The longer the season goes on then sure but what if he regain even some form......Even though he’ll be picked every week from here, I can’t see him getting a contract for 2024.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The longer the season goes on then sure but what if he regain even some form......Even though he’ll be picked every week from here, I can’t see him getting a contract for 2024.
I just don’t understand why he hasn’t been shifted to the HFF with Peds and Rash sharing his midfield minutes.
Such an obvious move.
That the player and club both allow these scenarios to play out is shameful at best.I'm not sure who's worse, Thommo in his last year or Sloane right now.
It happens at all clubs, players that go on a year too long. It’s also not on the player to make this call, why would you give up 100s of thousands for dollars if you didn’t have to? Riewoldt and Cotchin have been quite poor most of the season at Richmond, with the occasional decent performance, but they continue to get games even though finals are unlikely. Everyone wanted Tex to retire in 2020, but he then recovered to have his best ever 3 seasons after it, so maybe the club thought that could be the case for Sloaney as well? Who knows, but at this point it’s clear Sloaney is done at this level and isn’t getting back to 2017 form again.That the player and club both allow these scenarios to play out is shameful at best.
That the player and club both allow these scenarios to play out is shameful at best.
At least Thommo played all bar one game in the SANFLI'm not sure who's worse, Thommo in his last year or Sloane right now.
That one game cost us Jarryd Lyons.At least Thommo played all bar one game in the SANFL
thommo in his last year played in the SANFL except for 1 game. this is far worseI'm not sure who's worse, Thommo in his last year or Sloane right now.
This is clearly not right evidenced by the fact he has barely played in the middle for most of this year. As the kids have tired, he’s been getting more time.if we were going to make decisions (ps It's not a hard one), then we wouldn't have continued playing him as 1 of our 4 mids. The coaches value what he's doing in there. Let that sink in.
This is clearly not right evidenced by the fact he has barely played in the middle for most of this year. As the kids have tired, he’s been getting more time.
Barely played in the middle? Which games have you been watching? He started on the wing, but basically after the Richmond loss he’s played more middle than anything else. Froggy posted CBA attendances and clearances todayThis is clearly not right evidenced by the fact he has barely played in the middle for most of this year. As the kids have tired, he’s been getting more time.
thommo in his last year played in the SANFL except for 1 game. this is far worse
i think i understand the point you are trying to make but having family around and supporting a players extended family is crucial (see Racheles and Solis comments when extending contracts out for years). Having Collingwoods Mums join the team circle on Mothers Day - does that make them soulless? Horks, the family club, over their 4 premierships - soulless?a few weeks ago there was a photo on the AFC FB page of Sloane and Tex in the rooms after a game with their kids. The post title was 'this is what it's all about'. That's our club, they believe that rubbish. It's great they're happy in life, many aren't. But I couldn't give a fig whether they have kids and as a football supporter, them having kids is totally irrelevant. What it's all about is team success, club employees making the right decisions to give the playing group the best possible chance of experiencing the ultimate success. Our club is a soulless corporation and until they start measuring themselves solely against footy success, we'll never be anything different.
i think i understand the point you are trying to make but having family around and supporting a players extended family is crucial (see Racheles and Solis comments when extending contracts out for years). Having Collingwoods Mums join the team circle on Mothers Day - does that make them soulless? Horks, the family club, over their 4 premierships - soulless?
Its just a weird take
Look the club has real issues that need addressing - all the obvious ones like continuing elite talent acquisition (esp elite mids, Tex replacement), financial (dwindling crowds, new home base probable cost blow outs and borrowing money with structurally higher I/R now 4% higher than when they first started the modelling for a replacement home 3-10 years ago), performance away from home. Just calling a club soulless for involving family members is not really a big issues IMO but anyway probably doesnt need any more debating from my perspective if we philosophically differ on this issueis that what "it's all about" though? Plenty, hundreds even, of captions to that image that paints the picture you want it to. It speaks to our disconnection between club employees and the reason we actually exist.