Looks like by the time we finally have someone worth taking F/S they are going to cost us a premium.
On the flipside, so will some of Sydney's Academy picks.
On the flipside, so will some of Sydney's Academy picks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Looks like by the time we finally have someone worth taking F/S they are going to cost us a premium.
On the flipside, so will some of Sydney's Academy picks.
Just heard about the possible changes, very interesting.
For anyone who missed TFS here is an example for Sydney to get Heeney because he is rated top 5 if they win the flag they might (under possible new changes) have to give up 1st and 2nd rounders same as Collingwood with Darcy Moore.
Watch here if you wish (i might have it wrong): http://www.jump-in.com.au/show/aflfootyshow/videos/3679920959001/
The only issue with f/s is that it benefits the clubs with high draft picks (aka, finals teams) a lot more then it does the bottom end teams.
Sydney have two next season Callum Mills and Dunkley (well they were used as examples on TFS)Unless the player is rated to be better than your second but not as good as your first. If we have pick 4 and the highest a team is willing to offer is pick 7 then we get them for our second which is a pretty good deal.
That new system they are talking about is a step in the right direction but what happens if a team has two highly rated players in the same year? Unless the AFL bring in trading of future picks and allows them to be used on father sons you could still end up with 2 top 5 picks for your first 3 selections.
Unless the player is rated to be better than your second but not as good as your first. If we have pick 4 and the highest a team is willing to offer is pick 7 then we get them for our second which is a pretty good deal.
That new system they are talking about is a step in the right direction but what happens if a team has two highly rated players in the same year? Unless the AFL bring in trading of future picks and allows them to be used on father sons you could still end up with 2 top 5 picks for your first 3 selections.
True, but say the Hawks with pick 17 will only have to spend pick 34 on that same player as far as a I know?
Even if they must spend the first rounder, well they just upgraded their 17 to 7 for nothing.
I guess it still works both ways, i just feel it allows high performing teams to maintain a high draft pick intake with none of the hurt of bottoming out.
I can't answer that. But I DO know that Pelchen and Co have done tons of work with them so far, far more than the Saints have ever done in this area before. And Pelchen has this, uh, "outside the box" approach to things - as evidenced by Holmes. He will use any legitimate avenue he can think of to make the team have stronger players. I trust him to be all over the whole thing with FS, and the players eligible for us.Just a quick question to Rahul or anyone else that knows… are any of our upcoming father/son potentials actually any good?
Yeah, as soon as I heard Damo talking about this last night I started thinking about how it would affect Sydney next year, when they could have both Mills and Dunkley being rated as top 5 picks (Mills is even being touted as worth pick 1) and even if the AFL said they had to give up their picks in all of the first 4 or 5 rounds, they would still make out of it like bandits. So then I started to wonder if they might make them give up their first pick the following year as well. But then what happens if they have someone highly rated that year as well?That new system they are talking about is a step in the right direction but what happens if a team has two highly rated players in the same year? Unless the AFL bring in trading of future picks and allows them to be used on father sons you could still end up with 2 top 5 picks for your first 3 selections.
Yeah, as soon as I heard Damo talking about this last night I started thinking about how it would affect Sydney next year, when they could have both Mills and Dunkley being rated as top 5 picks (Mills is even being touted as worth pick 1) and even if the AFL said they had to give up their picks in all of the first 4 or 5 rounds, they would still make out of it like bandits. So then I started to wonder if they might make them give up their first pick the following year as well. But then what happens if they have someone highly rated that year as well?
This whole Sydney academy thing could get out of hand very quickly if the AFL aren't careful, especially if the game continues to grow in NSW and if Sydney are able to get the most talented into an elite environment from a young age.
Nothing outstanding, as said here I think Rice is the most draft able, but you never know. Some of the younger guys have had a bit of hype in the earlier pages.Just a quick question to Rahul or anyone else that knows… are any of our upcoming father/son potentials actually any good?
Harvey because he's crap at football and we don't want him.Good move by the club, am curious as to why Rice and Harvey weren't there. Rice is more worrying due to the links to Carltank
He's not very good at football eitherHarvey because he's crap at football and we don't want him.
Rice because... well, I suspect we know the answer, but I don't like it, so I won't say...
You don't rate Rice? I'd really like to know more about his footballing ability - hardly anybody seems to actually know.He's not very good at football either
Bailey is very talented and highly skilful. He is a bit over 6' in the old measure and solid as well. He has a bit of the Rice mongrel, but just a bit more hidden than his old man. However, it does come out when needed. He has played a few senior games for the team his old man coaches (when not playing juniors) and runs rings around those country players. He has pace off the mark but won't break any sprint records.
He will make AFL if he can improve on two things.
1. Endurance (many talented juniors are lazy because they still dominate with skill alone).
2. Learns to read the play better. Most of his junior footy was played either as ruck (great leap) or CHF. Therefore, the ball always came his way and he didn't need to read the play as much as others.
The Blues could do much much worse than drafting Bailey in the 2015 ND. He will make a great BP/HBB until he becomes an on baller after a couple of preseasons.