I understand he will not be! (I might get the centre line I wanted from an earlier post!)What about Mitch...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I understand he will not be! (I might get the centre line I wanted from an earlier post!)What about Mitch...
and he wont have to do parent teacher interviews. As a teacher myself I'd take that deal every day of the week.You've got the financial stuff completely wrong. He was a high school teacher early in his career playing VFL on the side. Absolute max that would've been $100k combined (you can get better money in country footy or Ammos than VFL normally).
As a draftee at pick 36 he gets $110k base plus $4k per AFL game so would be on $118k already. I'm 99% sure there are also smaller VFL match payments for AFL listed players but I can't find details on that. There are also generous allowances on relocations and the club cover many more random expenses like meals than a high school would.
Worst case for him if he's delisted at the end of 2025 is he'll have been probably $70k better off over the 2 years. Not a massive windfall but better than a kick in the teeth and in no way is he worse off now than previously.
Yeah fair.Last 4 games for the cats TDK and Grundy arguably best on ground. Before that Nankervis had 51 hitouts , and before that Briggs 23 touches and 44 hitouts
The ruck role is not overrated when they come up against us. Any decent ruckman turns into a match winner it’s very concerning
Most teachers I know would work for free if they never had to deal with parents.and he wont have to do parent teacher interviews. As a teacher myself I'd take that deal every day of the week.
Yeah fair.
But in those games our ruck has been SDK against Carlton, Stanley against Sydney, and Conway against Richmond and GWS. So, based on that small sample, we've tried 3 different options and they've all been bad. It's not like we've got a world beater in the VFL, what are we supposed to do?
It might be that Neale is not a pack contested mark player? Much like the King boys I think he is a 200cm fast mark on the lead type?The big issue with Neale is his competitiveness.
He has all the physical traits but lacks self belief.
Perhaps was told not to compete against Hawkins.
Currently he is playing soft, like a gentle giant
He appears reluctant to use his physical strength.
Due to being penalised when he bodied opponents
Confused, as opponents allowed to push him around
Umpires are usually harsh on precocious rookies
This usually resolves over time with experience.
Cats must work to accelerate his learning curve.
Coaches to assist with mindset and mental game.
Hopefully the responsibility of being KPF will help
Also will benefit from physical nature of ruck work
Scott must instruct teammates to target KPF Neale
To encourage and acknowledge acts of aggression
Ultimately it will be up to himself to step up
Ironically, failure is the best teacher,
Football gives the test first and lesson after.
Trust, Neale will come good, sooner than later
Ok. So what I want to see at the bounce tomorrow…
Centre line.
Knevitt. Holmes. Dempsey
Followers.
SDK. Dangerfield. Stewart
Humphries starting on half back flank. Happy to have Blitz start in backline.
Sub. Duncan
Ok. So what I want to see at the bounce tomorrow…
Centre line.
Knevitt. Holmes. Dempsey
Followers.
SDK. Dangerfield. Stewart
Humphries starting on half back flank. Happy to have Blitz start in backline.
Sub. Duncan
Maybe, but it is mystifying for onlookers who are keen and emotional for his chance, given form.
For all the reasons you gave, the Club knows what it's doing-and it's investment. There's not much leeway position wise, and there is balance to consider. He was thrown in earlier to try and impress, played well but displayed errors. It's not unusual to blood players in the VFL, our way- if you look at our past players, albeit a bit younger than Shaun. Patience, grasshopper.
People were throwing around the idea Conway was injured a week or so ago and he simply wasn't.Conway named FF in the VFL for anyone saying “oh he wasn’t picked because he’s injured”
Yeah you're right. It all comes back to the confidence thing, which has seemed off ever since that facial injury last year. I'm not sure what the solution is and I guess the MC had reached that point too. However ruck you really need to be up for it, the physicality is constant. He did end up getting involved but it was hard not to be left with the impression of that awful start.Agreed, definitely not a ruckman.
I wasn't suggesting a fear of the role. I'm of the belief he has a fear of physicality atm, and it's holding him back. Rucking involves a lot of body on body, so it was never going to be something he'd relish, unlike his brother.
Maybe it sparked something in him. Hopefully it did. But I'd prefer to see him playing defense again rather than being monstered by Goldie and Draper.
But we have problems with Conway and Stanley, and Blitz is poor atm, so hands are tied somewhat I guess.
People were throwing around the idea Conway was injured a week or so ago and he simply wasn't.
So Stanley goes out and we rest a fit Conway in the last 2 weeks to play Blicavs / SDK in non preferred positions. I know we're trying to win games, but you'd think Conway would've learned alot last week against TDK and this week against Goldstein. And I'm not sure it would've meant we played any worse?
Weird.
Because you just said - "Before that Nankervis had 51 hitouts , and before that Briggs 23 touches and 44 hitouts"Play Conway and rest him for Stanley when he needs. Dont see why it’s such a difficult conundrum
I would work for free if I never had to deal with childrenMost teachers I know would work for free if they never had to deal with parents.
He's our leading goalkicker (17 in 7 games). Given the role he's playing, I'd say that's good formWhat form? Mannagh hasn't set the VFL alight. Knevitt, Humphries, Clohesy, Hardie, Conway are all well ahead of him on form. He played deep forward on the weekend and had almost no impact. Others, myself included, have said he's looked good when injected into the midfield, but clearly the club wants him in a different role. On current form he doesn't deserve a promotion.
He would not be competing against Hawkins though. More like Dek or any other tall defender.The big issue with Neale is his competitiveness.
He has all the physical traits but lacks self belief.
Perhaps was told not to compete against Hawkins.
Currently he is playing soft, like a gentle giant
He appears reluctant to use his physical strength.
Due to being penalised when he bodied opponents
Confused, as opponents allowed to push him around
Umpires are usually harsh on precocious rookies
This usually resolves over time with experience.
Cats must work to accelerate his learning curve.
Coaches to assist with mindset and mental game.
Hopefully the responsibility of being KPF will help
Also will benefit from physical nature of ruck work
Scott must instruct teammates to target KPF Neale
To encourage and acknowledge acts of aggression
Ultimately it will be up to himself to step up
Ironically, failure is the best teacher,
Football gives the test first and lesson after.
Trust, Neale will come good, sooner than later
Because you just said - "Before that Nankervis had 51 hitouts , and before that Briggs 23 touches and 44 hitouts"
Conway was our ruck in those games. So you're arguing that Conway made oppo rucks look like world beaters, but then say that it's a no brainer that Conway is our ruck?
Yes I’m saying it’s a no brainer to play our actual ruckman , especially Conway. As I said how is it a difficult conundrum? You have the choice to play your young gun ruckman a few games in a row then rest him for the veteran, or randomly throw darts at the selection table with SDK, Henry, blitz etc…
We are gonna get killed most weeks in the ruck so why not play and get experience in Conway?
Perhaps the club doesn't want to destroy Conway's confidence.
Yes I’m saying it’s a no brainer to play our actual ruckman , especially Conway. As I said how is it a difficult conundrum? You have the choice to play your young gun ruckman a few games in a row then rest him for the veteran, or randomly throw darts at the selection table with SDK, Henry, blitz etc…
We are gonna get killed most weeks in the ruck so why not play and get experience in Conway?
Perhaps the club doesn't want to destroy Conway's confidence.