-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Southern FL - Division 3 - 2010
- Thread starter MountPrettyBoy
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Sorry bud but the guy reported was the guy that fronted up to the tribunal.
No need for us to cheat, we are absolutely flying
hi junior,Sorry bud but the guy reported was the guy that fronted up to the tribunal.
No need for us to cheat, we are absolutely flying
are you the new doveton
?? i will watch your team with great interest from now on and see what posts are written about lyndale . 
Here_We_Go
Debutant
Sorry bud but the guy reported was the guy that fronted up to the tribunal.
No need for us to cheat, we are absolutely flying
Well i know for a fact the guy the SFL have listed on the list to appear tonight is in jail and isnt out till next year, so must be someone playing under his name LOL, unless the SFL got it wrong but there never wrong.
Maradona
Debutant
Ha ha. That's a very interesting situation. I wonder how the SFL will handle it. If word gets back to the prison they might tack on a few weeks for bad behaviour.
Gotta love local football!
Boys the SFL have nothing to handle. Player was reported, player fronted up to tribunal, player found not guilty.
I think you will find that the player in question was released a couple of weeks ago.
After reading this forum and the other forums on the SFL it is apparent that the Southern Football League is without doubt a joke.Ever since the League made the appalling decision to abandon their junior competition in the early 90's and merge with the Churches League they have been steadily in decline.Next time you pick up the Monday morning edition of the Herald Sun, have a close look at how many soccer results and competitions are listed.Their game continues to grow exponentially and yet Aussie rules is still stuck in the 70's with thugs and idiots running and playing for clubs.One of the reasons you have 50 year olds umpiring in Div 3 is because the young umpires are walking away from the game or umpiring in properly run leagues.Maybe it is time that suspended players are forced to spend a week or two umpiring games and then they may appreciate how hard it is.If they refuse then their suspension stands until they do so. The Ammo's take no shit from any club and deal with them quickly.It is time that the SFL does the same and no more excuses or delays. If they end up with one division then so be it, but at least it will properly run.
Here_We_Go
Debutant
See Junior1, you full of shit cause i went and saw josh at the weekend. He was due to get out only early release but he stuffed up and now has to do the full sentence. So someone down at Lyndale is lying.
See Junior1, you full of shit cause i went and saw josh at the weekend. He was due to get out only early release but he stuffed up and now has to do the full sentence. So someone down at Lyndale is lying.
Mis-informed you are. Better way than saying full of sh!t.
The player you are talking about has been out since the 19th and since you clearly know him why don't you ring one of his mates, confirm this and then apologise for calling Lyndale a bunch of cheats.
children UMPIRE children MEN umpire MEN ,dont tell me you would be happy if two pimply faced 16 year old s umpired your game of football ,i would accept one younger umpire so long as he was with a seasoned umpire .and if you dont like sfl *** off
i think they are doing are great job with the limited support they recieve from the a.f,l, and the goverment as for soccer it will never happen how many different nationalitys have taking up aussie rules compared to soccer even if it was there fathers choice of sport and finally dragons are finals bound
- Banned
- #262
children UMPIRE children MEN umpire MEN ,dont tell me you would be happy if two pimply faced 16 year old s umpired your game of football ,i would accept one younger umpire so long as he was with a seasoned umpire .and if you dont like sfl *** off
inurface should be called get back in your hole!!!
inurface should be called get back in your hole!!!
