Play Nice Random Chat Thread VII

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I posted a video for you to watch and you haven't commented on it.

Ive read your article. I'll comment on it once you comment on the video. It's not a one way street.

Have you got a transcript. I'd rather read stuff.

He constantly simped for Putin. But I reject the premise of your statement that I ever accused him of that in connection to murdered Russian journalists. That's you twisting the narrative maliciously because you can't win an argument on facts alone.

No he didn't. He just didn't simp for Ukraine. You might not realise but there's a difference.

Then he'd post stuff about how the war was going to hang shit on people spreading propaganda and to provide an other pov. You people act as if 2022 or even Maidan happened out of nowhere without context. Putin might be ****ed but that doesn't mean all that other shit with the US interfering for years didn't happen and didn't turn a peaceful, potentially profitable relationship with Europe into this war. This has always been about preventing Putin building a mutually beneficial, profitable relationship with Europe by supplying them gas.

It suits US interests to prevent Eurasia from developing closer ties. That was the basis of his criticism of the situation. Its not just "Russian propaganda" its also true. The fact that for the majority of the last 10 years the people leading the charge against Putin were the people inspire the likes of Brenton Tarrant should give you reason to reflect on whats going on. Its not just Russian propaganda either.

The reason Russia can use this propaganda is because there's truth in it.

Putin can say "but the Nazis" cos there are Nazis. He's only in Eastern Ukraine cos he wants to control those resources and doesn't want the Western Oligarchy (of which the campaigners backing Trump are just a faction) controlling them but we have given him a great cover for that (and without the propaganda its a good enough reason anyway for most of the developing world because the IMF and western interests have screwed them all for decades centuries.)

If you or your homophobic, racist mates in those other threads ever acknowledged that then we could have had a discussion about what is right, what is wrong and how much support should we give Ukraine and why but all we ever got was the same sort of abuse you lot heaped on MAGA loons and the people you call "COVID Cookers".

You'd constantly badger SLF for simping to someone he views as a murderous thug (when all he was doing was pointing out what is happening) and don't think you're carrying out a more sophisticated form of abuse and doing it simply cos you disagree with him?

And you were nasty about it because you couldn't argue with the concept. You just don't like it cos the truth paints Putin as less of a monster than you want him painted.

Its shithouse behaviour.
 
Oh, and I'm going to stop posting about him because this is boring, but since you screenshotted him in a poor attempt at a "gotcha" Val Keating, as a reminder (and as usual), Warlord was full of shit when he said he only cheered when the Russians blew up "nazis".

Here he is celebrating Russian attacks against Leopard tanks (nothing to do with "Azov");

View attachment 2189282


View attachment 2189283


And he frequently posted Russian combat footage without comment but with the heavy implication that he was supporting this 'side', seeing as he literally never posted similar Ukrainian footage. IE;


View attachment 2189285

So... please spare me this nonsense.
There are threads on the MB that Warlord agreed not to post in with the admin of the site that are full of that stuff.

He was posting his stuff here, where he could to provide a counterpoint to the constant ramping up of Ukrainian success while ignoring Russian success and Ukrainian failures, the other threads were one sided propaganda and conveyed a false impression of how this war was unfolding. Why should he provide both sides of an argument when the other side wasn't prepared to do the same thing?
 
FFS please keep the covid talk in the covid thrread and the foreign poltics back in the devils chessboard thread , even if this means the mods unfreeze it.,
It would be nice if they did. We started that thread for that reason.
 
Lol there was barely an ‘it’s. Meanwhile zuck has ‘donated’ 1m to trump and musk has used Twitter to bankroll a candidate.

Literal crickets from you guys.

I’m trying to think of a footy example you all can wrap your frontal lobes around.

Imagine you’re banging on about how bad our defense is. And you use 2 examples of player A being out of position during a season to demonstrate why it’s bad. “Hang him, he’s EEEEEVIL”, you all cry hysterically.

Meanwhile defender B gets ragfolled for 10 goals a game by his opponent every game and you’re like “well, can’t do much when the delivery is so clean. It’s a system issue”.




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 
You’re saying covid vax = cancer.

You’re a cooker. And most probably a bull shit artist.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Am I? I thought I was just telling you COVID VAX may have contributed to my cancer diagnosis. I don't know who you hang out with but making up a story to have something you don't have is pretty ****ing low. I'm fairly certain that I was not saying it definitely contributed - I do doubt your ability to read though. But then again, like Chad, you keep fighting the good fight alongside other absolute peasants, you deserve nothing more. I'm actually glad you're somewhat intelligent, at least you (and Chad for that matter as difficult as it is to say) are a half a chance.

Gore Vidal said there was one party in the US - the property party. You don't need to read the twitter files to be aware of that worldview.
Welcome to Gore; probably one of the smartest men to ever walk the planet. Absolutely love Gore, also love C.Hitchens who took over his work (really) despite going a bit to the 'right' later in life.... You can probably fill me in to who you think took over from Vidal/C.Hitchens - don't mind a bit of P. Hitchens but miss C.
 
