Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
yeah fair enough. but i dont think geelong will get home games collingwood, essendon, or finals against victorian teams (perhaps aside from nth.melbourne and melbourne). why would they play in front of 42,000 at skilled when they could in front of 60,000+ at the MCG.pretty sure he is, but we have heard that before..lol, but this should be his last term, but as long as Cook is there we should be fine..
The ground could host regular A League, NRL and future super 14 matches.
It's us vs America and maybe Mexico for 2022. We are atleast a 50% chance.There's no friggin way the World Cup will be played in Australia, let alone Geelong.
Premier John Brumby says he suggested Geelong's Skilled Stadium as a potential World Cup venue 18 months ago to a 'reluctant' Football Federation of Australia.
The Premier, speaking on SEN radio this morning, was further spruiking the use of an expanded Skilled Stadium to potentially help Australia win the right to host the World Cup in 2018 or 2022.
"The FFA has been obsessed about getting the MCG and Etihad (for their World Cup bid), and I think the history of that debate is now well known and that is that Etihad is not available," Brumby said.
Proposed redevelopment of Skilled Stadium (Geelong football ground) should Australia successfully bid for the World Cup in 2018 or 2022.
Proposed redevelopment of Skilled Stadium (Geelong football ground) should Australia successfully bid for the World Cup in 2018 or 2022. Photo: state government
"This is something that I put on the drawing board 18 months ago. Reluctantly, I think, FFA has come to the table.
"I always thought it (Skilled Stadium) was a great solution for soccer and a great solution for the AFL, and a great solution for Geelong."
The state government has suggested the current home of the Geelong AFL team be upgraded to hold 44,000 spectators. Its current capacity is 28,000.
World Cup regulations demand a minimum capacity of 44,000 for its matches, and Etihad Stadium (capacity approximately 54,000) is contractually bound to the AFL, which will lose access to the MCG during the World Cup finals if they are hosted in Australia.
Mr Brumby was sympathetic to the AFL's situation if a bid is successful, given that soccer's governing body FIFA demands exclusive use of all tournament stadiums for a month before their games commence.
"AFL is our homegrown game. You can't have a successful AFL competition if you lose the main two stadiums".
Brumby described the attitude of AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou to the World Cup bid as "co-operative, but realistic".
He said that Etihad Stadium was "absolutely locked in" to hosting AFL matches at the expense of World Cup soccer.
"In terms of people going through the turnstile, they will do better" from hosting two to three AFL matches a week rather than hosting a couple of World Cup matches, he said.
"You've got to take the long-term view on this", Mr Brumby said, promoting the Geelong region, which he pointed out already had a greater population than the Northern Territory and Hobart in Tasmania.
"In 10 to 15 years you're going to see 400 to 500,000 people" in the area, he said.
On 3AW radio this morning, Sports Minister James Merlino repeated the government's line, calling the Skilled Stadium concept plan "a win for the AFL, a win for soccer and the World Cup bid and a win for Geelong".
Geelong's grand vision
Geelong had already sourced an alternative training venue at Armstrong Creek, south of Geelong, and chief executive Brian Cook said the Cats would probably have to play all of their 2018 home matches in Melbourne.
He said the possible World Cup development was stage four of a vision the club had for Skilled Stadium since 2000.
The club has just completed stage two, bringing the capacity of the stadium formerly known as Kardinia Park to 30,000 seats.
"It's an extension of where we've been in the last few years," Cook said this morning on SEN, describing the concept as a "coup for the whole region."
Cook says stage three of the Skilled Stadium works, requiring funding of $75 million, had still not been "ticked off" and he didn't want them tied to the success of the World Cup proposal.
He said none of the recently-completed stage two works would need to be altered to fit the world game modifications.
He hopes that stage four would be funded jointly by state and federal governments, but admitted his ambitions had "a long way to go."
It's us vs America and maybe Mexico for 2022. We are atleast a 50% chance.http://www.theage.com.au/sport/socc...-reluctant-ffa-20100302-peef.html?autostart=1
USA, yeah, they have the stadia but have had it recently and it had no real impact on soccer in the US.Mexico have pulled out of the bidding process. Its us vs USA, Japan and possibly Korea.
so is there any chance they will commit to do this before we obtain the 2022 world cup?USA, yeah, they have the stadia but have had it recently and it had no real impact on soccer in the US.
Japan and Korea have also had it recently, and they would have the same, if not more work to do to be able tohost the world cup by themselves than us.
People who think we arn't a chance are kidden
That little detail better not change in the later plans.The initial plans allow for Skilled Stadium to be converted back to an oval after the tournament.
By that argument, we shouldn't play Essendon at the docklands but we doyeah fair enough. but i dont think geelong will get home games collingwood, essendon, or finals against victorian teams (perhaps aside from nth.melbourne and melbourne). why would they play in front of 42,000 at skilled when they could in front of 60,000+ at the MCG.
Hi i'm magic johnson and i'm a ******[youtube]kGvUqJmkqTg[/youtube]
Hi i'm magic johnson and i'm a ******
I hope you are not talking about what he saidThat looks bloody awesome.
yeah but the AFL cares more about crowd figures than how much we make.By that argument, we shouldn't play Essendon at the docklands but we do
The amount of income generated on a per match match basis will be absolutely huge when the house is full. We would be doing ourselves out of at a least $500K a match by playing at the G.
yeah but the AFL cares more about crowd figures than how much we make.
at etihad, if both teams are towards the top end, they would be drawing around 50,000. im surprised that the capacity (at skilled) couldnt be more, i wonder if standing room is included in the design.
Isn't there's a contract that states that no stadium should exceed more than Etihad or something? I remember reading it about that new bubble stadium and why it wasn't more than 43 thousands seats.
Anyone care to clear that up for me?
Cats beware ... make sure the taxpayer carries the debt, that its not paid off by footy fans because thats whats happening at the MCG: run by a cricket club, backed by taxpayer funds, paid off by footy fans.
Dont get suckered here.
Yeah that was a bit disappointing - aground 40K+ ground would suit us better and would be regularly sold out.Interesting article a couple of days ago that appeared in the SMH and The Age. Indicates that the post-WC capacity would be 37,000, so not really much different from the Phase 3 expansion already being mooted by the club.