- Jul 19, 2010
- 26,949
- 72,441
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Losing another arguement I see.
I don’t think anybody here believes the majority of young people took the jab for their health.
Not even you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Losing another arguement I see.
Youre all over the shop..Oh please. If nothing else it’s plain to see from the uptake since mandates morphed into recommendations.
Form the Dept of Health website:
Fourth doses
Australians considered most at risk of severe illness and those aged 30 and over are eligible to receive a fourth dose 3 months after their third dose
So have you?
What “anybody here believes” doesnt really matter does it..I don’t think anybody here believes the majority of young people took the jab for their health.
Not even you.
And when he is he does what he does best..
View attachment 1544154
Not surprising. I don't believe ATAGI have yet recommended 4th doses for people aged under 40.
Most people follow the ATAGI advice. It's only morons, like SP, who don't.
You've constantly spoken for the majority...even if it doesn't exist.I don’t think anybody here believes the majority of young people took the jab for their health.
Not even you.
It's a very good question. I'm not one to "believe" anything. She was very very sick. Likely delta although they didn't specifically genome test at that stage. No pre-existing conditions. Do I think the vaccine gave her some antibodies? Science suggests that's most likely. Whether that was the difference? Doctors say yes. In the absence of any other evidence, we have to go with that I guess.Geniune question..
Do you and your partner believe the vax didnt do anything?.. or do you guys believe she is only alive today because she was actually vaxxed?..
He can get over this. If your Fetterman just shake it off, go home tonight, kiss the kid's good morning and tell them you will see them yesterday.
Perhaps not, but many of them took it in the interests of protecting vulnerable members of their family, or the wider community.I don’t think anybody here believes the majority of young people took the jab for their health.
Not even you.
Perhaps not, but many of them took it in the interests of protecting vulnerable members of their family, or the wider community.
This lady seems to make some really bad personal decisions first she gets the 2 lefty media tarts Lisa Wilkinson and her boofheaded red hanky wearing partner Peter FitzSimons involved and now this...she really needs to get some better advisors.And Higgins straight to the press afterwards and now Lehrmann's lawyers reporting that to Federal Police. This case is a mess.
Well, there's still a book to sell. If what she says occurred, occurred, apart from money, why would she want to relive everything and tell it in a book?And Higgins straight to the press afterwards and now Lehrmann's lawyers reporting that to Federal Police. This case is a mess.
I just can't take him seriously when I think of that ****ing stupid red rag on his head.This lady seems to make some really bad personal decisions first she gets the 2 lefty media tarts Lisa Wilkinson and her boofheaded red hanky wearing partner Peter FitzSimons involved and now this...she really needs to get some better advisors.
While some countries have been burning more fossil fuels such as coal this year in response to natural gas shortages caused by the war in Ukraine, that effect is expected to be short-lived, the International Energy Agency said in its annual World Energy Outlook, a 524-page report that forecasts global energy trends to 2050.
Instead, for the first time, the agency now predicts that worldwide demand for every type of fossil fuel will peak in the near future.
If there is a trial. You would think Luhrmann"s lawyers will make another application for a permanent stay.Well, there's still a book to sell. If what she says occurred, occurred, apart from money, why would she want to relive everything and tell it in a book?
But it is the reason ghouls will buy the book, to get to the horrible part, so keeping it all in high profile would be advantageous and I suspect we're going to be hearing/reading about it regularly until the retrial.
Higgins doesn't seem to mind a bit of press and attention but she's doing herself no favours if her media 'appearances' can be seen to be an influence on the case. I don't know what her strategy is or for what outcome, but on the surface it appears to me she's aiming for something more than a 'guilty' verdict, be that for personal gain or for some good, like reforming workplace procedures/processes ...I dunno.If there is a trial. You would think Luhrmann"s lawyers will make another application for a permanent stay.
That's not the case. There's no peer reviewed literature that says the Vax was not effective to any extent.A premise which was based on a lie.
And then he opens his stupid mouth and you realise the hanky isn't the worst thing about him.I just can't take him seriously when I think of that ******* stupid red rag on his head.