Round 10 discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

The back line had produced so much carnage this season

Hartlett
Birchall
Gibbs
Hanley
Shaw
Plus many more are all prone to horrible scores. Heppell and Goddard seem to be the only premiums (who were priced as premiums at the start of the season) that score consistenly enough

No one is safe, be afraid
 
Even if you had the balls, why would you want to? Your starting players are clearly better.
Through DPP I could have put Staker on the bench and Terlich on the field. But it wasn't worth the risk IMO
 
The back line had produced so much carnage this season

Hartlett
Birchall
Gibbs
Hanley
Shaw
Plus many more are all prone to horrible scores. Heppell and Goddard seem to be the only premiums (who were priced as premiums at the start of the season) that score consistenly enough

No one is safe, be afraid
I would not include Hanley as part of that group. 1 bad score does not constitute carnage. You forgot Waters too! You're right though only Goddard and Heppell stand out as the 'true back line premiums'. Hibberd and Ibbotson both deserve very honourable mentions though...and if Gibbs stays fit I'd expect him to be among the best too
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I would not include Hanley as part of that group. 1 bad score does not constitute carnage. You forgot Waters too! You're right though only Goddard and Heppell stand out as the 'true back line premiums'. Hibberd and Ibbotson both deserve very honourable mentions though...and if Gibbs stays fit I'd expect him to be among the best too

Duffield as well? Average into the 90's, last 4 scores have been very good
 
I would not include Hanley as part of that group. 1 bad score does not constitute carnage for backmen. You forgot Waters too! You're right though only Goddard and Heppell stand out as the 'true back line premiums'. Hibberd and Ibbotson both deserve very honourable mentions though...and if Gibbs stays fit I'd expect him to be among the best too
If Hanley is able to score a 36, he can't be trusted. No player who is considered a premium can get a score lower than 50
 
235/2 Caff and Swannie. Caff looking like a real decent tagger, smashed JPK and now Hanley. Tackles so much now he is tagging.
 
If Hanley is able to score a 36, he can't be trusted. No player who is considered a premium can get a score lower than 50

If I had Hanley I'd be quite nervous that he will be tagged more often now. He was Brisbane's best player over the first 9 rounds so it is about bloody time he copped some attention, you'd think other coaches would have thought to tag him earlier :rolleyes:

I just remembered that Hanley was suspended for a week earlier in the year though so I suppose that combined with his 36 could constitute carnage but currently he still has to be considered as a top 6 back!
 
Swan, Stake. Meh.

Will be happy if I can somehow scrape passed 2000 in this round, such is the team I have fielded. Praying for no late outs as I have no bench cover. My team will look much better once I trade in a forward premium next round, unsure of who that will be however.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

296/4

Hanley
Shaw
Pendles
McAffer

Finished 60 points behind my projected score for that game. Thank god for McAffer, except everyone has him so its basically a meaningless score. Trust my uniques to deliver pathetic scores...
 
I've had a great start.... Was on a plane back from Perth last night at 6pm, just about to switch the phone off and get a text message.

Why have you left the "E" on Rockliff, not Macaffer.... Oh and by the way, Clokes out....

Doomed........ :mad::eek::confused::(
 
I would have loved to trade him to Ball or Jack this week but I had four injuries in the forward line.
Ouch! We all got hit with the injuries/selections this week. I have f**k all bench cover but was still able to get Ball and Staker in without getting any doughnuts
 

The pain of fiddling too much with your side when you don't actually have the time to check it before lockout....

I could of sworn that I'd checked all emergencies in the morning, then all I did was quickly check for no late outs on the Sunday games...

But it appears I was wrong... :(
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Round 10 discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top