Player Watch Shane McAdam

[spenze]

sorry what is the significance?

Top left corner, the hit on the GWS player he got suspended for

 

[LoBu]

Anybody catch Shane's new Insta profile pic?

I thought it was a good bump too!

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[rabidcrow]

SERIOUSLY!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

C'mon Olsen

Fire up again, son

 

[Mattrox]

Would this be enough to get a supreme court injunction.

Systematic biases unfairly impacting a team putside Melbourne. Twice the year the AFL admitted "mistakes". McAdam was suspended based on potential to do damage, but no physical damage was sustained.

Now a player who hits McAdam high in contravention of the rules is let off from a suspension but caused significant damage to the head of McAdam.

This is a systematic pattern within 1 season and the AFL needs to overhaul all procedures to eliminate a bias.



On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Burtonsgottago]

Would this be enough to get a supreme court injunction.

Systematic biases unfairly impacting a team putside Melbourne. Twice the year the AFL admitted "mistakes". McAdam was suspended based on potential to do damage, but no physical damage was sustained.

Now a player who hits McAdam high in contravention of the rules is let off from a suspension but caused significant damage to the head of McAdam.

This is a systematic pattern within 1 season and the AFL needs to overhaul all procedures to eliminate a bias.



On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app

This is ridiculous now.. seriously, what is going on?

Over to you Olsen..

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Would this be enough to get a supreme court injunction.

Systematic biases unfairly impacting a team putside Melbourne. Twice the year the AFL admitted "mistakes". McAdam was suspended based on potential to do damage, but no physical damage was sustained.

Now a player who hits McAdam high in contravention of the rules is let off from a suspension but caused significant damage to the head of McAdam.

This is a systematic pattern within 1 season and the AFL needs to overhaul all procedures to eliminate a bias.



On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app

Surely we should be asking for a please explain over the 2 McAdam incidents & the overhaul of the tribunal system.

It's corrupt & a farce... & fails the pub test.

It's inequity like this which will have members walk away from the AFL as we clearly getting a raw deal from this amateur run competition.

 

[BRL121]

Would this be enough to get a supreme court injunction.

Systematic biases unfairly impacting a team putside Melbourne. Twice the year the AFL admitted "mistakes". McAdam was suspended based on potential to do damage, but no physical damage was sustained.

Now a player who hits McAdam high in contravention of the rules is let off from a suspension but caused significant damage to the head of McAdam.

This is a systematic pattern within 1 season and the AFL needs to overhaul all procedures to eliminate a bias.



On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app

You're missing the point.
All they have to do for justification is to compare with the Mad-Dog Mackay incident where we won the appeal against St Kilda.

I seem to recall that we were shamed in the media for trying that appeal: where is the shame on Sydney for trying this time?

 

[cleanhands]

Seriously I’m in a daze, “potential to cause injury” it broke his ………n cheekbone wtf AFL you marfia ridden arseholes

 

[BunjiMC]

If you needed more of a reason to give the membership.... here it is. After the weekend we've had they still don't give a ****.

 

[NSWCROW]

Chuck this one in the " Farmer on Doughty / Welsh on Goodwin / Mcpharlin on stevens / Franklin on Otten / Viney on Lynch " file

 

[cleanhands]

If you needed more of a reason to give the membership.... here it is. After the weekend we've had they still don't give a *.

If I was Shane I would be going to the club and saying do something about this or I’m walking away from football

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

If you needed more of a reason to give the membership.... here it is. After the weekend we've had they still don't give a *.

Yeah, I reckon many Crows members are thinking the same thanks to this corrupt competition where we are never going to get a fair go with the current clowns running the show.

Gil just **** off as you promised!

 

[Pugsley]

Time we showed a backbone. Blatant bias.

 

[Crow till I die]

If I was Shane I would be going to the club and saying do something about this or I’m walking away from football

Or..i am going to go to another club

 

[El Doederino]

So the indigenous player hits a white player = suspension

White players hits an indigenous player = no suspension

Seems kinda racist

 

[Eagleboy2011]

I'm sure Robbo is on the turps again. He is saying the tribunal is correct. Wakley the same.

 

[cleanhands]

Or..i am going to go to another club

I actually thought they may increase his penalty given the injury to Shane, I’m DUMBfounded

 

[mick500]

So he broke McAdams cheek bone but it was downgraded from high impact, correct? Wtf.

 

[BunjiMC]

Yeah, I reckon many Crows members are thinking the same thanks to this corrupt competition where we are never going to get a fair go with the current clowns running the show.

Gil just * off as you promised!

We aren't winning a flag. It's as simple as that. We won't be allowed.

 

[Pugsley]

So the indigenous player hits a white player = suspension

White players hits an indigenous player = no suspension

Seems kinda racist

I think its more state bias.

 

[Pugsley]

I'm sure Robbo is on the turps again. He is saying the tribunal is correct. Wakley the same.

He is never sober. Hence his nickname Slobbo

 

[LiquidCrow]

So the indigenous player hits a white player = suspension

White players hits an indigenous player = no suspension

Seems kinda racist

I think this is the only angle that would possibly shame the AFL into doing something different.

 

[Soggy2112]

Shane must be ****ing ropable and rightly so.

He was suspended for “potential to cause injury” in what was a perfectly legal bump. But gets his cheekbone fractured in what we’ve all come to accept is not a legal action and the guy gets off?

 

[Crow till I die]

Could the crows appeal the tribunal decision?