Not concerned about what you have done elsewhere. You can't be constructive when you pick or choose.
That's pretty much how it is here, and it helps to stop the forum from turning into a facebook page. Is it really any skin off your nose to back up your assertion about today, spell out why Plowman was a liability out there, and enable others to either agree or debate your assertions? That's how discussion forums work, not just with closed off critical quips. They just seem troll-like and cause others to take the bait.
I did. You didn’t read it. You reacted to something you’ve interpreted because my view is liability and you have a different opinion. Not sure what else I can say sorry. you’re clearly on a troll witch hunt agenda so if I’m to be it do whatever you’re already keen to do. Pretty sure my history despite willing to have controversial views isn’t a trolling one but be my guest and justify your cause I suppose