Current Trial Russell Hill & Carol Clay - Wonnangatta *Pilot Greg Lynn Pleads Not Guilty to Murder

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #44
MOD NOTICE

This case is sub judice as under consideration by the courts. Sub judice contempt can occur if information is published that may be prejudicial to the court proceedings.

Please do not state as fact that which is opinion. Also, use 'IMO' and 'allegedly' a lot.

Rules - Updated Crime Board Rules - READ BEFORE POSTING

General Information The BigFooty Crime board is a community that fosters discussion on current and past crimes, some which have social and media notoriety, that attracts the attention of public opinion and discussion on such matters. Please read these rules very carefully, both the Big Footy...
www.bigfooty.com
www.bigfooty.com

On the Greg Lynn committal proceedings Crown Prosecutor Mr Dickie said 'It is clear hopefully from the document, and if it's not clear from the document it's clear hopefully from the charges put before the court, that it is alleged of course that the accused acted with murderous intent when he allegedly killed the two victims.'
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

I really hope there hasn't been any downgrading of charges.

Manslaughter has become the new black in the last decade with some cases.

There's got to be a way that murder can stick if someone causes too much damage to a body or completely disposes of it in a way that they would cop 6-10 years because the intent can't be proved.

I'm assuming this is what is trial ploy is.
 
I really hope there hasn't been any downgrading of charges.

Manslaughter has become the new black in the last decade with some cases.

There's got to be a way that murder can stick if someone causes too much damage to a body or completely disposes of it in a way that they would cop 6-10 years because the intent can't be proved.

I'm assuming this is what is trial ploy is.

If intent can't be be proved, it isn't murder. Murder is to intentionally cause death. That is, the moments before a death, not after.
 
I really hope there hasn't been any downgrading of charges.

Manslaughter has become the new black in the last decade with some cases.
Happy to say I have no idea of the current set ups in the prosecutorial branch but I'm reminded of the US system where convictions are more important than outcome

ie plea bargaining an outcome that sees a ''win'' recorded for the prosecution but leaves the families feeling disappointed

Is that a consideration for the DPP in Victoria/Australia ?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Happy to say I have no idea of the current set ups in the prosecutorial branch but I'm reminded of the US system where convictions are more important than outcome

ie plea bargaining an outcome that sees a ''win'' recorded for the prosecution but leaves the families feeling disappointed

Is that a consideration for the DPP in Victoria/Australia ?

Look at the Borce Ristevski case. Despite it being a case of a domestic violence killing his representation was able to agree manslaughter in that case in lieu of a trial. Even after his attempts at concealing the crime. I'm not sure the family of Karen Ristevski would have viewed that as a win for justice.
 
Look at the Borce Ristevski case. Despite it being a case of a domestic violence killing his representation was able to agree manslaughter in that case in lieu of a trial. Even after his attempts at concealing the crime. I'm not sure the family of Karen Ristevski would have viewed that as a win for justice.
Courts don't impliment "Justice" (whatever that means)

Courts hear the evidence presented before it and pass a judgement based on the evidence and arguement provided with reference to legislation, precedent and case law.

Many may agree with your view of this matter but for a murder charge to stick, it has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's actions were either with an intention to kill or an intention to inflict grievous bodily harm upon the Victim.

If that is not proven the Court must find the accused not guilty and they walk

If, in the judgement of the Court or the Prosecution. there is a possibility that the evidence that can be presented leaves a possibility of a person being aquitted on the reasonable doubt grounds, they may downgrade the charges or entertain a plea to a lesser charge to secure a conviction

I know it doesn't satisfy the concept of "Justice" to many people but a punishment imposed is better that someone walking free to the charge
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top