Have a quick look at our own history . . between the years 1917 to 1939.
While I agree with most of this post, anything before 1925 lessens the impact because there was not a full 12 team comp.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Have a quick look at our own history . . between the years 1917 to 1939.
i see what you did thereI’d rather not rest Cox as you suggest.
There’s no point having a Cox if he just stoods still.
Better Cox is fresh, ready and energetic so early in the season.
Let him just get into it.
Last thing for mason is to be in and out
Of the side.
With Cox, being so big in this case, size does matter.
Injured, I think. They may give him a run in the VFL.
Reid and Cox both shouldn't play if wet. I'd like to see Buckley have the balls to sit one out if the weather is terrible.
But the mcg has to be seriously soaked to have a major effect on the game so unless it's bucketing down I'd keep them in.
Injured, I think. They may give him a run in the VFL.
Carringbush just how far do we take that?While I agree with most of this post, anything before 1925 lessens the impact because there was not a full 12 team comp.
Only needs to bob up a couple of times for a massive impactSurely Hawks dont play Rioli, the guy started pre season two months late, and hasnt played any pre season games. I dont mind if he does, as l can see him spent by halftime.
Only needs to bob up a couple of times for a massive impact
Only needs to bob up a couple of times for a massive impact
I really liked what Crocker did late vs Dogs
he USED to be a noted tackler. Doesnt have the pace or agility to be a dominant trackler anymore... which has also hampered his ability to win possessions & impose himself on the game in any other discipline.
Lol Rioli apprently has been flying for 6 weeks and isn't on "1 leg"A goal is worth six points regardless. If he’s on one leg or might not see out the game then that’s a risk hawthorn have to consider.
I reckon he’ll be picked but not convinced he’lll play
Carringbush just how far do we take that?
How about Melbourne's run in the '50's - that was with only 12 teams.
Carlton's run in the '70's and '80's - only 12 teams.
Hawthorn's amazing run after they got gifted Waverly - only 12 teams.
Why not discount Geelong's massive run recently because they are the only team to have their own private home ground which is surely a huge advantage?
We all know that every expansion club has had monstrous resources poured into them by the AFL and rule changes to ensure they were successful. So how about we discount all of those efforts??
Just where do we draw the line???
I'm stuffed if I know.
I trust the word of my Collingwood brothers and sisters.
Except WalterBlaknWhte and CFC2010
Don't believe a word they say.
It's hard to get context over the net but I get where you're coming from.No you've read me wrong, it wasn't until 1925 that there was a full 12 team comp - before then it was varying between 4 and 10 so anything up until 1925 didn't have as much "impact" as it did after.
Probably would've been a better sample from 1925 to 1939 - in which we completely dominated I agree.
I can only go by what you guys say.
Actually we live in the information age so I could just google it but I trust the word of my Collingwood brothers and sisters.
Except WalterBlaknWhte and CFC2010
Don't believe a word they say.
Too often younger supporters get into this 'cringe' mode about our club and it irritates the hell out of me. Those that do don't seem to understand that all this negative media stuff is carefully crafted to bring about internal dissent if at all possible.
The point I was trying to get across to Spesh Ed and others is that the impact of Jock was competition wide.
https://www.eviscerati.org/comics/comic/hd/2012/02/Change-Changes-Sake