Stan_Darsh72
Hall of Famer
- Jun 18, 2011
- 39,409
- 66,471
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Its all on the Marsh train.Watson can see the end of his cricketing career approaching now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Its all on the Marsh train.Watson can see the end of his cricketing career approaching now.
If we can't get 10 overs each out of Marsh and Maxy against Bangladesh then we have issues.If you drop Watson when Clarke comes in, both Maxwell and Marsh need to bowl 10 overs each, or Finch, Clarke, or Smith will need to get some overs.
It's the same old story with Watson, if he couldn't bowl, he'd have been f***ed off out of all formats a long time ago.
If we can't get 10 overs each out of Marsh and Maxy against Bangladesh then we have issues.
**** Watson off once and for all.
Watson can see the end of his cricketing career approaching now.
You're going to see a guy who's just starting to show signs of regaining form being axed for the captain but Watson's golden ticket will continue despite failing again.Faulkner isn't due back until the end of the group stage though, is he?
http://www.lords.org/mcc/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-23-dead-ball/Couldn't be a cricket WC without a farcical event. How is that not a dead ball?
http://www.lords.org/mcc/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-23-dead-ball/
Law 23 (Dead ball)
1. Ball is dead
(a) The ball becomes dead when
(i) it is finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper or the bowler.
(ii) a boundary is scored. See Law 19.3 (Scoring a boundary).
(iii) a batsman is dismissed
Would have thought that the dead ball law settles this but somehow they still stuffed it up.
It just seems to defy logic. Can you imagine the outrage if Anderson had upon seeing the out decision stopped running.Law was written before reviews, out used to be out. You could technically argue that by being overturned it was no longer out, therefore that ruling was no longer valid (I would not be surprised to see the ICC Gieschen that call in such a way), but it'd be stupid to do so.
It just seems to defy logic. Can you imagine the outrage if Anderson had upon seeing the out decision stopped running.
He'd have been arguing until he was blue in the face.
If they're anything like some of the umps we have, they just wanted to get home. You do not want to get hit on the pad late in the game in our league.obviously the refs had a sportsbet on
Same here. 5pm and the ump is thinking of his first beer.If they're anything like some of the umps we have, they just wanted to get home. You do not want to get hit on the pad late in the game in our league.