backtothedraft
Senior List
- Sep 17, 2023
- 211
- 984
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Not sure it will add anything to those calling for communication but I believe the CEO is currently on AL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
How so? Genuinely curious why you would think this unless you think continuing to sell more games is a good thing. I want less games in Hobart and more games in Melbourne. Taking some from Hobart to WA is not a win.Jen Watt haters in shambles
9 in Melbourne, 2 in WA, none in Hobart is a win (especially if the $$$ are as good as Hobart in total as has been suggested). Fingers crossed for that outcome.How so? Genuinely curious why you would think this unless you think continuing to sell more games is a good thing. I want less games in Hobart and more games in Melbourne. Taking some from Hobart to WA is not a win.
Agree. I suggested the same thing 15+ years ago. I know our Football Dept spending was behind the times. I know we had to scrape for those profits, but IMO our only hope of being fully financially independent is to build a genuine warchest trust that makes a dividend each year and builds so that in 10-15 years we are bullet proof and have enough income that we don't even touch the capital. We don't need to be richer than everyone, but we do need to be better off than the worst teams like St Kilda at the moment as the AFL can't squeeze our finances and minimum spend if they have to do the same to other more favoured clubs.Only way we can get out of this cycle is to develop and investment fund. Might take a few years but a panel that invests a certain amount each year is essential to long term independence.
Until then, we sell games.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I think the fact it’s somewhere warm and will be in a single block will make this a much more attractive sell to players and any Melbourne members who want to fly out there for that period.9 in Melbourne, 2 in WA, none in Hobart is a win (especially if the $$$ are as good as Hobart in total as has been suggested). Fingers crossed for that outcome.
Ideally “All” our home games should be played in Melbourne. After all we are the North “Melbourne” Football Club. So “Like” is not the term I’d be using. :stern lookDo you like this deal, Zondor? Or not prepared to say?
We have no revenues outside core business so some kind of warchest that generates interest or dividends would be terrific. Hopefully Jen and the executive team have plans.Agree. I suggested the same thing 15+ years ago. I know our Football Dept spending was behind the times. I know we had to scrape for those profits, but IMO our only hope of being fully financially independent is to build a genuine warchest trust that makes a dividend each year and builds so that in 10-15 years we are bullet proof and have enough income that we don't even touch the capital. We don't need to be richer than everyone, but we do need to be better off than the worst teams like St Kilda at the moment as the AFL can't squeeze our finances and minimum spend if they have to do the same to other more favoured clubs.
We will be flying private jet.From Melbourne? Which airline?
Does that come with our membership?
Will go from selling 4 games to 2 games and make the same money.How so? Genuinely curious why you would think this unless you think continuing to sell more games is a good thing. I want less games in Hobart and more games in Melbourne. Taking some from Hobart to WA is not a win.
no, will be selling 4 - two to WA, two to TasWill go from selling 4 games to 2 games and make the same money.
How WA deal makes North Melbourne the AFL's Expendables — SEN
This is not North Melbourne going ‘we’ve found the unexplored and unexploited frontier in WA’… so let’s not be treated like lemmings.apple.news
No current season stats available
Interestingly it was mentioned on SEN Tassie this morning that the two games that we are giving up are likely to be picked up by other clubs. Also suggested the two games next year will be the last time we play home games in Tassie
I wonder how this works out as we still have a binding contract for 4 games on the map in 2025. If we reneg on the current deal and play 2, do we cop a financial penalty for dishonouring the agreement?Interestingly it was mentioned on SEN Tassie this morning that the two games that we are giving up are likely to be picked up by other clubs. Also suggested the two games next year will be the last time we play home games in Tassie
If the AFL and Tasmania are able to get two better drawing clubs to play home games in Hobart and satisfy the contract, I think it will be a win for all including North.I wonder how this works out as we still have a binding contract for 4 games on the map in 2025. If we reneg on the current deal and play 2, do we cop a financial penalty for dishonouring the agreement?
Just thinking about it, if you take the 2 Tassie games away, at what, $500k (?) , then throw in 2 inferior profiting games at Marvel the net gain for the club coffers would be somewhere in the region 1.25/ 1.35mil perhaps.
If we get back to 9 in Melbourne, then it's a reasonable win for the core I guess.
Same.I just can’t see myself coughing up $2000 or whatever for flights and accommodation to head over there
I wonder how this works out as we still have a binding contract for 4 games on the map in 2025. If we reneg on the current deal and play 2, do we cop a financial penalty for dishonouring the agreement?
Just thinking about it, if you take the 2 Tassie games away, at what, $500k (?) , then throw in 2 inferior profiting games at Marvel the net gain for the club coffers would be somewhere in the region 1.25/ 1.35mil perhaps.
If we get back to 9 in Melbourne, then it's a reasonable win for the core I guess.
Same.
Whether the club likes it or not, I'm not going to support home games away from Vic financially in any way. If they're banking on our travel in any way prepare to be let down. I loved Hobart but won't go again as long as we sell home games there. Same for WA. If the club wants an extra few hundred a year out of me they can offer me more home games in Melbourne or a North Melbourne Patrons investment scheme and I'll put my hand in my pocket.
Yes the Tasmanians appear to have become disinterested in watching us live in Hobart so it will be in the AFL's interests to send some other teams down there until their own team debuts in 2028 (or whenever it is).If the AFL and Tasmania are able to get two better drawing clubs to play home games in Hobart and satisfy the contract, I think it will be a win for all including North.
Two games is the most we’ll be selling, until it inevitably moves to three….then back to four after the club becomes overly reliant on the cash.How so? Genuinely curious why you would think this unless you think continuing to sell more games is a good thing. I want less games in Hobart and more games in Melbourne. Taking some from Hobart to WA is not a win.