Crows have clearly just gone for leadership where it matters. The end of season footy trip will be absolutely off the hook!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Crows have clearly just gone for leadership where it matters. The end of season footy trip will be absolutely off the hook!
if the captaincy was the difference between Danger staying or going then I'm glad he isn't captain..
Over here he has a regular radio spot with Nova so he is quite used to it, and he plays like a captain would. It's a strange one that Sloane is not captain.Yeah, I wouldn't read much into it. Dangerfield doesn't have the characteristics of a good captain - narcs rarely ever do.
Meanwhile Sloane doesn't strike me as the type of guy suited to the captaincy.
I think Walker is the ideal man for the job, he is respected on every level, whereas Dangerfield tends to be a bit of a knob.
What happened to upset all the power wagoners in here?
I'm not hanging shit & the AFC page/board mods are far too sensitive, gentile types - gave up on that mob a long time ago.
Tex skipper - petty? Hardly. More "high farce".
He reminds me of Fevola when he talks.
Fortunately, that's where the similarities end.
I just find it curious that Danger/Sloane were co-captains last year but both got snubbed this year for the full captaincy.
Paddy gets made captain = desperation move to try and keep him, he'll desert end of the season anyway, why not Rory Sloane?
Paddy doesn't get made captain = gawnnnn for sure, Adelaide are a rabble appointing Player X, why not Rory Sloane?
Well, tell your club that.
Boozing on TV & now skipper.
Reeks of desperation. A club clearly void of leadership candidates. Wasn't this guy suspended by the club for drinking a beer on TV?
Maybe it's just me but Tex doesn't strike me as a company guy so to say...
Not leader material.
Thought Dangerfield or Sloane would have been better options?
You're missing the point of what everybody has been suggesting the decision means. It's not that Danger and Sloane will leave because they weren't made Captain. It's that, they weren't made Captain because they are likely to leave.If Danger or Sloane are so petty that they'd leave their mates and the club they've been a part of for years just because they didn't get picked for captain then they would prove exactly why they don't deserve to be captain in the first place.
If they're team players they'll be disappointed sure but they'll accept it and put the team first.
You're missing the point of what everybody has been suggesting the decision means. It's not that Danger and Sloane will leave because they weren't made Captain. It's that, they weren't made Captain because they are likely to leave.
From an outsiders point of view, they were the two logical candidates for the AFC Captaincy and their snub suggests that perhaps they aren't fully committed to staying in Adelaide.
The character assignation begins.
http://bit.ly/14YRecO
News corp so desperate to make a story they stick up for Caro Wilson!The character assignation begins.
http://bit.ly/14YRecO
People seem to think to captain a footy club you need to have previous experience at the Large Hadron ColiderDisgraceful journalism, but what do you expect from a Newscorp media outlet... Nice of the journo to have the guts to put their name on it
It's not as though he was throwing back pints an hour before lining up at FF.
I reckon he could pull it off.