Can't like your post enough TGG. You not only took the words out of my mouth, you eloquently expressed what I was thinking in a better way than I could have hoped to. Thank you for taking the time to make such a thoughtful, considered post.You have touched on the reason I have not condemned the club in the wake of this report,
Other than Lumumba, I can think of no other likely candidates among players in recent times that would have required the club to initiate proceedings to deal with racist issues. I refuse to include Lumumba's particularly concerns until more is known about his personal situation, especially the controversy surrounding his nickname and whether he in fact asked players to call him chimp as has been claimed. I don't think Collingwood has any choice now than to see his court case through to the end. A payout prior to the hearing would be an admission of guilt as well as acknowledgement that systemic racism and inadequate mechanisms to deal with it still exist at the club. Lumumba is being hailed as a hero with the courage to force Collingwood into having this review. To acknowledge the veracity of his accusations (whatever they are beyond the chimp nickname) by settling out of court would be a PR disaster.
Otherwise, so much of the grounds for the report's findings appear historically based - the Winmar, Long, Mc Adam incidents occurred 30 years ago. The Goodes' incident involved a 13 year old Collingwood supporter and our president's King Kong blunder and cannot be attributed to faulty club practice or systems. I am not particularly interested in what occurred at the club prior to McGuire taking over 20 years ago. What occurred then has long been in the public domain, and the insensitive remarks of president McAllister in relation to the Winmar and McAdam incidents are well known. I want to know that the club learned from these experiences and set up internal mechanisms to deal with issues related to race and inclusion.
I see the outcome of the Lumumba case as crucial to the club's credibility now. If it is shown that the club failed to adequately support the man or take seriously his concerns, then we have a very recent serious example of systemic failure. If on the other hand, Lumumba largely brought the nickname on himself and is unable to successfully produce further examples of racist behaviour directed against him, I can't see from where further issues of systemic racism and failure to deal with it may have arisen. We have not had any indigenous players on the list in recent years and there are no known issues involving other coloured players who have recently been at the club.
However, I do think that Eddie has now reached his use by date. A fresh face at the top would take a lot of media heat off the club. The man looked flustered and out of his depth at times last night. We need a leader capable of appearing more in control of himself, who knows how to handle complex situations and inspire confidence that right culture is being adhered to within the club.