Bender_
X
I thought I had already answered that!
But keep what confidential? What could possibly be perfectly above board that it's needed - give me a serious answer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I thought I had already answered that!
Okay, let's try again.
And I'll open it up to any Fremantle poster.
Explain to me under what circumstances a non-disclosure agreement has been made if there is nothing untoward happening. Please.
Hard to believe you're a WC supporter. Must be hard to soar with the Eagles when you're a total goose.
The names of all parties concerned. Are you sure the alleged victim wants her name to be discussed??But keep what confidential? What could possibly be perfectly above board that it's needed - give me a serious answer.
The names of all parties concerned. Are you sure the alleged victim wants her name to be discussed??
NDA's protect all parties. "I have to take their advice, I have to trust the process, and when you have the federal sex discrimination commissioner Kate Jenkins overseeing it and saying that for women to feel safe and to come forward, which is the most critical part, they need confidentiality, then I have to trust that process," he said. (Gil)
You know the NDA related to a Workers comp claim dont you?.....
Huh?...What do you mean?.....Where did I suggest that?!!Are you suggesting that she just wants to keep her name confidential simply because she worked for the Dockers?
But you would rather that she didnt....We need transparency!!Yes, she wants to keep her name confidential to avoid embarrassment for what she's been subjected to
Jesus, Bender, I'd like to think you're that stupid, but unfortunately there is sufficient evidence on these boards to suggest that you aren't. Get with the times, man. NDAs are as common as workplace agreements.I'm gonna go against my better judgement and indulge you here.
Give me your best answer as to why a non-disclosure agreement has been created if nothing untoward has occurred. Please, I'm really keen to hear your answer.
But you would rather that she didnt....We need transparency!!
Jesus, Bender, I'd like to think you're that stupid, but unfortunately there is sufficient evidence on these boards to suggest that you aren't. Get with the times, man. NDAs are as common as workplace agreements.
Huh?...What do you mean?.....Where did I suggest that?!!
An NDA wasn't necessarily required, but it is standard practice.Indeed they are Reg. I just don't understand the naivety of some of the Freo supporters to suggest everything is fine when an NDA is required in these circumstances.
I'm gonna go against my better judgement and indulge you here.
Give me your best answer as to why a non-disclosure agreement has been created if nothing untoward has occurred. Please, I'm really keen to hear your answer.
An NDA wasn't necessarily required, but it is standard practice.
Everything is fine, because whatever the incident was has been dealt with and put to rest. It's only being re-hashed now because of a media-driven campaign.
I hate getting into arguments on the internet, but I'll just throw my 5 cents in anyway. Btw I don't like Lyon nor want him at my club and I kind of hope this forces him to stand down.
My guess, whatever happened is not clear cut enough to go straight to court, possibly not a comfortable fit under the rug either. So they've gone the middle ground, cash settlement, non-disclosure agreement.
This kind of thing does happen a fair bit. Time in court is expensive and not always a sure thing.
Okay, let's try again.
And I'll open it up to any Fremantle poster.
Explain to me under what circumstances a non-disclosure agreement has been made if there is nothing untoward happening. Please.
We're discussing it, that's all. I don't think I've even articulated a punishment or anything similar for Lyon in any of my posts. I take issue at the defence of Freo supporters being basically "Your club has done worse!". It's immature. Wrong is wrong, it's not a matter of basis of comparison or proportionate to others behaviour.
I agree, and think as per usual you’ve been pretty fair. Not sure why some here are melting at you, I’ve always enjoyed your posts. The “you can’t talk cause West Coast” defence is silly. Similarly though there is West Coast supporters here that are clearly loving this too much which is also a bit sad.
As I’ve been saying all along unless additional details are released we are all going to be discussing speculation and rumours.
Folks do however simply have to accept that financial settlements and Non Disclosure Agreements are a part of the landscape when it comes to settling workplace disputes and complaints, irrespective of the guilt or innocence of either party. They are just the cleanest, and therefore cheapest way to say goodbye in many circumstances.
It's human nature to expect the worst, especially when it's from the point of view of a rival. But we'll never really know the truth until a colleague talks out of school which will eventually happen.
Claims of sexual assault seem ridiculously far fetched though.
No, best player in the AFL.
About 6 pages to late with the "joke" there mate
Rumours around Ross won’t see the week out. Watch this space.
Rumours from where? If Ross goes then Bond, Rosich and Board would also need to go as they signed off on everything or are they just going to throw him under the bus and hope we all forgive them.Rumours around Ross won’t see the week out. Watch this space.