- Moderator
- #1,101
Nek minnit
You know that expert opinion is still only opinion, right?
Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation.
Pape is a law lecturer and barrister.
4:3 judgment.
In case you don't know what that means:
4 judges disagreed with Mr Pape.
3 judges agreed with Mr Pape.
That's 8 experts.
Half gave one expert opinion.
The other half gave the opposite expert opinion.
I even bolded and underlined 'expert'.
Is that really the best you can come up with?
So where's your expert opinion that supports the claims you made? Who are they? And what have they said?