I would have had Vaustin or maynard instead of sheppard.
Most years there seems to be a dud picked in the backline.
I don't think there's ever been a worst All Australian than James Frawley!
Sheppard is no dud.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would have had Vaustin or maynard instead of sheppard.
Most years there seems to be a dud picked in the backline.
I don't think there's ever been a worst All Australian than James Frawley!
What got Collingwood over the line was Carlton simply turning off like they regularly have throughout almost every match this season.
Moore got the nod because he simply won more of the ball. Bias aside, Weitering got snubbed big time. Played every game, more one-on-one contests and ALMOST did not lose a single one. He is clearly a more traditional defender and plays by the book. I'd rather be watching that then somebody always running off their man and winning the uncontested ball.
And just so you know, I am not anti-Collingwood. I too believe Maynard got snubbed. More deserving than Moore.
Maynard and Fyfe not the same comparison because he, Danger and Martin do play forward quite a bit but not as defenders. Wouldn't mind betting that if they spent much more time forward than in the midfield they would kick more goals than Papley, Butler etc. But I get what people are saying that we should stick to the positions people play. Everyone knows thought that midfielder dominate every award and accolade.
Moore does run off his man, but sometimes he leaves him while impacting another contest to help out his other defenders. His teammates have made this point. The commentators have drawn attention to it. Jake Niall observed this when commenting on the team he selected. These days defences can be a blend of pure negators and those who attack. Moore did pretty well in the one on ones too but provided a lot of dynamic drive to our team too. Luke Ball said that even has a teenager in the reserves he couldn't believe how he was helping his teammates.AA selectors traditionally don't like stoppers (except Darren Glass). And Weitering is more stopper than the other candidates. That's not to say he hasn't fashioned into a valuable and dependable player.
AA selectors traditionally don't like stoppers (except Darren Glass). And Weitering is more stopper than the other candidates. That's not to say he hasn't fashioned into a valuable and dependable player.
I would have had Vaustin or maynard instead of sheppard.
Most years there seems to be a dud picked in the backline.
I don't think there's ever been a worst All Australian than James Frawley!
Many people love the way Moore plays. He is entertaining to watch and such a super athlete. He mainly plays CHB so gets a bit of a licence to run but he can lock down on the big boys too. He is 203 cm, and is taller and faster than most opponents.What got Collingwood over the line was Carlton simply turning off like they regularly have throughout almost every match this season.
Moore got the nod because he simply won more of the ball. Bias aside, Weitering got snubbed big time. Played every game, more one-on-one contests and ALMOST did not lose a single one. He is clearly a more traditional defender and plays by the book. I'd rather be watching that then somebody always running off their man and winning the uncontested ball.
And just so you know, I am not anti-Collingwood. I too believe Maynard got snubbed. More deserving than Moore.
Many people love the way Moore plays. He is entertaining to watch and such a super athlete. He mainly plays CHB so gets a bit of a licence to run but he can lock down on the big boys too. He is 203 cm, and is taller and faster than most opponents.
There is no reason why they could not have had Weitering and Moore. Both could play in either key defensive role. Andrews was always going to be selected but missing basically 4 games and getting soundly beaten a couple of times could have ruled against him. They could have had Moore as a bench player because he can also go forward and play in the ruck.Look. I ain't saying Moore wasn't a good player this year. But a lot of the selection process is indeed nowadays more about possession numbers and who seems more marketable from both a player and team perspective. This is where Moore excels.
Bias and the team I support aside, If I were to have soaked in every game and every performance whilst acknowledging the field positions as they traditionally are, it is hard to not have Weitering cemented a position on the field after having played every single game and nearly not lose a single match-up. At best, they could both be in the side. They decide to go with two ruckmen. Why not two CHBs?
The AA selection panel is indeed heavily flawed and does include a fair few bias-fueled media personalities forging the resumes of players to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. I mean you have Luke Darcy on that panel and he is an absolute troll towards the Carlton football Club (just doesn't make it as visible as Kane Cornes). He has a history of forever disregarding our players whenever comparing them to others in the league.
It is why I have lost all respect for some of the awards like the rising star. To narrow it down to just 10-11 people whose view of the game wouldn't be that much better to a regular spectator (irrespective of whether or not they have a celebrated history in the sport), is more likely than not going to see more questionable and more baffling decisions.
Fair enough, but isn't Weitering marketable?Look. I ain't saying Moore wasn't a good player this year. But a lot of the selection process is indeed nowadays more about possession numbers and who seems more marketable from both a player and team perspective. This is where Moore excels.
Bias and the team I support aside, If I were to have soaked in every game and every performance whilst acknowledging the field positions as they traditionally are, it is hard to not have Weitering cemented a position on the field after having played every single game and nearly not lose a single match-up. At best, they could both be in the side. They decide to go with two ruckmen. Why not two CHBs?
The AA selection panel is indeed heavily flawed and does include a fair few bias-fueled media personalities forging the resumes of players to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. I mean you have Luke Darcy on that panel and he is an absolute troll towards the Carlton football Club (just doesn't make it as visible as Kane Cornes). He has a history of forever disregarding our players whenever comparing them to others in the league.
It is why I have lost all respect for some of the awards like the rising star. To narrow it down to just 10-11 people whose view of the game wouldn't be that much better compared to a regular spectator (irrespective of whether or not they have a celebrated history in the sport), is more likely than not going to see more questionable and more baffling decisions.
Fair enough, but isn't Weitering marketable?
lol noJonas better than Vlastuin for a start
0.72And goal assists?
That would look slightly better on first glance but wouldn't change that fact they only named 3 forwards in the entire team.What if you swap Bont and Petracca around?
Imagine a forward line without no small forwards... instead replaced by midfielders...
A disgrace.
Papley and Butler should feel robbed.
Imagine a forward line without no small forwards... instead replaced by midfielders...
A disgrace.
Papley and Butler should feel robbed.
It's interesting how opinions can range. For me, Brad Sheppard was amongst the seven absolute locks, alongside Petracca, Neale, Bontempelli, Hawkins, Naitanui and Boak. I think Sheppard gets overlooked because of who he plays alongside, but he's an absolute gun and has been for years.I would have had Vaustin or maynard instead of sheppard.
Most years there seems to be a dud picked in the backline.
I don't think there's ever been a worst All Australian than James Frawley!
Isn't the side about giving credit to the players who did well for the year and not necessarily a team they're likely to send out and play a game.I see the point people are making about orthodox forwards but I bet a lot of defenders would prefer to line up one on one against some of those people are miffed about missing out than the likes of Dusty Martin.
Equal 1st. And 19 goal assists in 17 games is not 0.72 but 1.10.72
LOLNor did they all have a consistently good year, nevermind a great AA worthy year.
Geez it's like they couldn't be arsed actually thinking and went "should be" over should be.
Wingers aren't wingers and 50% of fwds aren't fwds.
Happy for Shep, NicNat and Ryan though. Deserving and actually picked in their playing position.
Yes but you are doing it all wrong.
We are buying players on the cheap and they become All-Australians, you are buying players on big salaries and they play in the reserves.