Round 5 Captain

[Richo83]

To be honest I'm struggling to find players who aren't going to play. I don't have Ablett (yes I know) and I'm sweating on someone like Smedts, Stephenson or Redden not playing and not being a late inclusion.

I have Boyd, but I'm kinda disappointed I did do the loopage and didn't just put the captain on Swan.

 

[persepolis76]

Nice day out for Swan.

 

[Jezza Jenkins]

boyd to crack the double ton

 

[Spider Klein]

Take Sidebums 109 or go for Mitchell or Selwood. Hmm tough choice.

Same position. Sidebottom 109 or back Boyd.

 

[Atavistic]

Same position. Sidebottom 109 or back Boyd.

Pretty easy decision.

 

[Toffee Lion]

Boyd against GWS?

If he doesn't score 120+ i'll be shocked.

 

[W.C. Fry]

Yeah if i had Boyd i would back him in for sure.

Raines held Ablett to a low score last week and feel as if he might do the same to Selwood this week. Might have to just trust Mitchell. Knowing my luck if I went Sidebum with Ablett on the ground then some other midfielder would be a late out and i'd get a 0.

 

[mrpig]

Boyd against GWS?

If he doesn't score 120+ i'll be shocked.

what about j,mac,
boyd was held to a low score by magner, what about j,mac's tag (or am i an idiot for mentioning this)

 

[Ol Battler]

Had Pendlebury as VC however I am going to roll the dice and put the C on Goddard - Against the likes of Melbourne I think he should carve them up.

The only other 2 options I believe I have otherwise would be Franklin or Deledio.

Edit: btw i originally voted pendlebury a week ago

 

[Butler]

what about j,mac,
boyd was held to a low score by magner, what about j,mac's tag (or am i an idiot for mentioning this)

Nah it is a good point. Boyd will be my captain (Watson 104 VC) but i'm not overly confident after last weekend. If the ball spends most of the time in the Bulldogs forward line then it's not exactly ideal for Boyd. I'm hoping they just let him run free. The good thing is that he never has two bad games in a row.

 

[Benno_900]

Have all of Swan, Pendles and Sidebottom.

Went Swan VC

(Cue mid late withdrawal or Boyd 200 score)

 

[Schulzenfest]

Had Pendlebury as VC however I am going to roll the dice and put the C on Goddard - Against the likes of Melbourne I think he should carve them up.

Goddard is the type who occasionally doesn't come to play against weaker opposition. Then again, he's also the type who occasionally spends the whole game looking for cheap easy ball against weaker opposition.

Chances are he'll score less than 80 or above 120 IMO.

 

[lmach]

Having trouble deciding between Goddard, Selwood and Thompson or keeping Pendlebury's 113??

 

[Jessbek]

Having trouble deciding between Goddard, Selwood and Thompson or keeping Pendlebury's 113??

Jeez, you've posted this about 4 times now...
I'm going Selwood because he should go more than 113 against the Lions. If you are soo worried about Raines' tag, go to the Lions Board and ask who they think Raines will go to, for how long and the impact he will have on the game if your feeling adventurous go Goddard because he will either go terrible or really big. And if your happy with your captain getting 113, you've got Pendles. I wouldn't go Thompson...

 

[nicK_]

Okay quick question, I went swan as my VC and i have Mitchell as C,

So my question is if I unselect mitchell as my C AND SELECT no C Will I still end up getting double points with swan since he's my VC ?

 

[W.C. Fry]

No you cannot unselect your C. What you need to do is have your C on someone who isn't playing - like Ablett. The sub on your bench takes Abletts spot as he isn't playing and your VC takes over the C as Ablett isn't playing.

 

[nicK_]

No you cannot unselect your C. What you need to do is have your C on someone who isn't playing - like Ablett. The sub on your bench takes Abletts spot as he isn't playing and your VC takes over the C as Ablett isn't playing.

So have abblett on the feild as my c but have for example McDonald as theEMG on the bench to take abblett spot but McDonald won't get the c swanny will ) ????!!!!

 

[entourage]

That is correct, Nick-check the random question thread for clarification. It's all there. That is exactly what I'm doing to take swanny's score.

 

[James]

Well, with a lot of teams putting the VC on Swan this week, I'm going to roll the dice and put the C on Ziebell in his first game for me.

 

[lmach]

Jeez, you've posted this about 4 times now...
I'm going Selwood because he should go more than 113 against the Lions. If you are soo worried about Raines' tag, go to the Lions Board and ask who they think Raines will go to, for how long and the impact he will have on the game if your feeling adventurous go Goddard because he will either go terrible or really big. And if your happy with your captain getting 113, you've got Pendles. I wouldn't go Thompson...

Thanks mate. And sorry, I'm just a bit stressed

Well, with a lot of teams putting the VC on Swan this week, I'm going to roll the dice and put the C on Ziebell in his first game for me.

We know, you've told us 100 times...

 

[loeskow]

Take pendles VC 113, or put the C on Rocky? any thoughts?

 

[yamahamoto]

I have Swan as VC and have Sandiland confirmed out in my team. Do I still leave Sindiland in the team and put C on him to get the captain loophole working? Havnt done it before. Thanks

 

[Benno_900]

I have Swan as VC and have Sandiland confirmed out in my team. Do I still leave Sindiland in the team and put C on him to get the captain loophole working? Havnt done it before. Thanks

Yes, that'll work.

Set an emg in the rucks for cover.

 

[Richo83]

Are people confident that Kennedy wont play? Because he's my captain at the moment. I could try Redden or Stephenson but I'm not sure about those.

 

[James]

Are people confident that Kennedy wont play? Because he's my captain at the moment. I could try Redden or Stephenson but I'm not sure about those.

He's not named as one of their emergencies, so no he won't play.