I put it to you that you can never except the fact that the players have as much say in how their career pans out as a coach does and if a player doesn't turn out to be any good you quickly blame the coach for not developing the player properly rather than looking at the player.
I'll give you someone who I think would have been a better player under a more attacking coach. Daniel Wells.
And so this gets us back to Dean Laidleys. What has been his success record in developing players? Inconsistant I say at best. This is not good enough IMO.[/quote]
Thankyou for helping me make my point.