am i allowed to disagree with other posters opinions, if not then can i pm you with every thing i want to post for your acceptance
- Banned
- #264
am i allowed to disagree with other posters opinions, if not then can i pm you with every thing i want to post for your acceptance
as i said in your hole
I have watched several Amateur games this season and the lower grades have had numerous 50 year olds umpiring. I've also played in the SFL for 10 + seasons and can assure you that the competition has changed significantly, there aren't any thugs running around anymore. Surely a 50 year old is capable of umpiring a game of football. I'm also told that the SFL has aligned themselves with the MSJFL umpiring fraternity so I'm sure the younger umpires will start coming through. I've seen C grade ammos this season and the two clubs had to provide boundary umpires and goal umpires - so no need to cast dispersions on the SFL when in fact all competitions struggle to field umpires. Well done to the SFL for aligning themselves with the MSJFL and I'm sure that will benefit the competition in years to come.[/quote]
The Ammos have 7 senior divisions plus reserves, Under 19' and Under 18's, plus Club 18 teams,so please do not waste your time trying to compare.The MSJFL came into existence when the Southern walked away from their junior competition and the MSJFL were forced to fill the breach.The Southern League has been trying to align themselves with the MSJFL for years without success, after abdicating their responsibility as guardians of the game.They have been desperately trying to lure clubs so as to restart their Under 18's and Under 19's.The young umpires are walking away from junior games let alone umpiring senior games, so keep dreaming if you believe that they will be there in a few years.You say the Southern League has changed? Really? Unless I am mistaken they just kicked out a club for their repeated poor behaviour and threats to umpires.It took them two years to do this and only when clubs and umpires refused to play against them.The whole competition needs to be revamped and clubs that behave like boguns including their supporters should be kicked out.Until this is done then the competition will continue to be a joke and more clubs will go the way of Doveton.We will then be forced to watch soccer become the major sport....urrrhhhh.
The Ammos have 7 senior divisions plus reserves, Under 19' and Under 18's, plus Club 18 teams,so please do not waste your time trying to compare.The MSJFL came into existence when the Southern walked away from their junior competition and the MSJFL were forced to fill the breach.The Southern League has been trying to align themselves with the MSJFL for years without success, after abdicating their responsibility as guardians of the game.They have been desperately trying to lure clubs so as to restart their Under 18's and Under 19's.The young umpires are walking away from junior games let alone umpiring senior games, so keep dreaming if you believe that they will be there in a few years.You say the Southern League has changed? Really? Unless I am mistaken they just kicked out a club for their repeated poor behaviour and threats to umpires.It took them two years to do this and only when clubs and umpires refused to play against them.The whole competition needs to be revamped and clubs that behave like boguns including their supporters should be kicked out.Until this is done then the competition will continue to be a joke and more clubs will go the way of Doveton.We will then be forced to watch soccer become the major sport....urrrhhhh.
The Ammos have 7 senior divisions plus reserves, Under 19' and Under 18's, plus Club 18 teams,so please do not waste your time trying to compare.The MSJFL came into existence when the Southern walked away from their junior competition and the MSJFL were forced to fill the breach.The Southern League has been trying to align themselves with the MSJFL for years without success, after abdicating their responsibility as guardians of the game.They have been desperately trying to lure clubs so as to restart their Under 18's and Under 19's.The young umpires are walking away from junior games let alone umpiring senior games, so keep dreaming if you believe that they will be there in a few years.You say the Southern League has changed? Really? Unless I am mistaken they just kicked out a club for their repeated poor behaviour and threats to umpires.It took them two years to do this and only when clubs and umpires refused to play against them.The whole competition needs to be revamped and clubs that behave like boguns including their supporters should be kicked out.Until this is done then the competition will continue to be a joke and more clubs will go the way of Doveton.We will then be forced to watch soccer become the major sport....urrrhhhh.[/QUOTE]
If I'm not mistaken the Ammos are spread across an enormous area ranging from Geelong to Lillydale to Mornington so surely they have access to far more Umpires yet they still can't fill all positions. Doesn't the head of the Southern Football League work for the AFL ? so surely the changes he has made and the decisions he has made are in the interest of the game not just the Southern Football League. If you are claiming the league hasn't changed it's clear you haven't been following the football recently or your an umpire with a grudge. Would you care to name the clubs that behave like boguns ? I suppose umpires don't cop abuse in the Ammos because from D grade down there aren't actually any supporters at the game.
Return of the Pies
Team Captain
Also noting that most contentious umpiring decisions occur when there is a physical contest between two players. That doesn't happen much at the games 1969 is at!
