Originally posted by phatandphreaky
Yes, please compare the stats over the past 5 years of Lance and ANYONE you've mentioned.
What is showing Lance's stats from 3 years ago going to prove, if I show Lance's stats from the last 5 years it will back up my statement that his best football is behind him, cos hos stats are going downhill. Just because he had a good year in 1999/2000 doesnt mean anything, that was 4 years ago. So your saying Geelong should ignore this year take a look at season 2000 and say "gee he had a good year 3 years ago, lets get him here" thats just stupid. The stats we should be looking at and are looking at are last season stats which show he had a **** year. Recruiting on form from 2-3 years ago is bloody stupid. You recruit on present form, and at present he is playing crap.
AND YES Lance is injury prone, he has had at least 3 injuries over the past 2 seasons, osteitis pubis, a hamstring tear and just this season a shoulder, and is that what we want an injured player? He wont get any fresher as the years go on, 3 injuries in 2 seasons, plus the fat camp, doesnt show much for his health in upcoming seasons.
Just because he has played more games than Steven King doesnt mean anything. Dont forget when King came to Geelong we already had a #1 ruckman, so King spent his first few years playing in the Reserves. So the fact that Whitnall has played moer games than King doesnt say much.