BoundbyKreuze
Cancelled
- Feb 9, 2020
- 1,463
- 2,997
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Captains run. Not everyone does.Jack Martin didn’t part take in training this morning? Management or going to miss?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Captains run. Not everyone does.Jack Martin didn’t part take in training this morning? Management or going to miss?
Ridiculous change. It really is a clueless organisation - 4 on the bench for ffs.
WHAT A JOKE IMAGINE MAKING YOUR DEBUT & NO EVEN STEPPING FOOT ON THE GROUND ~~~ AFL STILL GOT NO IDEARidiculous all round ...
- Medical sub named 60 min prior to bounce, out of emergencies.
- Medical sub gets medal if not activated GF day
- Player gets game to his record even if he sits on the bench all day as an unactivated sub.
*Mark Stevens on Twitter
Medical Sub, yes....sadly....So it would probably only be a new injury to a best 22 player that would result in this debut then, right?
that sub spot is going to be jack silvagni's new purgatory
No great surprise, every major sports league worldwide is worried about CTE and if I'm the AFL's insurers I'd be making sure they're doing everything they can to minimise future risk.
****ing clueless decision.WHAT A JOKE IMAGINE MAKING YOUR DEBUT & NO EVEN STEPPING FOOT ON THE GROUND ~~~ AFL STILL GOT NO IDEA
What's a captain's run session? How is it different to a normal training session?
No great surprise, every major sports league worldwide is worried about CTE and if I'm the AFL's insurers I'd be making sure they're doing everything they can to minimise future risk.
I dont think its a bad rule. I disagree with it being counted as a debut or in games tallys or medals etc, but its a minor gripe with a rule that on the most part I support.I bet supporters won't be that disgruntled if we lose a player early
I dont think its a bad rule. I disagree with it being counted as a debut or in games tallys or medals etc, but its a minor gripe with a rule that on the most part I support.
It's Matt Kennedy's role all year to me. He can play on ball to fill in for a mid or as a 3rd tall.I don't mind it either. Its injury and a tactical rule change
I would allocate the sub as a player that has pace rather than endurance
It's Matt Kennedy's role all year to me. He can play on ball to fill in for a mid or as a 3rd tall.
- If we lose a KPD, Casboult takes the defence spot and Kenendy goes forward
- If we lose a KPF, Kennedy goes forward
- Lose an onballer, Kennedy goes on ball
- Lose a HFF or HBF, then move some deckchairs around (e.g Zac Williams to that spot and Kennedy in the middle)
One of Matt's biggest issues is pace, but that's less of an issue if he comes on fresh
It's Matt Kennedy's role all year to me. He can play on ball to fill in for a mid or as a 3rd tall.
- If we lose a KPD, Casboult takes the defence spot and Kenendy goes forward
- If we lose a KPF, Kennedy goes forward
- Lose an onballer, Kennedy goes on ball
- Lose a HFF or HBF, then move some deckchairs around (e.g Zac Williams to that spot and Kennedy in the middle)
One of Matt's biggest issues is pace, but that's less of an issue if he comes on fresh
This makes zero difference to concussion.