmly established, and the VFA history had served its purpose, then it could be dropped with solely VFL information (particularly premierships) retained.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Clubs are free to include premierships from any competition in their history - but that doesn't mean they equate to the same thing as a national cup

SANFL
WAFL
VFA
VFL
AFL
(VFL/AFL can be combined)

Ie Port Adelaide should include their SANFL premierships in their combined tally - but it's not the same as their AFL premiership - of which they have 1.

And Melbourne is welcome to include their historic state league premierships - but it's not the same as their AFL premiership - of which they also have 1.

Combined VFL/AFL tallys are ok - it's a continuous competition - but old premierships should not be referred to as AFL premierships without the "VFL" reference.
 
Bit of an interesting one here, a Twitter thread to read if you’re so inclined…



Carter pushed this hard and even tried to get it verified by the Guiness Book of World Records.

It then gets repeated as fact all over the place.

It’s just simply untrue.

This seems to be Carter’s MO - trying to misrepresent history to give his own cause a nice marketing spin. He does it with this Ford sponsorship and he’s trying to do it with the history of football to suit Geelong.
 
Sorry I started rambling and didn't answer your q. There have been a number of additonal pushes, and it was spoken about most recently at a meeting amongst the Presidents last week. He has also released a book about it as you probably know.

View attachment 2031510

Amazing the lengths a man will go to in order to present a historically middle of the road club as successful.
 
Bit of an interesting one here, a Twitter thread to read if you’re so inclined…



Carter pushed this hard and even tried to get it verified by the Guiness Book of World Records.

It then gets repeated as fact all over the place.

It’s just simply untrue.

This seems to be Carter’s MO - trying to misrepresent history to give his own cause a nice marketing spin. He does it with this Ford sponsorship and he’s trying to do it with the history of football to suit Geelong.

Where does it say it's not true?
 
"The Forgotten Years" [not actually forgotten]: "Reclaiming" [inventing] "the AFLs" [there was no AFL at that time] "Competition's" [not actually a single competition, conflates 2 and there were many others he ignores] "Earliest Era 1870-1896" [not actually the earliest era].

This bungfoodling ninny can't even complete the title of his book without getting it 100% wrong.

Can Colin please write another book: 'The Dank years, 2006-2010: how a bunch of their players went bald and grew the biggest mf muscles you ever saw".
 
Literally what difference does it make? It doesn’t change who won anything. Does it mean that you have to clap for longer for Geelong or Sydney? Do you have to doff your hat to their supporters?

It literally doesn’t change anything. This doesn’t matter. Go outside, have a look at some trees or something
Its vitally important to add weight to Bigfooty shit fights to assert dominance
 
Didn't the AFL commission Carter to write a report on the viability of a Tasmanian team?

Sure hope he wasn't as loose with reality about that as he is with these other topics.

To be fair, for starters:

- it isn’t ‘his’ Wikipedia page. I dare say a cats fan, like almost all Wikipedia pages has put that together. So attributing it to him or the club is as loose with reality as any claim of his.

- he has actually done the right thing in at least seeking to have the claim verified by GWR. I don’t doubt that he’s traded off it for years and spruiked it but it seems what he’s said is that it is ‘believed’ to be and then he’s tried to get it confirmed.

- I’m sure at some stage somebody would have made him aware of sports teams born out of companies who maintain that link but he would have traded off the technicality of sponsorship between a club and a company rather than maybe ownership or creation etc.

As far as the premiership thing goes, I don’t think there is any need to question someone’s relationship with reality. You either agree with the stance that the VFA was at that stage the top tier competition and the flags won then should count, or you don’t.

I personally don’t, others do. I don’t think it’s a sign of his adherence to sanity.
 
VFA flags included in early vfl records but dropped after a couple of decades

SURELY it’s time to drop VFL flags from the AFL tally

As noted, clubs themselves can document all their successes



By the way, Footscray 10 VFA flags, but did yet join VFL till 1925. How are those treat
 
Last edited:
To be fair, for starters:

- it isn’t ‘his’ Wikipedia page. I dare say a cats fan, like almost all Wikipedia pages has put that together. So attributing it to him or the club is as loose with reality as any claim of his.
Obviously no one is stating Carter owns the Wikipedia page. The following link is a speech he gave, including in the company of the current Prime Minister. "I also acknowledge all of our sponsors – and in particular our major sponsor Ford and chief executive, Bob Graziano. Ford has supported our club for 88 years in what is the longest running sports sponsorship in the world." https://www.geelongcats.com.au/news/116687/presidents-speech
- he has actually done the right thing in at least seeking to have the claim verified by GWR. I don’t doubt that he’s traded off it for years and spruiked it but it seems what he’s said is that it is ‘believed’ to be and then he’s tried to get it confirmed.
See above. You've inserted the word 'believed', Carter himself stated it as fact.
- I’m sure at some stage somebody would have made him aware of sports teams born out of companies who maintain that link but he would have traded off the technicality of sponsorship between a club and a company rather than maybe ownership or creation etc.
Why does that matter? Why is that a technicality? Another example of being loose with reality if he knew of those clubs and still touted the line about Ford and Geelong.
As far as the premiership thing goes, I don’t think there is any need to question someone’s relationship with reality. You either agree with the stance that the VFA was at that stage the top tier competition and the flags won then should count, or you don’t.
The reality is that the VFA is a different competition to the VFL/AFL. That's not an opinion, it's fact. The byline of his book reads "Reclaiming the AFL Competition’s earliest years―1870 to 1896". Simply stated, it wasn't the AFL (/VFL) competition so to claim the AFL Competition's earliest years were from 1870, as he has done, is disingenuous.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Proposal to include premierships dating back to 1870 gathering pace

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top