Source? Gotta apply them rulesIt went through?
Was a narrow thing, I heard. Or where they waiting until the Talia stuff was water under the bridge?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Source? Gotta apply them rulesIt went through?
Was a narrow thing, I heard. Or where they waiting until the Talia stuff was water under the bridge?
sydney aren't sponsored by an individual living in qatar. they are sponsored by a business owned by the state.I have an Australian passport, does that mean emphatically support everything the Australian government does?
St.Kilda are about as relevant to modern day football as the pyramids are btw.
And yours could be coke or Pepsi.
Coca Cola already sponsor Sydney. And are one of the Kangaroos suppliers. Next!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Qatar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Qatar
There are either going to be countries in the world where freedom of speech, womens rights, freedom of religion and human rights are upheld or countries where it isn't allowed. The gulf between the two is going to widen.
As in most Middle East countries it is not upheld in Qatar despite the window dressing of them "allowing" other religions and "allowing" women to drive. Do they allow conversion for example of a muslim to a hindu? or a muslim to a Buddhist? or a muslim to a Christian? the answer is no. Do they allow a free press?
Anyone who travels on this airline is indirectly helping people who despise women, and despise people who believe in freedom.
I'm going straight to hell.
I had an XR6 as a teen (Englishmen came to Oz and exterminated millions of natives), got a BMW after (German car - Hitler/Jews), had a Honda with a petrol engine (environmental issue), but made up for that and now own a Hybrid (cancels out emissions from previous few cars). I generally travel with Qatar Airways (condones homosexuality) whenever I travel to Lebanon, I eat KFC (poor chickens), and love my bacon (sorry Muslims), I also smoke (sorry anyone in a public space), have given Judd my vote during previous elections (sorry Australian election peeps), I've own a Nike/Adidas (child labour in Asia), barrack for Collingwood (sorry dentists) and work at a bank (sorry everyone).
Do I bypass purgatory and go straight to hell or.....?
I'm going straight to hell.
I had an XR6 as a teen (Englishmen came to Oz and exterminated millions of natives), got a BMW after (German car - Hitler/Jews), had a Honda with a petrol engine (environmental issue), but made up for that and now own a Hybrid (cancels out emissions from previous few cars). I generally travel with Qatar Airways (condones homosexuality) whenever I travel to Lebanon, I eat KFC (poor chickens), and love my bacon (sorry Muslims), I also smoke (sorry anyone in a public space), have given Judd my vote during previous elections (sorry Australian election peeps), I've own a Nike/Adidas (child labour in Asia), barrack for Collingwood (sorry dentists) and work at a bank (sorry everyone).
Do I bypass purgatory and go straight to hell or.....?
I am OK with everything until you got here. Shame on you.
Donkey vote? I'm good with everything but the Hybrid. FFS, you're not even trying.
Ok, well not quite the semi-intelligent discussion I had hoped for. Was looking to have a good discussion about how the AFL social agenda may begin to affect how we select sponsors and link in with businesses. Sydney supporters became defensive thinking it was an attack on them which it was clearly not. If it was the Saints, the same argument applies.
I still think that this may have some legs next Pride Game and it will be interesting to see whether Qatar is listed on the sponsor board during the press outings. Hopefully it is a non-issue but we will see.
Happy to close the thread if Mods want.
Those two countries are not 'viewed' as Muslim/Arab countries by the bananas, so no, it's fine.Would a deal with Singapore Airlines or Malaysia Air be subject to the same scrutiny? Homosexuality is illegal in both those countries.
For a number of reasons that would be quite amusing to witness - but if I were a betting man I would almost bet the ranch that no Qatar Air plane would be permitted to wear any gay/lgbt paint job. It would be illegal under Qatari law. And I can visualize the, uh, warm reception it would get as it taxied up to the gate at Hamad International, Doha...
Do they pay Sydney from the same pot they funnel money to ISIS from so they can overthrow Assad and run a pipeline through Syria?
No, they're seperate accounts.
north set to announce new major sponsor "joe's fish and chip shop"
seriously if this wasnt sydney, i doubt anyone would say a word
Those two countries are not 'viewed' as Muslim/Arab countries by the bananas, so no, it's fine.
It's just that we shouldn't associate with Arabs and Muslims because they're bad.
The pride game is at Etihad stadium, though. They didn't change the signage of the stadium for that.
I'm still not entirely clear what the exact issue is.
Does Qatari Air require it's sponsored teams to endorse the Qatari state's view of morality? On evidence (the fact they sponsored the club at all knowing they'd just played in a pride game, their existing partnership with Barca), the answer to that is no.
Is it because Qatar Air makes its money unethically, making their sponsorship dollars dirty? They just fly people around.
Is it because the airline is owned by the state, who derives a profit from the airline? Presumably the Qatari state is a shareholder in a whole range of companies. If the Qataris hold shares in, say, Citibank, does that make our deal with Citi problematic? What level of ownership is too much?
Is it because this is seen as promoting Qatar as a tourist destination? I'm unclear.
Would a deal with Singapore Airlines or Malaysia Air be subject to the same scrutiny? Homosexuality is illegal in both those countries.
Qatar is state owned so you would expect that there is some input. Hopefully the airline is completely seperate but the fact is the state has their laws and does own the company so it is a worthy question in my view. As I said before, the Swans and even AFL do not control the Docklands Stadium name so there is no issue there. Sydney rubber stamped this after the Pride Game which is now a part of their social identity so any potential business relationship should be assessed with their brand in mind. I personally would do the deal but it doesn't directly affect me. Doesn't mean it doesn't deserve a bit of thought.
Regarding Singapore and Malaysia, and probably more so Garuda, I would say the same applies.
Interestingly, just found this article which is related. It talks about workers rights as well as homosexual laws as a concern. As I said, happy for people not to be bothered, but if you have any understanding of brand management, this type of connection is always coming up. That is my background which is probably why it peaked my attention.
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...for-a-boycott-of-qatar-airways-300230724.html
Ok, well not quite the semi-intelligent discussion I had hoped for. Was looking to have a good discussion about how the AFL social agenda may begin to affect how we select sponsors and link in with businesses. Sydney supporters became defensive thinking it was an attack on them which it was clearly not. If it was the Saints, the same argument applies.
I still think that this may have some legs next Pride Game and it will be interesting to see whether Qatar is listed on the sponsor board during the press outings. Hopefully it is a non-issue but we will see.
Happy to close the thread if Mods want.
It's the responsible gambling foundation that quite a few clubs work with, not anti-gambling.Yes, the is a dissonance with holding the pride game while having such a sponsorship, just as there is clubs with pokies supporting anti-gambling initiatives (as my club does), but if anything, the discussion that raises is probably a good thing for the 'cause'.