- Thread starter
- #26
"not facing any legal issues" is one thing. It doesn't necessarily preclude behaviours you wouldn't want reported. But I stress, I have no idea what these allegations are about.Wilson states that there is no suggestion that Fisher is facing any legal issues so there should be no recriminations from writing about them in the article.
If you think it's fair for a reporter to allude to negative, consequential behaviour, then it's most definitely fair to actually mention it, as alluding leads people to think wildly about rumours and they can overreach in their estimations.
Wilson could quite easily have written, "It is believed that Fisher has not been fully committed to his preparations for the upcoming 2013 preseason and has, at times, broken team rules by staying out late, partying at several of Melbourne's popular boutique nightclubs, overindulging in alcohol on his break, and putting himself in a situation of danger be being intoxicated in a public place. While St. Kilda management have officially denied any serious problems with Fisher, some St. Kilda players are concerned that a member of the leadership group not acting with the professionalism demanded of such a role may have an adverse effect on St. Kilda's younger players and new draftees."
She hasn't written it because she doesn't want to be locked out from emails from the club and in such a case, would actually have to leave her ivory tower on Collins St and get down to the clubs home bases to do her work.
So again, if it's important enough to be alluded to by gossip-mongerers, then it's important enough to be reported on factually.
edit: Lance Uppercut
I do get what you're saying, but I don't agree with you that you either have to outline everything you know or say nothing at all. I think you can paint a picture of what's going on without actually giving all the grisly details and embarrassing the player