Society/Culture Reproductive Rights: Roe vs Wade, abortion, etc

Remove this Banner Ad

Um hmm. I think I've made it quite clear what I think you started.
Was this the response you expected?

Personally, I think trolling is fine, as long as you actually have something to say as part of the deal. That's where the real entertainment lies.
It's like art, you know, where some people can paint like Monet, but others just pass a brush over a canvass few times and then expect it to be interpreted as though there is a hidden meaning in there somewhere, sit around on the dole and complain about how no one buys what they're trying to sell, and the government should do more to support their "art".

You're not really much of an artist, are you.
Do those people who can paint like Monet get paid for their impressions?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

One of the rights scaremongering is Muslim immigration and ending up with…..horror…….sharia law.

I ask fundamentally what’s the difference to where they want to go? Seems like it’s just being able to have ursury
 
Almost everyone takes a position of accepting abortion.

This argument is really all along the lines of control over women and the poor.

Very few people actually oppose abortion. They just make excuses to support taking away bodily autonomy from women.
Wrong again, you have absolutely no view out of your echo chamber, do you?
 
By that rationale pregnant women will have to buy two tickets for air travel or on other public transportation. If a pregnant woman chances it and goes to a gig she would have to pay double entry. Ditto for visiting a museum or indeed any other 'paid entry' venue like a sporting event.

They'd pay child prices for the foetus of course but still, it's an interesting precedent to be setting...
 
By that rationale pregnant women will have to buy two tickets for air travel or on other public transportation. If a pregnant woman chances it and goes to a gig she would have to pay double entry. Ditto for visiting a museum or indeed any other 'paid entry' venue like a sporting event.

They'd pay child prices for the foetus of course but still, it's an interesting precedent to be setting...

Well then effectively that mother is driving with a newborn in her lap secured only by her own seatbelt. That baby should be in a baby seat, now it gets complicated.
 
Well then effectively that mother is driving with a newborn in her lap secured only by her own seatbelt. That baby should be in a baby seat, now it gets complicated.

Texas has a simple solution to this; ban all women from driving just in-case they're pregnant.
 
By that rationale pregnant women will have to buy two tickets for air travel or on other public transportation. If a pregnant woman chances it and goes to a gig she would have to pay double entry. Ditto for visiting a museum or indeed any other 'paid entry' venue like a sporting event.

They'd pay child prices for the foetus of course but still, it's an interesting precedent to be setting...

Don't give America and their insane capitalism any ideas, they may really end up charging extra on pregnant women on everything
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

By that rationale pregnant women will have to buy two tickets for air travel or on other public transportation. If a pregnant woman chances it and goes to a gig she would have to pay double entry. Ditto for visiting a museum or indeed any other 'paid entry' venue like a sporting event.

They'd pay child prices for the foetus of course but still, it's an interesting precedent to be setting...
infants get free admission to those things and who is taking thier infant to a gig? :drunk:
 
10gjs0r6ata91.jpg
 
By that rationale pregnant women will have to buy two tickets for air travel or on other public transportation. If a pregnant woman chances it and goes to a gig she would have to pay double entry. Ditto for visiting a museum or indeed any other 'paid entry' venue like a sporting event.

They'd pay child prices for the foetus of course but still, it's an interesting precedent to be setting...
Except unders 2s already go free on those things. Price is determined by space taken up not number of brains. If there is one thing the usa is good at its rational capitalism.
 
Almost everyone takes a position of accepting abortion.

This argument is really all along the lines of control over women and the poor.

Very few people actually oppose abortion. They just make excuses to support taking away bodily autonomy from women.
This is utterly false and completely fails to get at the root of the problem.

the problem is religion. It has nothing to do with controlling women or white people or men. Religious women support the anti abortion stance too.

religion is the problem and its about time progressivess recognise the problem rather then just blaming the groups they want to blame cos its easy.

we need to shift society away from religion. All religion. But a lot of progressives dont want to do this cos they want to be tolerant to religion. Its an anti science view that is causing real damage.
 
By that rationale pregnant women will have to buy two tickets for air travel or on other public transportation. If a pregnant woman chances it and goes to a gig she would have to pay double entry. Ditto for visiting a museum or indeed any other 'paid entry' venue like a sporting event.

They'd pay child prices for the foetus of course but still, it's an interesting precedent to be setting...
A lot of places already do under 2 free. Eg I think planes where child is strapped to parent are free
 
the problem is religion. It has nothing to do with controlling women or white people or men. Religious women support the anti abortion stance too.

You're ignoring all of the evidence.
 


They're cooked. Shithole country.

(Actually thats not fair, there's a few shithole states though)


I think it is important to note at this point that the story regarding the 10 year old girl appears to be completely made up.

The Ohio Attorney General confirmed that no police department in the state has received a report regarding this, and also confirmed that in the circumstances under Ohio law an abortion would have been legal.
 
I think it is important to note at this point that the story regarding the 10 year old girl appears to be completely made up.

The Ohio Attorney General confirmed that no police department in the state has received a report regarding this, and also confirmed that in the circumstances under Ohio law an abortion would have been legal.
10-year-old rape victim forced to travel from Ohio to Indiana for abortion

The case of a 10-year-old child rape victim in Ohio who was six weeks pregnant, ineligible for an abortion in her own state, and forced to travel to Indiana for the procedure has spotlighted the shocking impact of the US supreme court ruling on abortion.​
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Reproductive Rights: Roe vs Wade, abortion, etc

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top