Round 16 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Berry OUT
Greenwood to MIDS
Nankervis to FWDS
Gawn IN
:lock::lock::lock::lock::lock::lock::lock::lock::lock:


~$100K left in the bank

If Nank fails again:
Nank -> Jacobs or Mummy (via Ryder to FWDS)
Nank is back!! Happy days, don't have to trade him now

Just the 1 trade, Berry to Gawn
$100k in the bank and 4 trades left for a rainy day
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You must have like 2 left? :eek:

Yep and I am holding onto them now for grim life! :eek:

Happy with my team now, Lynch is just too much of a rollercoaster for me. I hate having to rely on my SC players to kick bags of goals to score well.

Team is complete to me with only Shaw being my iffy weakness at D6 but he got 85 today which was ok.

I will just try and loophole Nank and Greenwood at F6 whenever I can and use Greenwood to cover forward and mids.

Hopefully Shaz, Cousins and one of Brown/Bolton all come back NEXT WEEK (hear me Shaz, NEXT WEEK, I need you for the captain loophole THIS WEEK!) to add some more depth to my benches. :rainbow:
 
Last edited:
Who goes out of Higgins and nank for yeo?
 
Anyone considering trading Sloane like me? Had him for the past 4 weeks and he's been putrid. Clearly can't handle a tag.

I have the option of trading him to Gawn, or trading Murphy for him, who turned it on yesterday and scored 110+. One has to go as I don't have enough cash to trade another to Gawn.

Can Sloane turn his form around at all? The most concerning was on numerous occasions his teammates didn't pass the ball to him when he was free and in space. It's like he's deliberately being used as a decoy to draw opponents and create space.

Thoughts?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Gawn scored 96 and has a 184 breakeven. It's not (yet close to) the right time.
yeah, fair call. I've been panicking to get him in but think it might be ok to wait another week or so.

Nank putting up a decent score has certainly helped the decision making process.
 
Did you trade this week?

Yep. :$

Lynch > Billings to cover Jelwood as I only had North Hibberd as cover.

Couldn't afford to loose cash league match as ladder positions are tight as.

Plus opponent didn't have Jelwood (what else is new? :rolleyes:)

Seems bad now with Lynch scoring 128 but I think it will be a good trade in the long run.

I just can't stand KPF's, they are a rollercoaster and too up and down for me.

Lynch will probably score a 30 odd next week against Sydney.
 
Seems bad now with Lynch scoring 128 but I think it will be a good trade in the long run.

I just can't stand KPF's, they are a rollercoaster and too up and down for me.

Lynch will probably score a 30 odd next week against Sydney.
So why did you get him in the first place?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top