SSwans2011
Hall of Famer
Parker's BE is less than half Zorko's, so him.Yep tossing up between the 2.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Parker's BE is less than half Zorko's, so him.Yep tossing up between the 2.
I'm keeping Daicos and Martin as bench cover and they will be the last to go.Who to upgrade this week is the big question.
Daicos/Martin- have they peaked? One more? Or even hold for bench cover?
NOD - were the two 100's a fluke? Seems like a score under 60 is more likely.
Gibcus/DeKon- probably still got some cash to make.
Ward - Think I'll have about $320K in the bank, don't know if it will be enough to get a super premo.
Im pretty sure come round 1 you will see most teams (the ones that actually follow SC) will have 90% of the team the sameI’m not saying don’t get them but balance and loading premiums towards the end of the byes will give the optimum outcome. A really bad bye round can look as low as 1,500 points which is really hard to make up no matter how good your next 2 are. Everyone else will also be improving over the next 2 as well putting you way behind.
I agree some players are just too good to turn down though and you still have to get at their lowest point. It will be interesting to see if more nearly complete teams this year means the bye impact is lessened.
I think that’s the way I’m leaning. Also I feel like there are more options down back so Zorko not a must have. Parker could be.Parker's BE is less than half Zorko's, so him.
Exactly what i believe
I'm strongly considering bringing Parker in next week, even though his value won't be that great anymore. He'd be M8 and Martin F6, so either both lines, or my choice of which one, would effectively be complete.I think that’s the way I’m leaning. Also I feel like there are more options down back so Zorko not a must have. Parker could be.
I'm strongly considering bringing Parker in next week, even though his value won't be that great anymore. He'd be M8 and Martin F6, so either both lines, or my choice of which one, would effectively be complete.
Haha thank you, terrible mistake.FTFY
Yes, very much so.Is Vlaustin a trap?
He'll be a keeper that likely won't get much cheaper. Will still be $40k cheaper than his starting price and is proven to be more durable than someone like Heeney.I’m ngl, Parker at 70k more than he was start of last round is a hard sell.
105 averaging forward yes but will be 550k at that point.
I'd pick the premo which takes your worse rookie off the field.OK .....follow my logic
I can get both Cripps and Parker .....Cripps the biggest scorer & will go up $40K after this round, 46% ownership ....logic says follow & not allow 46% a continued advantage
The flipside ....Parker is still a POD ....has the dual position, which is invaluable, as I cash DPP rookies in
Parker to ave 105-108 for the season .....just plays every week ?
Cripps to ave 115+ ....but still has that injury ??
On the basis of climbing rankings ....who do you choose ?
Titch will come good second half of the year. All the young kids will tire and they’ll need him in the centre.I own Titch too. What do you think the issue is with him right now? A 140, a 100 and a 78. Seems too hot and cold at the moment but I will persist with him.
YesIs it a bad idea to sideways Bailey Smith for Tom Stewart?
I can't understand the people bringing in Wines.
Why would you take the risk with someone who was troubled by a heart condition only 4 weeks ago?
Yes he is cheap for his output but you would want to be confident that he is going to play every game from now on.
I actually believe that when the good teams are complete they will have enough cash generation to have a 'Spare Premo or 2"I'm strongly considering bringing Parker in next week, even though his value won't be that great anymore. He'd be M8 and Martin F6, so either both lines, or my choice of which one, would effectively be complete.
I can't understand the people bringing in Wines.
Why would you take the risk with someone who was troubled by a heart condition only 4 weeks ago?
Yes he is cheap for his output but you would want to be confident that he is going to play every game from now on.
Yes.
May never be an issue again.
I'm actually more worried about Patty Cripps hammy that he mysteriously only missed a week with.
Definitely. My' complete' team I refer to I should be able to reach with 10 trades remaining (and that includes upgrading Martin), pending injuries. And I should still have quality on the bench to turn into an extra premo or 2, like you say.I actually believe that when the good teams are complete they will have enough cash generation to have a 'Spare Premo or 2"
You still think it was a hammy?Yes.
May never be an issue again.
I'm actually more worried about Patty Cripps hammy that he mysteriously only missed a week with.
Yes.
May never be an issue again.
I'm actually more worried about Patty Cripps hammy that he mysteriously only missed a week with.