jmac70
On the porch
Does that change the message behind his statement?Bucks has been forced by circumstance to make a public statement acknowledging historically based problems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Does that change the message behind his statement?Bucks has been forced by circumstance to make a public statement acknowledging historically based problems.
It makes me question the sincerity of his comment in relation to the current situation.Does that change the message behind his statement?
Show me your proof. Why do you feel like you have to slander him when you have no proof?The racist incident upon which most of Leon's case is based occurred not 10 but 20 years ago - the completion of the profile and the ostracism which he never reported. He does not specifically mention another incident from his 11 years at the club. He states that he never heard the name Chimp used.
For me, this comes across as a bit of a fluff article, for which Davis has obviously been paid, strong on sentiment but thin on detail. I have no disagreement in the value of listening to the 'truths' as indigenous people see them. But to pretend that he is in any way describing the club's current attitude towards POC is doing the club a disservice. I would like to hear now from some of the other POCs who played at the club - particularly Brad Dick.
I don't like ex players taking aim at the club from the comfort of a 2 page newspaper article, but now that the discussion is taking place via the media, as evidenced by Buckley being coerced by the publicity into a public apology, why not now conduct the whole issue via the media. If any ex players have a comment, let them make it through the newspapers or TV, with the added value of making a little extra money on the side.
Quite obviously the club's culture has changed, but we are never going to be able to understand this while the commentary and analysis is historically based.
Well, I believe him.It makes me question the sincerity of his comment in relation to the current situation.
I am slandering no one. I am suggesting that for an article of that length he would receive remuneration.Show me your proof. Why do you feel like you have to slander him when you have no proof?
show me your proof. You are absolutely slandering him because that is the point of your post. Otherwise i dont know why you posted it.I am slandering no one. I am suggesting that for an article of that length he would receive remuneration.
I am not suggesting that payment has influenced his views. I am not happy with this debate taking place via the media instead of directly with the club. If people are genuinely interested in being part of the process of change in the club, they would be offering their services and thoughts directly to the club. We know for instance that the ultimate aim of Lumumba's campaign is a financial settlement, particularly as he repeatedly refused direct discussion with the club and committee and has taken it straight to court.show me your proof. You are absolutely slandering him because that is the point of your post. Otherwise i dont know why you posted it.
You have zero knowledge of HL's motivations, you are making those up as well. IF you can assume that, i can assume your motivations for posting are either you are just trying to discredit HL and LD and the report because you don't agree that the club is systemically racist or you actually are racist.I am not suggesting that payment has influenced his views. I am not happy with this debate taking place via the media instead of directly with the club. If people are genuinely interested in being part of the process of change in the club, they would be offering their services and thoughts directly to the club. We know for instance that the ultimate aim of Lumumba's campaign is a financial settlement, particularly as he repeatedly refused direct discussion with the club and committee and has taken it straight to court.
That isn't quite how it works, and is a massive oversimplificationYou dont get a 10yr career from a racist club - doesnt make any sense Lumumba.
That isn't quite how it works, and is a massive oversimplification
Did you read the Leon Davis article?You dont get a 10yr career from a racist club - doesnt make any sense Lumumba.
Leon had a problem in his first year (2000), but beyond that he doesn't detail anything specific spanning the final 10 years of his playing career.Did you read the Leon Davis article?
Did you read the Leon Davis article?
I am not suggesting that payment has influenced his views. I am not happy with this debate taking place via the media instead of directly with the club. If people are genuinely interested in being part of the process of change in the club, they would be offering their services and thoughts directly to the club. We know for instance that the ultimate aim of Lumumba's campaign is a financial settlement, particularly as he repeatedly refused direct discussion with the club and committee and has taken it straight to court.
Bucks has been forced by circumstance to make a public statement acknowledging historically based problems.
I'd consider them circumstances forcing a placatory statement regarding Lumumba which I am sure Buckley would prefer not to have to make. Waleed Aly has not apologised for his interview with the man and nor should Buckley apologise for anything. Unfortunately the club has been pressured in the media by the almost fluff media article by Davis who did not even serve under Buckley with Lumumba as a player. The club have to play the media game and the odds are weighted against them in this over-charged PC environment.I'd consider them comments from improved understanding.
I'd consider them circumstances forcing a placatory statement regarding Lumumba which I am sure Buckley would prefer not to have to make. Waleed Aly has not apologised for his interview with the man and nor should Buckley apologise for anything. Unfortunately the club has been pressured in the media by the almost fluff media article by Davis who did not even serve under Buckley with Lumumba as a player. The club have to play the media game and the odds are weighted against them in this over-charged PC environment.
I suppose I am viewing the comments from my point of view. You may well be right. I would not think an apology wise when you are being taken to court on a civil action, but perhaps Buckley and the club know what they are doing.I think Bucks comments were sincere and you're viewing them cynically.
Yeah I agree. I think Bucks is a touch on the spectrum when it comes to social stuff. But he learns lessons.I think Bucks comments were sincere and you're viewing them cynically.
You're missing my point, i was referring to the author's article, nothing you said, you're not that important.no . and you are missing my point...
We are all on the spectrumYeah I agree. I think Bucks is a touch on the spectrum when it comes to social stuff. But he learns lessons.
We are all on the spectrum