philreich
Premium Platinum
- Mar 2, 2014
- 64,317
- 165,968
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
One slight amendment (I agree with the rest). I'm not questioning the timing of the decision - I'm questioning why we resigned Ken at all. I don't for a second buy the lie that Hinkley is the best possible candidate for the job: in fact, given the last decade of failures, I strenuously suggest that he's the WORST possible candidate!!!!!Dear David,
We may have short memories David but at least what we do remember is accurate not like the incorrect garbage you just served up.
If you are going to quote facts to support your Board's poor decision making make sure your facts are correct.
Here is a fact for you, you got it wrong as you and your Board should have waited until after the finals were done and dusted, that way the criterion for Ken's reappointment was winning finals.
You keep going back to our past but how about you project into the future? How about you tell us what are your criteria for reappointing Ken Hinkley at the end of 2025? What do you see as the benchmark David?
Whenever you attempt to justify your decision you keep saying 'we' as if the entire football club is united behind your decision. That is another error in judgement as a significant percentage of the supporter base question the timing of your decision.
Signed
A Concerned Supporter