Seriously 1969, you clearly have an opinion of the SFL that is based on very limited information and was probably formed on an experience you had a long time ago. Why bother coming on here and posting your rubbish? I hope the administrators in your competition aren't as flippant as you about what the SFL is doing.
Oh yeah, and 'bogun' is spelt BOGAN. Did they teach you nothing at grammar school???
Seriously 1969, you clearly have an opinion of the SFL that is based on very limited information and was probably formed on an experience you had a long time ago. Why bother coming on here and posting your rubbish? I hope the administrators in your competition aren't as flippant as you about what the SFL is doing.
Oh yeah, and 'bogun' is spelt BOGAN. Did they teach you nothing at grammar school???
a few DOVETON PLAYERS at the moorabinn v dandenong game yesterday said could be some good NEWS , monday, tuesday or wednesday
thats all they would say
gl 2 them i say hope something positive can come out of it for the players sake.a few DOVETON PLAYERS at the moorabinn v dandenong game yesterday said could be some good NEWS , monday, tuesday or wednesday
thats all they would say
gl 2 them i say hope something positive can come out of it for the players sake.
a few DOVETON PLAYERS at the moorabinn v dandenong game yesterday said could be some good NEWS , monday, tuesday or wednesday
thats all they would say
Surely they dont think their going to get re instated do they ?
- Banned
- #271
a few DOVETON PLAYERS at the moorabinn v dandenong game yesterday said could be some good NEWS , monday, tuesday or wednesday
thats all they would say
So you play for Moorabin ? mate you cant be that good because from what ive seen from that team i would say a super rules team would beat you!!!
the game was played in to halves morabbin started the better and held a nice 4or 5 goal lead at quarter time dandy then had quite a few chances but just could not get it into the right players hands half time morabbinn looked like how far but by 3quarter times you could see the momentun changing if not for bad shooting at goals dandenong perhaps could have one this game morabbinn i thought tired very badly after half time due to the great pressure dandy applied better players for moorrabinn 30,24,37 ,dandy players 13,1,18 would not think these two sides will be playing in a grand final.
this is only my opinion maybe my veiw will see it differentlyHampton v Mt Wav. Review/Preview. Prior to watching Saturdays game I'll admit I had preconceived ideas. I was informed by several people that Hampton would be suited to wet weather/contested football and Mt Wav would be far superior in dry conditions using leg speed to out run Hampton. Contrary to what I was told Hampton certainly had the advantage in terms of leg speed and that would be a real concern for Mt Wav going forward. Mt Wav have at least 5 players that are genuinely slow and can be exploited in transition. They struggle to chase out of defence and are closed down regularly when on the lead, also have an on baller who finds plenty of the ball in the middle but can't run with his direct opponent. Hampton need to find more options going forward as Mt Wav. will certainly double/triple team M.Scott. Looking ahead to the next encounter Hampton will rely on luck with injuries and if injury free will win the flag but if they encounter any injuries may struggle to find a replacement capable of being able to adapt to a senior final. Mount Wav. ruck department is superior and needs to dominate in this area. Mt Wav. have the depth to cover injuries and should look to inject some pace back into the side(long sleeves from reserves is quality). It will be an interesting Grand Final and one that would be hard to predict. There you go a bit of a ramble but interested to hear other peoples thoughts on these two teams.
Yeh I think it was no.14 who played on M.Scott but not sure of his name, If Michael Scott had of kicked accurately he could of ended up with a bag of 10. I admit the player in the long sleeves from the reserves may not be the hardest player going around but his skills were better than anything I saw in the seniors. It was a high intensity game but was riddled with skill errors. Will be an extremely interesting encounter but Mount would need to find some pace in the forward 50 to win. Tommy Evans played well and was allowed to run/carry and broke the lines but as stated earlier Mount have an onballer that finds plenty of the ball but really can't cover the ground and can't run with his direct opponent(I hope he wasn't on Evans). Great win by Hampton but not sure about dragging the the 3/4 time huddle over to the other wing so they could be in front of the crowd(cmon lads it's not the afl)
- Status
