Rooster 24
Cancelled
- Jul 31, 2009
- 1,507
- 543
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Dannerz, absolutely correct. The Dragons had a strat plan and a vision but that was spat out by the VAFA and now the Dragons have to start again. Watch this space and you will see the SFL again lend support but it will not be financial ..
Please enlighten us all as to how their stat plan and vision was “spat out by the VAFA”? That is just absolute rubbish. The VAFA, like the SFL now and before they made the ill-fated move, bent over backwards to assist them. And they were not lured across to the VAFA. They did so of their own accord believing (as it turned out incorrectly) that a competition where they did not have to compete with paying clubs was a better fit. A few seasons later they come to the conclusion that the travel factor was impacting on their ability to attract players and that a return to a geographical based competition was a better option. While probably the correct decision that has not worked out as they would have liked either.
Remember they did start life in the VAFA as the Club 18 arm of Box Hill North so have changed competitions 3 times now in a short space of time. While their demise is particularly sad it is pointless blaming the affiliate leagues. The constant chopping and changing between competitions surely did not help things.
And while I take your point about the comparison, for reasons that are too long winded to explain here the Dragons situation is nothing at all like the Ajax model.
Last edited: