toxic
Premium Gold
Loved the guy up until last year.
That aside, he's never good for more than 15 games a year.
Thats the drama and reason i keep avoiding him as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Loved the guy up until last year.
That aside, he's never good for more than 15 games a year.
Loved the guy up until last year.
That aside, he's never good for more than 15 games a year.
Any love for Brent Staker this year?
'Injury-plagued utility Brent Staker is flying this pre-season, however key position player Luke McGuane is still experiencing some soreness in his knee post-surgery and is struggling to complete back-to-back sessions.'
87 average in 2010 and with the added midfield depth this year would see more inside 50's.
Devon is interesting. .
what u expecting from him bud?
Priced at??
$246,800Priced at??
Bit steep, $246,800
$246,800
AgreedToo many other options at or below that price I'd say.
I reckon 100+ average for Devon this year. Gun. Has played the 2nd most games of all the GWS youngsters. I see him as a bit like Zorko, but more class & upside.
Bit steep, $246,800
$246,800
Defence does not excite me. Can't see many there averaging 100+ so may as well stack up elsewhere and bargain hunt.It's nice having 5 premo mids....but your defence
Don't think Rocky will lose points just because Rich plays. I see Bris being the big improver so more points to share. Pendles/Beams/Sidey/Swan didn't affect each other's scoring much.Wouldn't take rocky and rich. By taking rich you're betting on rocky losing points.
What's the team name? The mid priced backs?
Clark won't score that much. Better and cheaper options out there.
Defence does not excite me. Can't see many there averaging 100+ so may as well stack up elsewhere and bargain hunt.
Don't think Rocky will lose points just because Rich plays. I see Bris being the big improver so more points to share. Pendles/Beams/Sidey/Swan didn't affect each other's scoring much.
Clarke, as all <200k players are at this time of the year, is a place holder.
Rich, redden, rocky, beams, Hanley, Zorko. They all going to ton up each week?
Rocky beams will
hanley maybe
others no
And u missed christensen
8 tons out of 21 games. Only 3 scores below 70. 115 average over last 5.
Rocky and Beams will. Rich fully fit would. Others touch and go.
I quite like that you have 3 premos in def, although I use the word "premo" loosely. However, i think you could get someone who will perform similarly to K, Kolodjashnij for a much cheaper price, example Brendan Whitecross, just a note and I know rookies are only temporary but scharenberg is injured and likely won't play until halfway through the year so if you are already debating over rookies as I am, you should probably take him out of your calculations.
To start of, can you tell me what all the rage with Henderspud and Steinberg is? From waht I've seen from both of them, they've done nothng to say they will improve from their previous output, particularly henderson who will become more of a key backman with the departure of ben rutten? Besides that I think you could possibly do with Malceski, you need some premium scoring in defence to free up another midfield cash cow space.
Speaking of the midfield, IMO you have gone far to strong, I usually try to have the same number of rookies on teh field as premos/mid-pricers combined, this allows for a huge cash inflow that you can use to do some serious upgrades from rounds 8 to 12. Personally I'd dump Parker and Rich for rookies and upgrade another defender and save a little money to spread across the rest of your team.
Rucks, same as mine got nothing to criticise.
Forwards, also very similar to mine, again I quite like Bontempelli at F5 and I am tossing up between him, motlop and a couple others. Personally I'm quite strongly against Clark as he has only had one premium year in his entire career... 4 years ago.... at brisbane........ since then he has been repeatedly and IMO irreparably damaged both physically and mentally and I also think he will be starved of opportunity at Geelong considering the wealth of talls they have recently acquired.
I quite like your team, I personally won't be going with this strategy as its a little ballsy for me having no defence... but it could work out I guess
Before you tear it apart, I think Burgoyne and Shaw will improve to premium scoring due to various reasons, and I will not under any circumstances pick up Mitch Clark, he is old, fat and broken both physically and mentally. As well as this he has only had one season in his long season of premium scoring, the rest were average or non existant due to injury.
Have at it!!
View attachment 101404
My main one for Burgoyne (tossing between him and Gibson) is that Gibson will become a rebounding defender with the arrival of Frawley so Burgoyne will cop a little less attention from defensive forwards.What are your reasons for thinking Burgoyne's output will increase? He's 32, I can't see him increasing his average especially judging by his previous 4 years. Malceski slightly overpriced IMO. Also think there are better options than Christensen. Hard to tell how rookies will perform obviously but I'd downgrade Petracca to a cheap rookie and upgrade Christensen to an elite mid
Maybe Smith will move to the middle but they don't have another tall to play key defence afaik, so I doubt Henderson will fill a flanker type roleIf Brodie Smith moves into the midfield that might allow Henderson to full his half-back role.