- Oct 24, 2012
- 6,924
- 14,774
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Northern Districts Tigers
Must be closer to getting a start than I thought. Already backup ruck.Would not be surprised if Knoll actually plays
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Must be closer to getting a start than I thought. Already backup ruck.Would not be surprised if Knoll actually plays
He’s been in several teams...he’ll be ok.Good one Was inferring the experience to be with the team...………..but you knew that
So who would go out? Sinclair/Fox?
The fact that he’s not playing NEAFL must be a good indicator?Must be closer to getting a start than I thought. Already backup ruck.
*disclaimer, am a one-eyed Swans supporter.which clubs youth would you rather have- players under 25 (non rookie)
So we just put all the burden on the 1st gamer...yeah that makes senseStraight swap Sinclair for mine. He needs a break
Because he usually hits a target. I'm sure same can be said about Lloyd if we're talking about the opposition.
Bur seriously they are similar players McVeigh has a nice baulk that opens his options but Lloyd runs harder.
So we just put all the burden on the 1st gamer...yeah that makes sense
Why does this board give McVeigh a pass for nothing but 25m sideways kicks, yet crucify Lloyd for doing the exact same thing? Why is it “steadying leadership” when McVeigh does it, but “sideways defensive ****” when Lloyd does it?
BS IMO
No they expanded the emergency list to 4 and a ruck has to be named.Did they name him as an emergency just to shut up the garbage talk from the haters about us taking him off Essendon?
Travelling emergency so, if Sinclair trips over in the Qantas lounge, he debuts. Thought he'd be lucky to get a sniff this year. They must rate him.The fact that he’s not playing NEAFL must be a good indicator?
I usually back us but will be happy if we can make it a good scrap in a 3 or 4 goal loss this year. Hope I am wrong though.How many times have you thought we’d beat Geelong at Geelong? We’ve done that before.
So somehow McVeigh waltzes in with no gameplay...how lovely. If COR is dropped after last week I'll flip right out!
Always a welcome surprise.I usually back us but will be happy if we can make it a good scrap in a 3 or 4 goal loss this year. Hope I am wrong though.
I could beat McVeigh in a foot race but he's still the best decision maker in the team.
Plus we're not exactly overburdened with experience, especially up back, and there's no runner to help out. So a 300+ game premiership player who can find a target, release team-mates into space and then coach them on where to run is a good get.
Being a newby to the Swans and obviously footy we’ll forgive your total lack of knowledge as to what Macca brings to the Team
Fox had to stay in the team so he could take another hanger against the Cats. Purely for morale.At least it wasn’t COR going out or Fox!
That analysis is far too simplistic.
McVeigh is a very good judge of when to "hold" with a safe lateral kick or when to go in attack mode with a low trajectory forward kick that gives the opposition virtually no chance of a spoil or mark. The important part here is that we RETAIN POSSESSION!
Lloyd, conversely, often just punts it long and high to a contest which inevitably results in a stoppage or, worse still - a turnover. In other words, he can be a momentum killer. That is before we even begin to discuss Lloyd's penchant for turnovers from kick ins which result in goals being gifted to opposing forwards right in front of the sticks.
McVeigh's decision making, kicking efficiency and execution are FAR superior to Lloyd's, as is his bodywork. Lloyd's only advantage over McVeigh is his closing speed and speed in general.
Otherwise, it is bordering on an insult to compare the two. The fact that Lloyd won a Skilton whilst we played our worst season in a decade only reinforces this view.
*disclaimer, am a one-eyed Swans supporter.
I'd take Sydney's youth hands down at this point. I've arranged both team's players by games played below, and for me the Geelong lot is full of players who have shown "glimpses" for a 10-20 stretch of games whilst still being supported by a midfield of prime Dangerfield, Selwood, Duncan, and sub-prime Ablett. Lets face it, based on "glimpses" Ronke should be on his way to his first Brownlow by now.
For mine the Sydney youth has the runs on the board, and are playing a much larger role in driving the team forward than their Geelong counterparts.
Games / Age (rounded down)
SYDNEY GEELONG
Heeney (90/23) Kolojdashni (80/23)
Jones (82/24) Parfitt (43/21)
Hewett (81/23) Cockatoo (34/22)
Papley (70/22) Kelly (33/24)
Mills (65/22) Parsons (32/22)
Hayward (47/20) Henry (31/20)
Clarke (46/21) Oconnor (17/22)
Florent (42/20) Guthrie (17/20)
Aliir (38/24) Ratugolea (16/20)
Melican (27/22) Fogarty (15/20)
Ronke (23/21) Miers (10/20)
Mccartin (23/19) Atkins (9/23)
Dawson (14/22) Buzza (9/23)
Blakey (9/19) Clark (9/18)
Rose (9/23) Constable (7/20)
COR (7/23) Jones (7/20)
Rowbottom (3/18) Narkle (6/21)
Stoddart (2/19) Simpson (6/20)
Cameron (1/23) Okunbor (0/20)
Mcinnerney (1/18) Krueger (0/19)
Maibaum (0/21) Brownless (0/19)
Ling (0/20) Tarca (0/19)
Hirst (0/19) Kennerley (0/18)
Foot (0/18) Jarvis (0/18)
I think it's insulting to Lloyd personally, so now what?