- Jan 13, 2013
- 23,799
- 47,913
- AFL Club
- West Coast
I think you'll find most purple fans would not agree that Amiss has been largely irrelevantHough has been very good this year, while Amiss has been largely irrelevant. Id still have Hough ahead
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think you'll find most purple fans would not agree that Amiss has been largely irrelevantHough has been very good this year, while Amiss has been largely irrelevant. Id still have Hough ahead
They have already been told they are not getting one.What do we think happens with North this year? Does the AFL just keep handing them PP's because they're still shit?
It's what 2-3 consecutive years of PPs for them?
If they do get one, how will it affect ours?
ThankgodThey have already been told they are not getting one.
They already got 2 for this year.What do we think happens with North this year? Does the AFL just keep handing them PP's because they're still shit?
It's what 2-3 consecutive years of PPs for them?
If they do get one, how will it affect ours?
Ah excellent, so our 2nd round pick gets pushed back by a minimum of 2 from the get go...They already got 2 for this year.
Last year they were given 2 end of first round PP for the 2024 season and were told to use them or lose them. So they traded them away for.....remind me someone.
On Pixel 6 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
It’s not that North won’t apply, it’s that they already received and used priority picks this year.
Anyway back to us - acknowledge I’m in the minority here but no, we shouldn’t, nobody should ever get priority picks. The current system is broken beyond repair so if there’s one on offer, absolutely rort the system dry, fine. But if they said we’re not giving the Eagles one and we will use this as the springboard to never hand out another priority pick ever again I’d be happy to be the one who has to eat a bit of shit when the music stops for the greater good of the game.
What do we think happens with North this year? Does the AFL just keep handing them PP's because they're still shit?
It's what 2-3 consecutive years of PPs for them?
If they do get one, how will it affect ours?
Cheers mateWe aren't getting anything else, we got a future pick last year for this year that we could trade it away last year and we did.
Are all clubs that get a PP? At fault for their lists?
Who else would be?
Its a bit dumb to give 1 team priority picks and then say "well now never again". AFL got a few more years and few more picks to hand out to teams before they can cast this one aside.It’s not that North won’t apply, it’s that they already received and used priority picks this year.
Anyway back to us - acknowledge I’m in the minority here but no, we shouldn’t, nobody should ever get priority picks. The current system is broken beyond repair so if there’s one on offer, absolutely rort the system dry, fine. But if they said we’re not giving the Eagles one and we will use this as the springboard to never hand out another priority pick ever again I’d be happy to be the one who has to eat a bit of shit when the music stops for the greater good of the game.
The irony of this post is that we actually lost a game to a side that had 19 players on the field and then lost another game to them cos we made one too many interchanges.I’ve always been against PPs but you can’t have one set of rules for Norf and a different set of rules for us. May as well say Norf can have 19 players on the field. I don’t know what other metric you can use other than W/L so according to that we should be getting a 2R and 3R to trade then the 3x end of 1st next year.
We really should also be getting an end of 1R this year to allow for the fact that pick 19 became pick 30 in this pathetic excuse for a fair draft.
Well you’d think so wouldn’t you… Let’s see if Laura agrees in an attempt to (somewhat ironically) maintain a shred of integrity.The irony of this post is that we actually lost a game to a side that had 19 players on the field and then lost another game to them cos we made one too many interchanges.
Anyway I think youse should have exactly the same PPs we got over the last couple of years.
That would be fair wouldn't it?
Whilst I agree with you there, do you really think there is any chance that that's what will happen?The irony of this post is that we actually lost a game to a side that had 19 players on the field and then lost another game to them cos we made one too many interchanges.
Anyway I think youse should have exactly the same PPs we got over the last couple of years.
That would be fair wouldn't it?
You'll probably get something similar to our 22 PPs, a second and third. If you're as shit in 2025 you'll get moreWhilst I agree with you there, do you really think there is any chance that that's what will happen?
I give it zero percent chance that we'll get a GCS 2019 package (despite being worse than they were over three years) and about a 1% chance we'll get a North 2023/24 package.
Whilst I agree with you there, do you really think there is any chance that that's what will happen?
I give it zero percent chance that we'll get a GCS 2019 package (despite being worse than they were over three years) and about a 1% chance we'll get a North 2023/24 package.