No he didn't. He just didn't simp for Ukraine. You might not realise but there's a difference.

Yeah, nah.

I don't want to get too deep into this because he's gone now and we can just move on without him easily enough, but I absolutely and unequivocally reject your assertion that he wasn't pro-Russian.

He also wasn't just "providing the other POV". He unabashedly celebrated Russian wins, and lamented Russian losses. He rallied against the sanctions imposed on Russia and frequently reposted Russian propaganda about how strong the Russian economy was despite the "western sanctions". He defended Putin repeatedly, and then would occasionally throwout a "oh but he's a tyrant" as if that little statement would provide him cover for all the enthusiastic cheerleading that preceded it - the geopolitical equivalent of absolutely bullying someone but then adding a "no offense" at the end of your rant. He posted combat footage of Russian successes and then attempted to discredit any similar Ukranian footage as fake, propaganda, or akshually a sign of how Russia was winning. At the start of the conflict he literally posted that Russia would control Kyiv "very soon", and then repeatedly denied ever saying this, despite it being there for all to see.

If you and the 'clique' couldn't see what he was doing and why, then that's an issue for you folks to grapple with. Maybe you're being genuine when you say that you have never been pro-Russian, but that doesn't mean that MaddAdam/Simpkin/SLF/Warlord wasn't.

This has always been about preventing Putin building a mutually beneficial, profitable relationship with Europe by supplying them gas.

LOL no.

Not even going to unpack that, other than to laugh at it and say Russia was selling gas to Europe just fine before they invaded the sovereign territory of another nation which resulted in sanctions being imposed on them. If they'd just kept their dick in their proverbial pants, then them selling gas would have continued unabated and no one was complaining.

And you were nasty about it because you couldn't argue with the concept. You just don't like it cos the truth paints Putin as less of a monster than you want him painted.

I argued the concept frequently, both here and on the 'mainboard' threads with other people who claim Russia was provoked and the invasion was justified and NATO and America are the great satan. But guess what; the only thread I ever received actual bullying and abuse was in the chessboard thread from your mob.
 
There are threads on the MB that Warlord agreed not to post in with the admin of the site that are full of that stuff.

Just like how convicted meth cooks "agree" with the Magistrate to go to jail after being convicted?


Why should he provide both sides of an argument when the other side wasn't prepared to do the same thing?

Do you hear yourself when you make these ridiculous arguments? You bend over backwards trying to ignore the obvious truth that even blind freddy can see clearly.

If it walks like a pro-Russian duck, talks like a pro-Russian duck, and quacks like a pro-Russian duck...
 
Last edited:
Maybe. SLF has been following geo politics, wars etc for decades, and has a wealth of knowledge about it, I can’t remember them all.
I was being facetious, jakey the guy who wrote the letter is a massive war monger, like Nuland where ever he goes death and destruction follows.
 
Yeah, nah.

I don't want to get too deep into this because he's gone now and we can just move on without him easily enough, but I absolutely and unequivocally reject your assertion that he wasn't pro-Russian.

He also wasn't just "providing the other POV". He unabashedly celebrated Russian wins, and lamented Russian losses. He rallied against the sanctions imposed on Russia and frequently reposted Russian propaganda about how strong the Russian economy was despite the "western sanctions". He defended Putin repeatedly, and then would occasionally throwout a "oh but he's a tyrant" as if that little statement would provide him cover for all the enthusiastic cheerleading that preceded it - the geopolitical equivalent of absolutely bullying someone but then adding a "no offense" at the end of your rant. He posted combat footage of Russian successes and then attempted to discredit any similar Ukranian footage as fake, propaganda, or akshually a sign of how Russia was winning. At the start of the conflict he literally posted that Russia would control Kyiv "very soon", and then repeatedly denied ever saying this, despite it being there for all to see.

If you and the 'clique' couldn't see what he was doing and why, then that's an issue for you folks to grapple with. Maybe you're being genuine when you say that you have never been pro-Russian, but that doesn't mean that MaddAdam/Simpkin/SLF/Warlord wasn't.



LOL no.

Not even going to unpack that, other than to laugh at it and say Russia was selling gas to Europe just fine before they invaded the sovereign territory of another nation which resulted in sanctions being imposed on them. If they'd just kept their dick in their proverbial pants, then them selling gas would have continued unabated and no one was complaining.



I argued the concept frequently, both here and on the 'mainboard' threads with other people who claim Russia was provoked and the invasion was justified and NATO and America are the great satan. But guess what; the only thread I ever received actual bullying and abuse was in the chessboard thread from your mob.
I was going to leave it but you’re wrong, you’ve literally made it up in your head and junk posted for months and months trying to convince everyone else.

Chad reality is this way..
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread VII

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top